Individuals with stroke often demonstrate impaired ankle-foot function, commonly termed dropped foot that affects their ability to walk safely at home and within their community. While interventions are available to improve gait function, they have inconsistency demonstrated positive effects due to the lack of evidence-based practice guidelines and a limited understanding of the mechanisms leading to dropped foot. The aim of this dissertation was to 1) determine the relationship between dropped foot gait deviations and impaired sensorimotor control, 2) compare gait biomechanics between stroke survivors with and without dropped foot impairment, and 3) evaluate the immediate effects of an ankle-foot orthotic (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) device among stroke survivors with dropped foot impairment. Our evaluation combined standardized clinical measures of ankle-foot function (i.e. sensorimotor control, strength, spasticity and range of motion) and gait analysis using advanced laboratory techniques (i.e. electromyography and electrical goniometers) to quantify mechanisms of dropped foot impairment. Fifty-five stroke survivors completed the assessment prior to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Individuals with poor generation of isometric dorsiflexor force and reduced passive ankle range of motion were likely to demonstrate greater plantarflexion in swing and limited stance phase ankle joint excursion, respectively. Results from the gait analysis revealed a delayed onset and reduced activation time of the ankle dorsiflexors, and decreased co-activation time in the stance phase as possible mechanisms leading to dropped foot. A detailed case series was performed with four stroke survivors with dropped foot currently using an AFO. Application of an AFO immediately improved peak dorsiflexion in the swing phase and limited ankle range of motion during stance. When walking with the FES device, individuals with moderate dorsiflexor muscle weakness improved their ankle position at initial contact and increased peak dorsiflexion during stance, while no significant changes were observed among individuals with greater impairment. Overall, the results highlighted individual differences in response to interventions aimed at improving dropped foot gait deviations. These findings contribute to a greater understanding of gait dysfunction post stroke, and may lead to the development of a more effective clinical assessment and intervention strategies to improve dropped foot impairment.

Individuals with stroke often demonstrate impaired ankle-foot function, commonly termed dropped foot that affects their ability to walk safely at home and within their community. While interventions are available to improve gait function, they have inconsistency demonstrated positive effects due to the lack of evidence-based practice guidelines and a limited understanding of the mechanisms leading to dropped foot. The aim of this dissertation was to 1) determine the relationship between dropped foot gait deviations and impaired sensorimotor control, 2) compare gait biomechanics between stroke survivors with and without dropped foot impairment, and 3) evaluate the immediate effects of an ankle-foot orthotic (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) device among stroke survivors with dropped foot impairment. Our evaluation combined standardized clinical measures of ankle-foot function (i.e. sensorimotor control, strength, spasticity and range of motion) and gait analysis using advanced laboratory techniques (i.e. electromyography and electrical goniometers) to quantify mechanisms of dropped foot impairment. Fifty-five stroke survivors completed the assessment prior to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Individuals with poor generation of isometric dorsiflexor force and reduced passive ankle range of motion were likely to demonstrate greater plantarflexion in swing and limited stance phase ankle joint excursion, respectively. Results from the gait analysis revealed a delayed onset and reduced activation time of the ankle dorsiflexors, and decreased co-activation time in the stance phase as possible mechanisms leading to dropped foot. A detailed case series was performed with four stroke survivors with dropped foot currently using an AFO. Application of an AFO immediately improved peak dorsiflexion in the swing phase and limited ankle range of motion during stance. When walking with the FES device, individuals with moderate dorsiflexor muscle weakness improved their ankle position at initial contact and increased peak dorsiflexion during stance, while no significant changes were observed among individuals with greater impairment. Overall, the results highlighted individual differences in response to interventions aimed at improving dropped foot gait deviations. These findings contribute to a greater understanding of gait dysfunction post stroke, and may lead to the development of a more effective clinical assessment and intervention strategies to improve dropped foot impairment.