Spelling suggestions: "subject:"4digital (‘cinq’) acquisition"" "subject:"4digital (‘cie’) acquisition""
1 |
Does the use of additional x-ray beam filtration during cine acquisition reduce clinical image quality and effective dose in cardiac interventional imaging?Davies, A.G., Gislason-Lee, Amber J., Cowen, A.R., Kengyelics, S.M., Lupton, M., Moore, J., Gaffney, C., Sparrow, T., Irving, H., Ali, S., Middleton, R., Campbell, S., Ackroyd,,, Sivananthan, M. 20 February 2014 (has links)
Yes / The impact of spectral filtration in digital (‘cine’) acquisition was investigated using a flat panel cardiac interventional X-ray imaging system. A 0.1-mm copper (Cu) and 1.0-mm aluminium (Al) filter added to the standard acquisition mode created the filtered mode for comparison. Image sequences of 35 patients were acquired, a double-blind subjective image quality assessment was completed and dose–area product (DAP) rates were calculated. Entrance surface dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) rates were determined for 20- and 30-cm phantoms. Phantom ESD fell by 28 and 41 % and E by 1 and 0.7 %, for the 20- and 30-cm phantoms, respectively, when using the filtration. Patient DAP rates fell by 43 % with no statistically significant difference in clinical image quality. Adding 0.1-mm Cu and 1.0-mm Al filtration in acquisition substantially reduces patient ESD and DAP, with no significant change in E or clinical image quality. / Supported in part by a research grant from Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands.
|
Page generated in 0.0831 seconds