Spelling suggestions: "subject:"dopamine deceptors"" "subject:"dopamine geceptors""
21 |
Regulation and physiological role of tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation in the striatum /Lindgren, Niklas, January 2003 (has links)
Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2003. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.
|
22 |
Modeling disturbances of cholinergic systems : possible relevance for schizophrenia /Mattsson, Anna, January 2005 (has links)
Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karolinska institutet, 2005. / Härtill 6 uppsatser.
|
23 |
The effects of kappa opioid and dopamine agonists on unconditioned behaviors and fos immunoreactivity in preweanling and adult ratsDuke, Marcus Alan 01 January 1996 (has links)
No description available.
|
24 |
Alterations of central dopamine receptor sensitivity in the spontaneously hypertensive ratMartin, John Richard 01 January 1979 (has links)
Since the time of the introduction of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) into medical research, several neuropharmacological studies have been performed on these animals which have been unrelated to their cardiovascular systems. A few of these studies have indicated possible abnormalities in the dopaminergic systems of SHR. Therefore the present study was undertaken to examine more closely the sensitivity of SHR to stimulation of their dopamine (DA) receptors.
|
25 |
Action of Dextroamphetamine on Dopamine Sensitive Cells in the Snail BrainHancock, John C., Guillot, Judy M. 08 May 1981 (has links)
Presynaptic and postsynaptic actions of dextroamphetamine (DEX) were studied on dopamine (DA) sensitive neurons of the subesophageal ganglion of the garden snail Helix aspersa utilizing standard microelectrode techniques. Dextroamphetamine (5.5 × 10-7-10-4 M) produced effects on DA-sensitive neurons similar to that caused by DA (5.5 × 10-7-10-4 M). On cells excited by DA, surfused DEX (5.5 × 10-7 M) caused an excitation that could be blocked by chlorpromazine (0.5-1 × 10-6 M) or haloperidol (0.5-1 × 10-6 M). Elevating the extracellular Mg2+ from 4 to 20 mM reduced the depolarization caused by DEX from 11 to 2.5 mV without affecting the response to DA. The response remaining is attributed to a direct response to DEX on DA receptors. Surfused DEX caused an inhibition of cells inhibited by DA. Both DA and DEX effects were selectively blocked by dihydroergotamine (0.5-1 × 10-6 M). Elevating the [Mg2+] decreased the hyperpolarization caused by DEX from 11 to 3 mV without affecting the DA response. The effect of elevated magnesium in decreasing responses to surfused DEX suggests that the primary action of DEX is at the nerve terminal to cause DA release. Iontophoretic application of DEX caused minimal excitation or inhibition of DA neurons. This is attributed to the fact that DA receptors at the site of drug application are not associated with synaptic innervation. The response obtained with iontophoretically applied DEX suggest a weak direct action on DA receptors.
|
26 |
Effect of Melatonin and Dopamine in Site Specific Phosphorylation of Phosducin in Intact RetinaNkemdirim, Arinzechukwu Okere 31 August 2005 (has links) (PDF)
Phosducin (Pdc) is a 28 kDa binding partner for the G protein beta gamma subunit dimer (G-beta-gamma) found abundantly in the photoreceptor cells of the retina and pineal gland. In the retina, light-dependent changes in cAMP and Ca2+ control the phosphorylation of Pdc at serine 73 and 54, respectively, which in turn controls the binding of Pdc to G protein beta gamma subunit dimer . G protein beta gamma subunit dimer binding has been proposed to facilitate light-driven transport of G protein beta gamma subunit dimer from the site of phototransduction in the outer segment of the photoreceptor cell to the inner segment, thereby decreasing light sensitivity and contributing to the process of light adaptation. Dopamine and melatonin are neuromodulators whose concentrations in the retina vary reciprocally during the circadian cycle, with dopamine high during the day and melatonin high during the night. Together, they control numerous aspects of light and dark adaptation in the retina. In this study, we have investigated the possible roles of dopamine and melatonin in regulating Pdc phosphorylation. Using phosphorylation-site specific antibodies to serines 54 and 73, we show that dopamine decreases the phosphorylation of both sites. This decrease is blocked by D4 receptor antagonists and pertussis toxin, indicating that dopamine causes a decrease in photoreceptor cell cAMP and Ca2+ concentration via the D4 receptor coupled to the Gi protein. Conversely, melatonin increases the phosphorylation of both S54 and S73, most likely via the inhibition of dopamine synthesis. These results demonstrate that dopamine and melatonin control the phosphorylation state of phosducin by changing the concentration of cAMP and Ca2+ in photoreceptor cells, and they suggest that dopamine and melatonin may contribute to the light-induced movement of the photoreceptor G protein by regulating Pdc phosphorylation.
|
27 |
Pineal-mediated inhibition of prolactin cell activity: Investigation of dopaminergic involvement.Burns, Danny Michael. January 1989 (has links)
The purpose of these studies was to determine whether the inhibitory effects of short photoperiod exposure on prolactin cell activity in male Syrian hamsters and/or the inhibitory effects of melatonin treatment on the growth and activity of diethylstilbestrol- (DES) induced prolactinomas in Fisher 344 (F344) rats were possibly mediated through alterations in dopaminergic regulatory mechanisms. In both the hamster and the rat, changes in hypothalamic dopamine neuronal activity and changes in pituitary responsiveness to dopamine have been suggested as possible mechanisms in the prolactin-inhibitory effects of light deprivation or melatonin administration. The present studies in the male Syrian hamster addressed two issues. First, it was of interest to determine if anterior pituitaries of long photoperiod-exposed male hamsters possess dopamine receptors, which are presumably necessary for responsiveness to dopamine. This was accomplished by analysis of ³H-spiperone binding to anterior pituitary membranes. Second, possible changes in pituitary sensitivity to dopamine were assessed by comparison of dose response curves for the inhibition by dopamine of prolactin release from hemipituitaries incubated in vitro from both long and short photoperiod-exposed animals over a series of time points from three to fifteen weeks. In the second series of experiments, adult female F344 rats received daily injection of melatonin or saline vehicle. After two weeks, half of the animals were sacrificed for analysis of ³H-spiperone binding to anterior pituitary membranes, measurement of hypothalamic dopamine turnover and analysis of in vitro pituitary sensitivity to dopamine. The remaining animals received subcutaneous implants containing DES and injections were continued on the same schedule until sacrifice four weeks later for measurement of the same parameters. In both the hamster and rat models, treatments exerted profound inhibitory effects on indices of prolactin cell activity. However, these studies provide no evidence for the involvement of altered dopaminergic regulation in the production of such effects. Neither pituitary sensitivity to dopamine in vitro nor hypothalamic dopamine neuronal activity was enhanced by short photoperiod exposure or melatonin treatment. Prolactin-inhibitory effects of these treatments appear to be mediated through as yet unidentified dopamine-independent mechanisms.
|
28 |
Methionine sulfoxide reductase (Msr) deficiency leads to a reduction of dopamine levels in DrosophilaUnknown Date (has links)
Biological homeostasis relies on protective mechanisms that respond to cellular oxidation caused primarily by free radical reactions. Methionine sulfoxide reductases (Msr) are a class of enzymes that reverse oxidative damage to methionine in proteins. The focus of this study is on the relationship between Msr and dopamine levels in Drosophila. Dopaminergic neurons in Drosophila have comparable roles to those found in humans. A deficit in dopamine leads to the onset of many neurological disorders including the loss of fine motor control—a neurodegenerative condition characteristic of Parkinson’s disease (PD). We found that dopamine levels in the heads of MsrAΔ/ΔBΔ/Δ mutants are significantly reduced in comparison to MsrA ⁺/⁺ B⁺/⁺ heads. In addition, wefound protein and expression levels are markedly reduced in an Msr-deficient system. Our findings suggest an important role for the Msr system in the CNS. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2014. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
|
29 |
Dopamine related signaling pathways on generation of projection pattern at the Mouse chiasm. / CUHK electronic theses & dissertations collectionJanuary 2013 (has links)
Chen, Tingting. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 100-109). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstract also in Chinese.
|
30 |
Implication des récepteurs de la dopamine dans la régulation de l’axe gonadotrope lors de la période pré-ovulatoire chez le sandre, Sander lucioperca / Dopamine receptors involvement in the regulation of the gonadotropic axis during the pre-ovulatory period in pikeperch, Sander luciopercaRoche, Jennifer 19 November 2018 (has links)
Dans le cadre de la production de nouvelles espèces aquacoles, le sandre, Sander lucioperca, est devenu, depuis plusieurs années, une espèce d’intérêt piscicole en raison de sa valeur économique potentielle. Pour développer et pérenniser sa production aquacole, il est nécessaire de comprendre et maîtriser son cycle de reproduction ainsi que les mécanismes physiologiques mis en jeu afin d’obtenir des œufs et des juvéniles viables tout au long de l’année. Dans cet optique d’optimisation du contrôle du cycle, la dopamine apparaît, chez de nombreux téléostéens dont certains perciformes, comme un inhibiteur de l’axe gonadotrope, via les récepteurs de la famille D2, en bloquant le pulse ovulatoire de LH et l’ovulation. Chez le sandre, le rôle de la dopamine et de ses récepteurs, notamment les récepteurs de la famille D1, est inconnu. L’objet de cette thèse est de déterminer le rôle du système dopaminergique lors des phases finales de l’ovogénèse chez le sandre à travers trois axes principaux : (1) déterminer l’effet du blocage des récepteurs de la dopamine, D1 ou D2, sur la régulation de l’axe gonadotrope et l’induction de l’ovulation en absence et en présence d’une molécule de sGnRHa, (2) définir le répertoire et le profil d’expression des récepteurs dopaminergiques par l’étude du transcriptome cérébral du sandre en période pré-ovulatoire et (3) établir le rôle de la dopamine et de ses différents récepteurs (familles D1 et D2) dans la régulation directe et locale de l’axe gonadotrope aux niveaux cérébral et ovarien. La première partie de ce travail a permis pour la première fois, par l’utilisation d’antagonistes spécifiques des familles de récepteurs D1 et D2, de mettre en évidence un rôle potentiel de la dopamine sur la sécrétion de certains stéroïdes sexuels en période pré-ovulatoire chez le sandre par l’intermédiaire des récepteurs de la famille D1. L’identification de l’ensemble des récepteurs de la dopamine existant chez le sandre nous a permis de confirmer leur expression à tous les niveaux de l’axe gonadotrope (cerveau, hypophyse et ovaires) étayant l’hypothèse d’un rôle de la dopamine dans la reproduction du sandre. Enfin, la dernière partie de ce projet a permis de montrer un rôle régulateur du système dopaminergique, directement au niveau ovarien, sur la production de testostérone par l’intermédiaire des deux familles de récepteurs de la dopamine. L’implication des deux familles de récepteurs a également été mise en évidence dans la production ovarienne de la 17β-estradiol. Au niveau cérébral, seule la famille des récepteurs D2 a été montrée impliquée dans la régulation de l’expression du gène de la GnRH-3. De façon générale, cette étude a permis de mettre en évidence l’implication des récepteurs de la dopamine dans la régulation de l’axe gonadotrope lors des phases finales de l’ovogenèse. Toutefois, des travaux ultérieurs devront être menés pour approfondir les mécanismes physiologiques mis en jeu. D’un point de vue aquacole, les traitements hormonaux à base d’antagonistes des récepteurs de la dopamine ont été inefficaces pour améliorer les performances de reproduction du sandre ce qui n’est pas en faveur de leur utilisation future pour induire l’ovulation chez cette espèce. Ainsi, la mise au point d’autres méthodes d’optimisation sera nécessaire pour continuer à développer la production aquacole du sandre / Pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, is a potential valuable economic fish, making it a species of interest for aquaculture diversification. In the domestication process, controlling and understanding the reproductive cycle is a crucial step in order to produce viable offspring in a synchronous and predictable way. In many teleosts including some perciforms, dopamine inhibits the ovulatory pulse of LH and the ovulation step through D2 dopamine receptors family. In pikeperch, the roles of dopamine and its receptors, especially those belonging to the D1 receptors family, are unknown. For the purpose of the optimization of pikeperch reproduction, we investigated the role of the dopaminergic system during the final stages of oogenesis in this species: (1) by determining the effects of D1 or D2 receptor antagonists alone or in association with sGnRHa on the regulation of the reproductive axis and on the induction of ovulation, (2) by determining the repertoire and the expression profile of the dopamine receptors using a brain transcriptome analysis during the pre-ovulatory period and (3) by evaluating the role of dopamine and its receptors (D1 and D2 families) in the direct and local regulation of the gonadotropic axis at the brain and ovarian levels. For the first time, we showed that the dopamine/D1 receptors complex regulates the sex-steroids release during the pre-ovulatory period, suggesting that dopamine is involved in pikeperch reproduction. Also, we support its involvement thanks to the identification of the dopamine receptors gene expression at the brain, pituitary and ovarian levels. Finally, we showed that the dopaminergic system directly regulates the ovarian testosterone production, through both D1 and D2 receptor families. The involvement of both dopamine receptor families was also highlighted on ovarian 17β-estradiol production. Only the D2 receptor family was shown to be involved on the brain GnRH-3 gene expression. In conclusion, we point out a dopamine receptors implication on the gonadotropic axis regulation during the final stages of oogenesis in pikeperch. However, further studies should be performed to pinpoint the physiological mechanisms behind this phenomenon. From an aquaculture point of view, hormonal treatments with dopamine receptor antagonists appear to be ineffective to improve pikeperch reproductive performances. Therefore, their use to induce pikeperch ovulation should be put into question and the development of alternative methods is necessary to further promote pikeperch production
|
Page generated in 0.5634 seconds