Ethiopia has two stories to tell: a fast progress and unfair distribution of the gains in child health care. Despite Ethiopia’s achievement in meeting MDG4, wealth-related mortality inequality increased by 1.5 for every 1,000 live births between 2000 and 2011. Two major dividing lines contribute to child health inequality in Ethiopia: place of residence and wealth status. Lack of proper studies on health inequality policy making is affecting the comprehensiveness and quality of inequality reduction in Ethiopia. This study wished to assess child health inequality and policy factors that affect progress in inequality reduction. Accordingly, the study explored policy-makers’ attitude and interest; policy contents, and institutions to make recommendations that promote child health equity in Ethiopia. The research is mainly a qualitative policy research. Conducted between 2013 and 2017, it was design based on health policy researching and health inequality theories. The researcher conducted semi-structured interviews among health policy makers; policy analysis; and a review of the literature. Twenty policy-makers, 15 policy documents, over 350 literatures were selected through purposing and theoretical open sampling methods. Data was synthesised and analysed with ATLAS.ti 7.1.4 through applying the tools of critical interpretive synthesis and ground theory. The study found that Ethiopia is in an early state of recognizing and intervening against health inequalities. The quality and level of knowledge is mixed and gets reduced as one goes far from the centre. Consensus is still growing on the major underlying causes of child health inequalities in Ethiopia. Most of the policy makers focus on down-stream factors than broader determinants of health. Wealth inequality is less discussed and intervened than geographical inequalities. The production of a new Plan of Action can helped to resolve the challenges of lack of detailed approaches that can help reduce the gap in Ethiopia. However, the content of the health policy documents is not comprehensive and based on global lessons. Policy makers from the central government in Ethiopia tend to reject the use of redistribute justice intervention as policy options. There were multiple reasons including: fear of sustainability, ethics and effectiveness were used to reject these interventions. However, leaders from DRS and DPs broadly support the proper adaption of these interventions. The recent surge of interest to address health inequalities is mainly led by small groups from the top leaders. The engagement of the middle level leaders, Developing Regional States (DRSs), civil society and development partners has been limited. The relation between different institutes is very important in the Ethiopian federal state to reduce inequality. Without an improved level of awareness; change in attitude; broader engagement of citizens; use of independent data source and review of resource distribution Ethiopia’s progress towards Universal Health Coverage in 2030 could get delayed. Finally, this research provided a list of recommend interventions that Ethiopia might take in its plan, to narrow down health inequalities among children by 2030. / Health Studies / D. Litt. et Phil. (Health Studies)