• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 205
  • 143
  • 39
  • 24
  • 10
  • 10
  • 10
  • 10
  • 10
  • 10
  • 5
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 520
  • 107
  • 77
  • 51
  • 36
  • 36
  • 34
  • 33
  • 33
  • 33
  • 32
  • 29
  • 28
  • 28
  • 26
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
191

Pipeline Flow Behavior of Water-In-Oil Emulsions

Omer, Ali January 2009 (has links)
Water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions consist of water droplets dispersed in continuous oil phase. They are encountered at various stages of oil production. The oil produced from an oil-well usually carries a significant amount of water in the form of droplets. In enhanced oil recovery techniques involving the injection of polymer solution, the aqueous phase of the water-in-oil emulsions produced from the oil well consists of polymeric additive. A good understanding of the flow behavior of emulsions in pipelines is essential for the design and operation of oil production-gathering facilities and emulsion pipelines. A number of studies have been reported on simultaneous flow of oil and water in pipelines. However, the studies reported in the literature are mainly focused on either oil-water flow patterns and separated flows (annular and stratified flow of oil and water phases) or oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion flows. The pipeline flow of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions has received less attention. Also, little work has been carried out on the effect of additives such as polymer. In this study, new experimental results are presented on the pipeline flow behavior of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions, with and without the presence of polymeric additive in the aqueous phase. The emulsions were prepared from three different oils, namely EDM-244, EDM-Monarch, and Shell Pella of different viscosities (2.5 mPa.s for EDM-244, 6 mPa.s for EDM-Monarch, and 5.4 mPa.s for Shell Pella, at 25 0C). The water-in-oil emulsions prepared from EDM-244 and EDM-Monarch (without any polymeric additive in the dispersed aqueous phase) exhibited drag reduction behavior in turbulent flow. The turbulent friction factor data of the emulsions fell well below the standard Blasius equation for smooth pipes. The water-in-oil emulsions prepared from EDM-244 exhibited stronger drag reduction as compared with the EDM-Monarch emulsions. The Shell Pella emulsions (w/o type) did not exhibit any drag reduction in turbulent flow; the friction factor data followed the Blasius equation. The Shell Pella emulsions were more stable than the EDM-244 and EDM-Monarch emulsions. When left unstirred, the EDM-244 and EDM-Monarch emulsions quickly coalesced into separate oil and water phases whereas the Shell Pella emulsions took significantly longer time to separate into oil and water phases. The Shell Pella oil emulsions were also milkier than the EDM emulsions. The addition of polymer to the dispersed aqueous phase of water-in-oil emulsions had a significant effect on the turbulent drag reduction behavior. Emulsions were less drag reducing when polymer was present in the aqueous droplets. The effect of surfactant on the pipeline flow behavior of water/oil emulsions was also investigated. The surfactant-stabilized water-in-oil emulsions followed the single phase flow behavior. The presence of surfactant in the emulsions caused the dispersed droplets to become significantly smaller. It is believed that the droplets were smaller than the scale of turbulence when surfactant was present and consequently no drag reduction was observed.
192

Effects of Mixed Stabilizers (Nanoparticles and Surfactant) on Phase Inversion and Stability of Emulsions

Malhotra, Varun January 2009 (has links)
Immiscible dispersions of oil and water are encountered in many industries such as food, pharmaceuticals, and petroleum. Phase inversion is a key phenomenon that takes place in such systems whereby the dispersed phase and the continuous phase invert spontaneously. Stabilizers such as surfactants or solid nanoparticles have been used in the past to improve the stability of emulsions. However, the combined effects of surfactants and nanoparticles on phase inversion and stability of oil and water emulsions have not been studied. This study investigates the synergistic effects of silica nanoparticles (of varying hydrophobicities) and non-ionic surfactant on phase inversion of water-in-oil emulsion to oil-in-water emulsion. The effect of oil viscosity on phase inversion phenomenon is also studied. Stabilizers were initially dispersed in the oil phase with the help of a homogenizer. The water concentration of the system was gradually increased while maintaining the mixing. Online conductivity measurements were carried out to obtain the phase inversion point. Experimental results on the effects of pure stabilizers (either silica nanoparticles or surfactant) and mixed stabilizers (combined silica nanoparticles and surfactant) on phase inversion of emulsions are presented. The stability of these emulsions is also investigated. From the results obtained in this study it is clear that catastrophic phase inversion phenomenon and stability of water-in-oil emulsions can be controlled with the help of different stabilizers. In order to extend the critical dispersed phase volume fraction at which phase inversion occurs surfactant type stabilizer was found to be more effective than solid nanoparticles. On the other hand, emulsion stability was mainly dominated by solid nanoparticles. The hybrid of the two stabilizers and its effect on phase inversion and stability are discussed in the thesis.
193

Pipeline Flow Behavior of Water-In-Oil Emulsions

Omer, Ali January 2009 (has links)
Water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions consist of water droplets dispersed in continuous oil phase. They are encountered at various stages of oil production. The oil produced from an oil-well usually carries a significant amount of water in the form of droplets. In enhanced oil recovery techniques involving the injection of polymer solution, the aqueous phase of the water-in-oil emulsions produced from the oil well consists of polymeric additive. A good understanding of the flow behavior of emulsions in pipelines is essential for the design and operation of oil production-gathering facilities and emulsion pipelines. A number of studies have been reported on simultaneous flow of oil and water in pipelines. However, the studies reported in the literature are mainly focused on either oil-water flow patterns and separated flows (annular and stratified flow of oil and water phases) or oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion flows. The pipeline flow of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions has received less attention. Also, little work has been carried out on the effect of additives such as polymer. In this study, new experimental results are presented on the pipeline flow behavior of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions, with and without the presence of polymeric additive in the aqueous phase. The emulsions were prepared from three different oils, namely EDM-244, EDM-Monarch, and Shell Pella of different viscosities (2.5 mPa.s for EDM-244, 6 mPa.s for EDM-Monarch, and 5.4 mPa.s for Shell Pella, at 25 0C). The water-in-oil emulsions prepared from EDM-244 and EDM-Monarch (without any polymeric additive in the dispersed aqueous phase) exhibited drag reduction behavior in turbulent flow. The turbulent friction factor data of the emulsions fell well below the standard Blasius equation for smooth pipes. The water-in-oil emulsions prepared from EDM-244 exhibited stronger drag reduction as compared with the EDM-Monarch emulsions. The Shell Pella emulsions (w/o type) did not exhibit any drag reduction in turbulent flow; the friction factor data followed the Blasius equation. The Shell Pella emulsions were more stable than the EDM-244 and EDM-Monarch emulsions. When left unstirred, the EDM-244 and EDM-Monarch emulsions quickly coalesced into separate oil and water phases whereas the Shell Pella emulsions took significantly longer time to separate into oil and water phases. The Shell Pella oil emulsions were also milkier than the EDM emulsions. The addition of polymer to the dispersed aqueous phase of water-in-oil emulsions had a significant effect on the turbulent drag reduction behavior. Emulsions were less drag reducing when polymer was present in the aqueous droplets. The effect of surfactant on the pipeline flow behavior of water/oil emulsions was also investigated. The surfactant-stabilized water-in-oil emulsions followed the single phase flow behavior. The presence of surfactant in the emulsions caused the dispersed droplets to become significantly smaller. It is believed that the droplets were smaller than the scale of turbulence when surfactant was present and consequently no drag reduction was observed.
194

The uniformity of substitution during the emulsion xanthation of cellulose and the solution properties of the corresponding diethylacetamide derivatives

Cornell, Richard Henry 01 January 1960 (has links)
No description available.
195

The uniformity of substitution during the emulsion xanthation of cellulose and the solution properties of the corresponding diethylacetamide derivatives

Cornell, Richard Henry. January 1960 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Institute of Paper Chemistry, 1960. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 96-101).
196

Carbon dioxide and water emulsion stability and rheology with nonionic hydrocarbon surfactants or particles

Adkins, Stephanie Sue 21 April 2015 (has links)
For the first time the interfacial properties of nonionic hydrocarbon surfactants at both the air-water and CO₂-water interfaces are investigated in terms of surfactant structure to determine the changes in surfactant efficiency (negative of the logarithm of the surfactant concentration to create a surface pressure of 20 mN/m). At the air-water interface, linear surfactant tails are more efficient due to the higher packing ability of the straight chains in the dense surfactant monolayer. However, at the CO₂-water interface, surfactant adsorption is small and tails can be solvated. Thus, branching which increases both tail solvation and tail hydrophobicity also enlarges the hard disk area of the surfactant to ultimately increase the efficiency of the surfactant at the CO₂-water interface. CO₂-in-water concentrated emulsions (foams) are studied over short and long times to evaluate the foam stability as a function of both surfactant structure and foam conditions using in-situ optical microscopy. The surface pressure measured at the CO₂- water interface is correlated with the short time stability of coalescing foams with very small cell sizes (under 0.4 [mu]m in diameter). Long time stability of bubbles to coalescence is shown under a variety of conditions. The rheology of these bulk CO₂-in-water foams under high-pressure conditions are also evaluated through measurements of the pressure drop over a capillary tube. Viscosities in excess of 200 cP are measured, an increase of over 1000 time that of pure CO₂ (0.09 cP at 24 °C and 2000 psia). The viscosity of the C/W foams are found to correlate with bubble size, continuous phase viscosity, shear rate, and interfacial tension. Hydrophobic silica particles adsorbed at the interface are also used to stabilize water-in-CO₂ emulsions as an alternative to surfactant stabilizers. The difficulties of tail solvation associated with many hydrocarbon surfactants in CO₂ can be removed by using particles instead of surfactant. A porous cross-linked shell is formed about the hydrophilic (colloidal and fumed) silica to render the particles CO₂-philic and the crosslinking removes ligand tails from the particle surface. / text
197

Stabilization of dispersions in carbon dioxide and in other low-permittivity media

Smith, Peter Griffin 28 August 2008 (has links)
Not available / text
198

Elasticity of Compressed Emulsions

Guerra, Rodrigo Emigdio 04 June 2015 (has links)
The interfaces of bubbles and droplets imbue foams and emulsions with extraordinary mechanical and chemical properties. The remarkably large interfacial area of these structures controls their thermodynamics and makes them practical and functional materials. When these interfaces are forced to touch, they can turn a dispersion of one fluid in another into a solid. These solid-like properties are evident in common household products such as shaving foam and mayonnaise, and our ability to control the fluid and solid properties of these materials is essential to their function. / Physics
199

Relationship between interfacial properties and formation of microemulsions and emulsions of water and supercritical carbon dioxide

Psathas, Petros 31 March 2011 (has links)
Not available / text
200

Development of protein-polysaccharide complex for stabilization of oil-in-water emulsions

Kasran, Madzlan 05 February 2013 (has links)
Soy whey protein isolate (SWPI) – Fenugreek gum conjugates were developed and their molecular characteristics and emulsifying properties were investigated. SWPI was extracted from soy whey of tofu processing. SWPI exhibited excellent emulsifying properties comparable to soy protein isolate. However, to improve the emulsifying properties of SWPI for some applications, it was conjugated to fenugreek gum. The extent of conjugation was verified by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and High performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC). The SDS-PAGE of the conjugates showed polydispersed bands at the top of the separating gel in the conjugates suggesting the formation of high molecular weight products. Refractive index spectrum of HPSEC profiles showed a reduction of protein peak of unconjugated mixture and shifted a peak to higher molecular weight of the conjugates. Ultraviolet spectrum of HPSEC showed an increase of protein peak intensity at polysaccharide region. FTIR spectrum showed an amide band I and II were still observed in the conjugates after the unreacted proteins were removed. 1D NMR spectra showed that fenugreek gum was covalently bound to proteins through interaction between the reducing end of mannose residue and lysine. The protein solubility of SWPI – Fenugreek gum conjugates improved as compared to SWPI and SWPI – Fenugreek gum mixture when assessed in the pH range 3 to 8 at 22oC, especially at isoelectric point of protein (pl). A 1:3 and 1:5 ratio of SWPI – Fenugreek gum gave rise to better emulsion stabilization compared to 1:1 ratio. Particle size analysis revealed that conjugation of SWPI – Fenugreek gum at 60oC for 3 days was enough to produce relatively small droplet sizes in oil-in-water emulsions. SWPI – Unhydrolyzed fenugreek gum conjugates exhibited better emulsifying properties compared to SWPI – Partially hydrolyzed fenugreek gum conjugates. The conjugates improved emulsifying properties of SWPI, particularly around the pl of protein. The emulsifying properties were greatly increased by heating the conjugates before emulsification. The conjugates also improved emulsion stability at high salt concentration compared to SWPI. In summary, incorporation of SWPI into fenugreek gum improved emulsifying properties of SWPI near the pl of protein and at high salt concentration. / No / No

Page generated in 0.0893 seconds