Numerous theories have been developed in explanation of object perception, such as Feature Integration Theory, which posits that an object is perceived after two stages: a pre-attentive stage and a focused attention stage. It is during the focused attention stage that a representation of the perceived object is formed. Theories such as object file theory account for the maintenance of these object representations following their creation. Evidence for object file theory has been provided by studies of the object specific preview benefit. This thesis seeks to examine the effect that dividing attention has on the maintenance of object representations. Using the tenets of object file theory and the cortical field hypothesis for dual task interference, it is hypothesized that by presenting participants with two simultaneous tasks which make use of overlapping cortical areas the object representation initially formed will be lost resulting in the loss of the object specific preview benefit. Whereas presenting participants with two simultaneous tasks which are associated with spatially separate, or non-overlapping, cortical regions will not result in the loss of the object specific preview benefit.

Decades of research suggest that talking on a cell phone interferes with driving performance, but the underlying mechanisms of this interference remain poorly understood. Driving and cell phone research often generalizes easy, novice laboratory tasks to the well practiced task of driving, and it frequently ignores important factors like emotion in tasks used to represent cell phone conversation. This experiment sought to address these issues. Participants performed a tracking task and two verbal tasks over 7 one-hour sessions. At some times the tasks were performed individually, and at others the tracking task was performed concurrently with one of the verbal tasks. Participants watched an anger-inducing film clip at the beginning of the 7th session and were instructed to either down-regulate or maintain that anger. Results challenged the validity of generalizing easy novice task performance to driving performance.

abstract: INTRODUCTION: As people age, they become increasingly susceptible to falls, particularly when their attention is divided. Cognitive domains such as executive functioning and processing speed also decline over time and are associated with falls. A critical aspect to reducing falls are reactive steps, which are used to recover balance after a perturbation. Characterizing the relationship between cognition, dual tasking, and prioritization is necessary in order to decrease fall risk in older adults. Thus, the purpose of this analysis was to determine the effects of baseline cognitive status on dual task interference and prioritization of postural and cognitive tasks while reactive stepping. METHODS: 30 participants (Parkinson's disease (PD) n=16, healthy controls (HC) n=14) were divided into two groups based on their baseline cognitive status: the high-cog group (n=18) or the low-cog group (n=12). All participants experienced 7 perturbation trials where they were solely tasked with reactive stepping, 2 cognitive trials where they were solely tasked with verbally responding to an auditory Stroop test, and 7 trials that combined the two tasks. Cognitive and protective stepping performance was calculated for dual task interference and prioritization across groups. RESULTS: There were no outcome variables that showed the log-cog group performing worse than the high-cog group from single to dual task conditions. While examining the dual task interference between groups, the only significant outcome was that the low-cog group exhibited a subtle improvement in their step length performance under dual task conditions while the high-cog group did not. When comparing the prioritization scores, there was no statistically significant difference in prioritization between the high-cog and low-cog group. Albeit not significant across groups, the prioritization score for all outcomes was negative, indicating a stepping prioritization under dual task conditions for both groups. This analysis provides preliminary evidence that baseline cognitive status does not significantly affect dual task interference nor prioritization while reactive step dual tasking. While these effects should be treated with caution, these results would suggest that baseline cognitive status may not play a critical role in dual task interference or attentional allocation in both people with PD and healthy older adults. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Exercise and Wellness 2020

Thèse numérisée par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal.

Thèse numérisée par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal