Spelling suggestions: "subject:"effectiveness guidance document"" "subject:"affectiveness guidance document""
1 |
Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trialsWitt, Claudia, Aickin, Mikel, Baca, Trini, Cherkin, Dan, Haan, Mary, Hammerschlag, Richard, Hao, Jason, Kaplan, George, Lao, Lixing, McKay, Terri, Pierce, Beverly, Riley, David, Ritenbaugh, Cheryl, Thorpe, Kevin, Tunis, Sean, Weissberg, Jed, Berman, Brian, Collaborators January 2012 (has links)
BACKGROUND:There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) to strengthen the evidence base for clinical and policy decision-making. Effectiveness Guidance Documents (EGD) are targeted to clinical researchers. The aim of this EGD is to provide specific recommendations for the design of prospective acupuncture studies to support optimal use of resources for generating evidence that will inform stakeholder decision-making.METHODS:Document development based on multiple systematic consensus procedures (written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders including patients, clinicians and payers were involved.RESULTS:Recommendations focused mainly on randomized studies and were developed for the following areas: overall research strategy, treatment protocol, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication.CONCLUSION:The present EGD, based on an international consensus developed with multiple stakeholder involvement, provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER on acupuncture.
|
2 |
Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus documentWitt, Claudia, Aickin, Mikel, Cherkin, Daniel, Che, Chun, Elder, Charles, Flower, Andrew, Hammerschlag, Richard, Liu, Jian-Ping, Lao, Lixing, Phurrough, Steve, Ritenbaugh, Cheryl, Rubin, Lee, Schnyer, Rosa, Wayne, Peter, Withers, Shelly, Zhao-Xiang, Bian, Young, Jeanette, Berman, Brian, Collaborators January 2014 (has links)
BACKGROUND:There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) on Chinese medicine (CM) to inform clinical and policy decision-making. This document aims to provide consensus advice for the design of CER trials on CM for researchers. It broadly aims to ensure more adequate design and optimal use of resources in generating evidence for CM to inform stakeholder decision-making.METHODS:The Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) development was based on multiple consensus procedures (survey, written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, researchers and payers were involved in creating this document.RESULTS:Recommendations were developed for "using available data" and "future clinical studies". The recommendations for future trials focus on randomized trials and cover the following areas: designing CER studies, treatments, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication.CONCLUSION:The present EGD provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER trials on CM and can be applied to single or multi-component treatments. While CONSORT statements provide guidelines for reporting studies, EGDs provide recommendations for the design of future studies and can contribute to a more strategic use of limited research resources, as well as greater consistency in trial design.
|
Page generated in 0.0905 seconds