- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 (0.068 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"dualistic pairs"" "subject:"ualistic pairs""
| 1 |
The divine sphere according to John 3:1-10Karyakin, Pavel 11 1900 (has links)
According to the research, emphatic "Greek text" tells about
confidence of Nicodemus in possession of trustworthy criteria, which allow him to judge what
might be from God and, hence, what might not be from God. Epistemological premise of
Nicodemus is the starting point for the whole conversation in Jn 3:1-21. Analysis of the Jewish
literary tradition that used dualistic couples of antonyms to denote "otherness" of the divine sphere
1ms shown that ontological difference (v. 6) makes it impossible for human ("flesh") to know the
divine sphere ("spirit"). This results in the fact that manifestations of the divine sphere (effect) are
falsely taken by human for the divine sphere itself (cause). In other words, just verification of the
divine sphere manifestation without initiative act on behalf of God does not allow human neither to
correctly value this sphere, nor to enter it. / New Testament / M. Th. (New Testament)
|
| 2 |
The divine sphere according to John 3:1-10Karyakin, Pavel 11 1900 (has links)
According to the research, emphatic "Greek text" tells about
confidence of Nicodemus in possession of trustworthy criteria, which allow him to judge what
might be from God and, hence, what might not be from God. Epistemological premise of
Nicodemus is the starting point for the whole conversation in Jn 3:1-21. Analysis of the Jewish
literary tradition that used dualistic couples of antonyms to denote "otherness" of the divine sphere
1ms shown that ontological difference (v. 6) makes it impossible for human ("flesh") to know the
divine sphere ("spirit"). This results in the fact that manifestations of the divine sphere (effect) are
falsely taken by human for the divine sphere itself (cause). In other words, just verification of the
divine sphere manifestation without initiative act on behalf of God does not allow human neither to
correctly value this sphere, nor to enter it. / New Testament / M. Th. (New Testament)
|
Page generated in 0.072 seconds