Spelling suggestions: "subject:"examinations"" "subject:"reexaminations""
1 |
A study of Saudi Arabian official examination in the sixth, ninth, and twelfth gradesBāqādir, Abū Bakr Aḥmad. January 1976 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 56-57).
|
2 |
Effect upon learning of student knowledge and acceptance of behavioral objectivesGibson, Terry Lee, January 1973 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1973. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.
|
3 |
A comparative study of three item bias detection techniquesMack, Joanne Schateen. January 1982 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1982. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 29-31).
|
4 |
To meet or not to meet standard : proficiency estimation using different polytomous IRT models /Beretvas, Susan Natasha. January 2000 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2000. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 86-89).
|
5 |
A comparative analysis of the objectivity of essay and multiple-choice items in informal testing.Harreld, Jerry Douglas. January 1970 (has links)
Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Tulsa, 1970. / Bibliography: leaves 54-56.
|
6 |
Comparing 12 finite state models of examinee performance on multiple-choice tests /Zin, Than Than, January 1992 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1992. / Vita. Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 94-96). Also available via the Internet.
|
7 |
Reliability and validity of multiple choice examinations as a function of the number of options per item and student ability /Trevisan, Michael S., January 1990 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1990. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [83]-85).
|
8 |
The effects of non-repeated single-unit, non-repeated cumulative, and repeated single-unit testing procedures on comprehensive final examination performanceRohm, Rosalie Ann January 1984 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of three testing procedures on comprehensive final examination performance. The 64 undergraduates used as subjects were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a non-repeated single-unit, a non-repeated cumulative, or a repeated single-unit testing procedures. Subjects in the non-repeated testing procedures were administered a weekly multiple-choice test taken from content covering either (a) the most recent material or (b) all the material to-date. Subjects in the repeated testing procedure were administered up to three alternate forms of a multiple-choice test taken from content covering the most recent material. The dependent measure was a comprehensive 100 item multiple-choice test. Grade point average was used as a covariate.An Analysis of Covariance was applied to determine whether there was a significant difference between (a) the means of the non-repeated cumulative and the repeated single-unit procedures, and (b) the average mean of these two procedures and the mean of the non-repeated single-unit procedure. The .01 level was used for judgments about statistical significance.Findings1. No significant difference was found between the mean final examination score obtained by the students in the non-repeated cumulative and the repeated single-unit testing groups after the effects of the covariate were partialled out.2. No significant difference was found when the average of the final examination scores obtained by the non-repeated cumulative and the repeated single-unit groups was compared to the mean final examination score obtained by the non-repeated single-unit group.3. The subjects in the repeated single-unit testing group obtained a significantly greater number of points on the examinations administered throughout the quarter.Conclusions1. Previously reported differences between repeated versus non-repeated and repeated versus cumulative testing on final examination performance may be reflecting only differences in testing frequency.2. The higher grades obtained by students given multiple opportunities to "master" material may not reflect actual end-of-course achievement by a comprehensive final.3. To aid in the valid interpretation, generalizability, replication and synthesis of research findings, detailed descriptions of the independent and dependent variables used in testing procedures research seem warranted.
|
9 |
A comparison of kernel equating and item response theory true score equatingHuang, Min, Osterlind, Steven J. January 2009 (has links)
Title from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on Feb 24, 2010). The entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file. Dissertation advisor: Dr. Steven J. Osterlind. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
10 |
A comparison of Kernel Equating to the Test Characteristic Curve methodNorman Dvorak, Rebecca L. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2009. / Title from title screen (site viewed July 21, 2009). PDF text: vi, 123 p. : col. ill. ; 2 Mb. UMI publication number: AAT 3350452. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in microfilm and microfiche formats.
|
Page generated in 0.0791 seconds