• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 11
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 13
  • 13
  • 10
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
11

Expertise Revisited: Reflecting on the Intersection of Science and Democracy in the Case of Fracking

Ahmadi, Mahdi 12 1900 (has links)
This dissertation aims to explain the conditions under which expertise can undermine democratic decision making. I argue that the root of the conflict between expertise and democracy lies in what I call insufficiently “representative” expertise – that is forms of scientific research that are not relevant to the policy questions at hand and that fail to make visible their hidden values dimensions. I claim that the scholarly literature on the problem of expertise fails to recognize and address the issue correctly, because it does not open the black box of scientific methodologies. I maintain that only by making sense of the methodological choices of experts in the context of policy making can we determine the relevance of research and reveal the hidden socio-political values and consequences. Using the case of natural gas fracking, I demonstrate how expert contributions – even though epistemically sound – can muddle democratic policy processes. I present four case studies from controversies about fracking to show how to contextualize scientific methodologies in the pertinent political process. I argue that the common problem across all case studies is the failure of expertise to sufficiently represent stakeholders’ problems and concerns. In this context, “representation” has three criteria: (1) the operational research questions on which the qualified experts work are relevant to stakeholders’ problems and concerns; (2) the non-epistemic values and consequences of epistemic choices of experts are compatible with social and political values and priorities; and (3) hidden values attached to facts are fully transparent and openly debated. In the conclusion, I propose a normative version of this representation theory that can be used to evaluate the appropriateness of expertise for democratic policy making. Instead of the value-free science ideal, I propose a new ideal to legitimately allow non-epistemic values in scientific reasoning without compromising the soundness of research.
12

Droits humains, démocratie, État de droit : chez Rawls, Habermas et Eboussi Boulaga /

Yamb, Gervais Désiré, January 1900 (has links)
Texte remanié de: Thèse de doctorat--Philosophie--Nancy 2, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 217-245).
13

Himmlische Quellen und irdisches Recht : religiöse Voraussetzungen des freiheitlichen Verfassungsstaates

Stein, Tine January 2007 (has links)
Teilw. zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Habil.-Schr., 2005/06 / Literaturverz. S. [346] - 372

Page generated in 0.1576 seconds