Thesis (M.F.A.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1992. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 51).

Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1989. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 40-41).

Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1990. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 107-108).

Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1989. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 57-61).

Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1995. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 17-20).

Thesis (M.S.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1995. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 53-56).

Thesis (M.F.A.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1993. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 79-80).

No description available.

In this study a Q-sort was used to measure differences in academic and public librarian attitudes toward computers, desktop publishing systems and expert systems. Fifty-two academic and sixty-two public librarians responded. The responses were sorted into groups based on the type of library and whether or not the respondent followed the stated Q-sort distribution.

In the discipline of librarianship there is very little existing research from which conclusions regarding attitudes toward computers and related technology can be drawn. Furthermore, there is no significant data available which indicates that attitudes differ between various groups or types of librarians. It is reasonable to assume that librarians' attitudes toward computers vary. This study examines a group of academic librarians and a group of public librarians and tests for significant differences in their respective attitudes toward computers, desktop publishing systems and expert systems.