Spelling suggestions: "subject:"fry cover"" "subject:"ary cover""
1 |
Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes tipos de cobertura seca aplicados a depósitos de rejeitos de carvãoSouza, Márcia Raquel Ronconi de January 2012 (has links)
Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho de diferentes tipos de coberturas secas utilizadas em células experimentais preenchidas com rejeitos piritosos de carvão mineral. Quatro células de igual dimensão foram preenchidas com rejeitos piritosos, provenientes do beneficiamento de carvão mineral da Unidade Mineira II – Verdinho, pertencente à Carbonífera Criciúma S.A., situada no município de Forquilhinha, Estado de Santa Catarina. Em relação à composição das células, a primeira foi construída sem cobertura; a segunda, com somente pré-cobertura, constituída de mistura de rejeitos; a terceira, com cobertura de argila compactada; e a quarta elaborada com sistema de barreira capilar dupla. Todas foram expostas às mesmas condições meteorológicas. Para avaliação do desempenho das coberturas analisou-se o volume e características químicas e físico-químicas da água de percolação no período compreendido entre 2009 e 2010. Os parâmetros físicoquímicos considerados foram os seguintes: pH, Eh, acidez, alcalinidade e condutividade enquanto que os parâmetros químicos foram Fe, Al, Mn, Zn e sulfato. A partir dos resultados obtidos, fez-se uma análise técnica dos diferentes tipos de cobertura seca utilizados. De acordo com análise técnica constatou-se que o melhor desempenho no tocante ao volume e à qualidade da água percolada ocorreu na célula em que se utilizou cobertura com argila compactada e na célula em que se empregou cobertura do tipo barreira capilar dupla. / This work aimed to evaluate the performance of different types of dry cover employed in experimental cells filled with pyritic waste of mineral coal. Four cells with the same dimension were filled with coal tailings from the coal preparation plant of Unidade Mineira II –Verdinho, which belongs to Carbonífera Criciúma SA, located in Forquilhinha, Santa Catarina State. The first cell was constructed without any kind of cover, the second one was built with a cover composed by a mixture of coal wastes, the third one was built with a layer of compacted clay, and the forth one was constructed with a system composed by a dual-capillary barrier. All were exposed to the same meteorological conditions. To evaluate the performances of dry covers we analyzed the volume and the chemical and physicochemical characteristics of seepage between 2009 and 2010. The water was analyzed in terms of pH, Eh, acidity, alkalinity, conductivity and the concentration of Fe, Al, Mn, Zn, and sulfate. The experimental results showed that the best performance concerning the volume and the quality of the percolated water was obtained in the cell that received a cover of compacted clay and in the one that received a cover composed by dualcapillary barrier.
|
2 |
Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes tipos de cobertura seca aplicados a depósitos de rejeitos de carvãoSouza, Márcia Raquel Ronconi de January 2012 (has links)
Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho de diferentes tipos de coberturas secas utilizadas em células experimentais preenchidas com rejeitos piritosos de carvão mineral. Quatro células de igual dimensão foram preenchidas com rejeitos piritosos, provenientes do beneficiamento de carvão mineral da Unidade Mineira II – Verdinho, pertencente à Carbonífera Criciúma S.A., situada no município de Forquilhinha, Estado de Santa Catarina. Em relação à composição das células, a primeira foi construída sem cobertura; a segunda, com somente pré-cobertura, constituída de mistura de rejeitos; a terceira, com cobertura de argila compactada; e a quarta elaborada com sistema de barreira capilar dupla. Todas foram expostas às mesmas condições meteorológicas. Para avaliação do desempenho das coberturas analisou-se o volume e características químicas e físico-químicas da água de percolação no período compreendido entre 2009 e 2010. Os parâmetros físicoquímicos considerados foram os seguintes: pH, Eh, acidez, alcalinidade e condutividade enquanto que os parâmetros químicos foram Fe, Al, Mn, Zn e sulfato. A partir dos resultados obtidos, fez-se uma análise técnica dos diferentes tipos de cobertura seca utilizados. De acordo com análise técnica constatou-se que o melhor desempenho no tocante ao volume e à qualidade da água percolada ocorreu na célula em que se utilizou cobertura com argila compactada e na célula em que se empregou cobertura do tipo barreira capilar dupla. / This work aimed to evaluate the performance of different types of dry cover employed in experimental cells filled with pyritic waste of mineral coal. Four cells with the same dimension were filled with coal tailings from the coal preparation plant of Unidade Mineira II –Verdinho, which belongs to Carbonífera Criciúma SA, located in Forquilhinha, Santa Catarina State. The first cell was constructed without any kind of cover, the second one was built with a cover composed by a mixture of coal wastes, the third one was built with a layer of compacted clay, and the forth one was constructed with a system composed by a dual-capillary barrier. All were exposed to the same meteorological conditions. To evaluate the performances of dry covers we analyzed the volume and the chemical and physicochemical characteristics of seepage between 2009 and 2010. The water was analyzed in terms of pH, Eh, acidity, alkalinity, conductivity and the concentration of Fe, Al, Mn, Zn, and sulfate. The experimental results showed that the best performance concerning the volume and the quality of the percolated water was obtained in the cell that received a cover of compacted clay and in the one that received a cover composed by dualcapillary barrier.
|
3 |
Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes tipos de cobertura seca aplicados a depósitos de rejeitos de carvãoSouza, Márcia Raquel Ronconi de January 2012 (has links)
Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho de diferentes tipos de coberturas secas utilizadas em células experimentais preenchidas com rejeitos piritosos de carvão mineral. Quatro células de igual dimensão foram preenchidas com rejeitos piritosos, provenientes do beneficiamento de carvão mineral da Unidade Mineira II – Verdinho, pertencente à Carbonífera Criciúma S.A., situada no município de Forquilhinha, Estado de Santa Catarina. Em relação à composição das células, a primeira foi construída sem cobertura; a segunda, com somente pré-cobertura, constituída de mistura de rejeitos; a terceira, com cobertura de argila compactada; e a quarta elaborada com sistema de barreira capilar dupla. Todas foram expostas às mesmas condições meteorológicas. Para avaliação do desempenho das coberturas analisou-se o volume e características químicas e físico-químicas da água de percolação no período compreendido entre 2009 e 2010. Os parâmetros físicoquímicos considerados foram os seguintes: pH, Eh, acidez, alcalinidade e condutividade enquanto que os parâmetros químicos foram Fe, Al, Mn, Zn e sulfato. A partir dos resultados obtidos, fez-se uma análise técnica dos diferentes tipos de cobertura seca utilizados. De acordo com análise técnica constatou-se que o melhor desempenho no tocante ao volume e à qualidade da água percolada ocorreu na célula em que se utilizou cobertura com argila compactada e na célula em que se empregou cobertura do tipo barreira capilar dupla. / This work aimed to evaluate the performance of different types of dry cover employed in experimental cells filled with pyritic waste of mineral coal. Four cells with the same dimension were filled with coal tailings from the coal preparation plant of Unidade Mineira II –Verdinho, which belongs to Carbonífera Criciúma SA, located in Forquilhinha, Santa Catarina State. The first cell was constructed without any kind of cover, the second one was built with a cover composed by a mixture of coal wastes, the third one was built with a layer of compacted clay, and the forth one was constructed with a system composed by a dual-capillary barrier. All were exposed to the same meteorological conditions. To evaluate the performances of dry covers we analyzed the volume and the chemical and physicochemical characteristics of seepage between 2009 and 2010. The water was analyzed in terms of pH, Eh, acidity, alkalinity, conductivity and the concentration of Fe, Al, Mn, Zn, and sulfate. The experimental results showed that the best performance concerning the volume and the quality of the percolated water was obtained in the cell that received a cover of compacted clay and in the one that received a cover composed by dualcapillary barrier.
|
4 |
Co-disposal of waste rock and lignite fly ash to mitigate the environmental impact of coal miningQureshi, Asif January 2016 (has links)
Waste rocks (WRs) from coal mining and fly ash (FA) from coal combustion were studied to determine the potential of the WRs to generate AMD, FAs to neutralise it and estimate their impacts on environment. The ultimate goal was to develop a methodology based on co-disposal to mitigate the environmental problems associated to both wastes. Two methods for co-disposal were tested: i) Mixing WRs and FAs and ii) covering WRs with FAs. WRs were sampled from the Lakhra coal mines in Pakistan (PK), which has an estimated coal reserves of 1.3 Btonne, varying from lignite to sub-bituminous quality. The FA was sampled from a power plant utilising coal from Lakhra coal mines and is situated in close vicinity (15km) of the mine site. For comparative purposes a bituminous FA from Finland (FI) and biomass FA from Sweden (SE) were also characterised. The WRs and FA samples were characterised by mineralogical and geochemical methods. Besides organic material (coal traces), quartz, pyrite, kaolinite, hematite, gypsum and traces of calcite, lime, malladerite, spangolite, franklinite and birnessite were identified in WRs by XRD. The major elements Si, Al, Ca and Fe were in the range (wt. %) of 8 – 12, 6 – 9, 0.3 – 3 and 1 – 10, respectively, with high S concentrations (1.94 – 11.33 wt. %) in WRs. The AMD potential of WRs ranged from -70 to -492 kg CaCO3 tonne-1. All FAs contained quartz, with iron oxide, anhydrite and magnesioferrite in PK, mullite and lime in FI and calcite and anorthite in SE. The Ca content in SE was 6 and 8 times higher compared to PK and FI, respectively. FAs were enriched in As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn compared to continental crust. The acid neutralising potential of PK was equivalent to 20 kg CaCO3 tonne-1 compared to 275 kg CaCO3 tonne-1 (SE) and 25 kg CaCO3 tonne-1 (FI). During the period of 192 days in weathering cell experiments (WCE), the pH of leachates from most acidic WRs was maintained from 1 to 2.5, whereas, the less acidic WRs produced leachates of mildly acidic (2.7) to neutral (7.3) pH. The leachates from very acidic WRs ranged in the concentrations of Fe, SO24− and Al from mg L-1 to g L-1. The samples were subjected to column leaching experiments (CLE) in which mixture (FA:WR; 1:3) and cover (FA:WR; 1:5) cases were mimicked (with 10mm particle size) and effects of particle size (2, 5 and 10mm) on element leaching were studied. Despite having the lowest acid-neutralisation potential compared to FI and SE, co-disposal of PKFA as mixture readily provides acid buffering minerals, resulting in better start-up pH conditions and leachate quality. However, acidity produced by secondary mineralisation contributes towards the acidification of the system, causing stabilisation of pH at around 4.5−5. Secondary mineralisation (especially Fe- and Al-mineral precipitation) also removes toxic elements such as As, Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd, Co, Ni and Mn, and these secondary minerals can also buffer acidity when the pH tends to be acidic. In contrast, the pH of the leachates from the PKFA cover scenario gradually increased from strongly acidic to mildly acidic and circumneutral along with decrease in EC and elemental leaching in different WRs. Gradually increasing pH can be attributed to the cover effect, which reduces oxygen ingress, thus sulphide oxidation, causing pH to elevate. Due to the fact that pH~4–5 is sufficient for secondary Fe- and Al-mineral precipitation which also removes toxic elements (such as Cd, Co, Cu, Zn and Ni) by adsorption and/or co-precipitation, the FA cover performs well enough to achieve that pH until the conclusion of the CLE. However, due to the slower reactivity of the buffering system (additional to the initial flush-out), leaching in the beginning could not be restricted. The co-disposal of FA as cover and/or mixture possesses potential for neutralisation of AMD and improving leachate quality significantly. Particle size of the WRs affected the leaching of the sulphide related elements (such as Fe, S, Zn, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn and Ni) in CLE and WCE. Experiments with ≤1mm particle size constantly produced acidic and metal laden leachates. Co-disposal of FA and WRs as cover and mixture need to be investigated on pilot-scales before full-scale application.
|
Page generated in 0.0513 seconds