Division of labour is a hallmark of eusocial insects and is believed to be a major factor in their evolutionary success and ecological dominance. Division of labour can be of two kinds – reproductive division of labour where a minority of individuals are egg-layers or reproductives (kings and queens) and the majority are workers or non-reproductives involved mostly in non-reproductive tasks of the colony (workers). Kings/queens and workers are often referred to as separate castes within a social insect colony. There may be further non-reproductive division of labour within the worker caste, based on their morphology or age. In primitively eusocial organisms there is no morphological caste differentiation between the egg-layers and non-egg-layers resulting in greater flexibility in the social roles of individuals within a colony. This creates a very interesting scenario to study the mechanism of division of labour. Moreover our knowledge regarding division of labour especially non-reproductive division of labour is very limited for primitively eusocial organisms. In this thesis I have studied division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp species, Ropalidia cyathiformis. R. cyathiformis is a tropical primitively eusocial wasp with a perennial nesting cycle. This species usually has a single dominant queen and several workers. I studied reproductive and non-reproductive division of labour, as well as the role of dominance behaviour in the regulation of both reproductive and non-reproductive activities. In addition to this I have also compared my findings with what is already known in the well-studied congeneric species, Ropalidia marginata. Reproductive division of labour To understand reproductive division of labour in R. cyathiformis, I studied queen succession, by experimentally removing the queen. When the queen was removed, one and only one individual increased her aggression and became the new queen of the colony, unchallenged by any other worker. Such a successor was referred to as a potential queen (PQ) until she lays her first egg. By removing the queen and successive PQs, I showed that there is not just one successor but a strict reproductive hierarchy of up to 3 PQs, who succeed the queen one after the other. Of many variables tested, I found that only the frequency of dominance behaviour was a significant predictor of whether or not an individual is part of the reproductive hierarchy and also of her position in the hierarchy. Dominance behaviour however does not perfectly predict the position of an individual in the reproductive hierarchy because I showed that an average of three more dominant individuals, are bypassed when an individual becomes the next queen or PQ. This was in contrast to the reproductive hierarchy in the congeneric Ropalidia marginata, where age rather than dominance behaviour was a predictor (though imperfect once again) of an individual’s position in the queue. Taken together, my results suggest that (a) these two sister species have evolved two rather different mechanisms of reproductive caste differentiation, (b) that neither of them strictly conform either to the so called “temperate” or “tropical” patterns of queen succession seen in most other species studied so far. Non-reproductive division of labour As mentioned above, non-reproductive division of labour in eusocial insects is based on either the morphology or the age of the individuals within the colony. Since there is no morphological castes present in primitively eusocial species, I focussed on the effect of age on division of labour in R. cyathiformis. I analysed the frequency as well as the probability of performance of four functionally significant tasks namely, two intranidal tasks – feed larva and build as well as two extranidal tasks – bring food and bring building material. I measured absolute as well as relative ages of the wasps. I found that there is an effect of age on division of labour. Age of first performance of the tasks indicated a clear sequence for the initiation of the tasks with intranidal tasks initiated before extranidal tasks. The frequency of task performance (FTP) and absolute age better explained the variation in the data as compared to probability of task performance (PTP) and relative age. This was in contrast to the pattern of age polyethism found in the congeneric species, Ropalidia marginata, where PTP and relative age better explains the variation in the data. This suggests a more flexible age-dependant division of labour in R. marginata and a rigid age polyethism in R cyathiformis. In addition I found that there was no clear-cut partitioning of the intranidal and extranidal tasks in R. cyathiformis, whereas in R. marginata, it has been shown that the frequency of the intranidal tasks decline with age while that of extranidal tasks increase with age. When taken together, I could say that R. marginata has a more strongly developed age polyethism as compared to R. cyathiformis. This study also shows an evolution of age polyethism with R. cyathiformis behaving more like a typical primitively eusocial species while R. marginata more like a highly eusocial species. Role of dominance behaviour in reproductive and non-reproductive division of labour When reproductive regulation in R. cyathiformis was studied, I found that queens of this species target the potential queen (PQ) by showing the maximum frequency per hour of dominance behaviour to the PQ. The PQs on the other hand seem to show the maximum amount of dominance behaviour towards newborns (wasps of age class 0-5 days). Queens seem to regulate only reproductive activities and not the non-reproductive activities as there was no difference in the frequency of both feed larva and bring food behaviour in the colony even after removing the queen. It also appears that dominance behaviour is not used to signal hunger or regulate foraging as there was no significant correlation between the frequency per hour of bring food behaviour and dominance behaviour received. Moreover the foragers do not receive more aggression than other wasps in the colony from either the queen, PQ or intranidal workers. I also found a significant positive correlation between the frequency per hour of bring food behaviour and feed larva behaviour implying that foraging might be a self-regulated process in this species. Hence in R. cyathiformis it appears that dominance behaviour is used only for regulation of reproductive division of labour and not for regulation of non-reproductive division of labour. This was in contrast to the congeneric species, R. marginata where the opposite has been shown to be true; the reproductive regulation is achieved by means of pheromones produced by the queen and work organisation follows a decentralised self-organised manner with intranidal workers signalling or regulating foragers using dominance behaviour. Comparison with Ropalidia marginata Ropalidia cyathiformis and Ropalidia marginata, although congeneric species co-existing in the same habitat, have evolved very different mechanisms for division of labour. R. marginata exhibiting features such as 1) presence of a docile queen 2) reproductive regulation by means of pheromones 3) strongly developed and flexible age polyethism 4) decentralised work organisation seem to be more similar to a highly eusocial organism than to a primitively eusocial species. R. cyathiformis on the other hand seems to exhibit several features typical to a primitively eusocial species, such as 1) presence of a dominant queen 2) reproductive regulation by physical means 3) relatively weak and rigid age polyethism 4) self-regulatory method of work organisation. Hence the two species seem to be at two different stages of evolution with R. marginata appearing to be intermediate between primitively and highly eusocial species.

In societies where all individuals are reproductively totipotent and yet, at a given time only one of them reproduces, it is interesting to examine the factor(s) that may influence and predict who will be the reproductive. I am investigating various behavioural, morphological and physiological parameters in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata, and their role in determining the current reproductive and her future successors. In several group-living species, especially in primitively eusocial ones, a strong link between behavioural dominance and reproductive dominance is observed. Hence, I am also investigating the possible determinants of behavioural dominance in R. marginata. I have carried out my study on artificially constituted pairs of wasps as well as in natural colonies in laboratory cages, which represent the founding phase and the established phase in the colony cycle, respectively. Chapter 1: Behavioural and Reproductive Dominance in Pairs of R. marginata Age and body size had no effect on behavioural dominance in pairs of R. marginata, whereas prior experience of behavioural dominance affected future dominance status, indicating presence of winner- and loser-effects. Dominance ranks are relatively stable. This is different from what has been found in colonies, where dominance ranks sometimes change on a daily basis. Body size had no effect, whereas age and behavioural dominance had a significant effect on reproductive dominance in pairs, with older individuals and more dominant individuals having a higher probability of becoming the reproductive. Since no relationship was found between age and behavioural dominance, we predict that the underlying mechanisms by which age and behavioural dominance affect reproductive dominance and independent of each other. This study gives a clear indication that age and behavioural dominance are important variables that determine the reproductive individual during the founding phase of the colony. Chapter 2: Comparison of Dominance Indices and Recommendations for their Use When several individuals interact with each other as in colonies, in a differential and sometimes in a preferential manner, it is difficult to attribute dominance ranks to individuals. Dominance indices are employed to simplify these interactions and rank individuals in dominance hierarchies. Since the rationale behind using a particular dominance index is seldom given in behavioural literature, a comparison of three dominance indices was carried out in second part of the thesis. Each index was gauged on how similar are its ranks as compared to other two indices. Indices were also compared based on the number of untied or unique ranks they attributed. The index that gave least number of ties in ranks was assumed to be better than others. In addition to data from R. marginata colonies, I used data from R. cyathiformis colonies (a congeneric species which behaves more like a typical primitively eusocial species), and artificial data sets, to increase variability in the interaction patterns. We found that each of the indices had their own advantages and disadvantages. In species like R. marginata and R. cyathiformis, where only a few pairs show interactions, and among those who do, very few show reversals, Frequency-based Dominance Index (FDI) is the recommended index of choice. Studies like these will help in understanding how dominance indices operate under certain situations before applying them to construct hierarchies. Chapter 3: Behavioural and Reproductive Dominance in Colonies of R. marginata Age does not affect behavioural dominance, whereas winner and loser effects exist in colonies of R. marginata, just as in pairs. When analysed in detail, I found that colonies of R. marginata showed fewer proportion of pairs interacting, and lower frequency/hour/pair of dominance-subordinate interactions as compared to experimentally paired individuals (from 1st chapter). However, the dominance displays and behaviours were much more intense and severe in colonies. After dominance hierarchies are already established in colonies, frequent need to show dominance behaviour may not arise, due to familiarity between interacting individuals. However, since individuals are possibly aware of each others’ strengths due to past interactions, dominance behaviours are much more severe when contests do happen. My results show that there might be some similarities in terms of determinants of behavioural dominance between pairs and colonies, but the expression of behavioural dominance is quite different. From earlier work it was already known that if the queen/reproductive of the colony disappears or is experimentally removed, one of the individuals shows extreme levels of aggression. This individual, referred to as the potential queen (PQ), will go on to become the next queen of the colony. Her behavioural profile, from the emergence till she establishes herself as the next queen have been well studied earlier. What was not known were the factor(s) that determine the identity of the PQ. It was also unclear what happens when the queen as well as the PQ are both removed, simultaneously or in quick succession. To test whether there is a longer reproductive hierarchy in R. marginata, the queen and the first potential queen of a nest were removed. I found that successive potential queens emerged as readily as the first potential queen, and with dominance profiles comparable to the first PQ, indicating that a reproductive hierarchy indeed exists, at least up to five PQ’s. It was also found that these potential queens were acceptable to all other individuals, as there was not a single act of behavioural dominance directed toward any potential queen. It was also observed that all PQs went on to become queens if the previous queen or PQ was not returned. When tested for various morphological, physiological, behavioural and life history traits (factors possibly influencing the position of an individual in the reproductive hierarchy), we found that age is the only variable that emerges as an important predictor of reproductive succession, with older animals having a higher chance to succeed as next queens of the colony, although even age is not an absolute predictor. Unlike in the pairs, in colonies of R. marginata behavioural dominance is not a good predictor of an individual’s ability to be the queen or the potential queens. The four most important findings of my study are: (i) the first demonstration of winner and loser effects in social insects; (ii) the demonstration that behavioural dominance influences reproductive dominance in pairs but not in colonies; (iii) demonstration of a long reproductive queue among individuals of a colony; and (iv) discovering that age is an important predictor of the identity of the queen and the future queens of the colony. I believe these findings will add significantly to our growing knowledge of the social biology of R. marginata. Finally, my work shows that pairs of R. marginata, representing the founding phase of the colony, behave more like a typical primitively eusocial species, whereas colonies which represent the established phase of the colony cycle behave more like highly eusocial species. Finding the characters of two different forms of sociality in the same species in different phases of the colony cycle makes R. marginata an excellent model system to study evolution of eusociality.

Many animals live in societies of varying degrees of organization. Some individuals in these societies seem to sacrifice their own fitness to increase the fitness of some others. Understanding the forces that mould the evolution of such altruistic behaviour has become a dominant theme in modern evolutionary biology. Primitively eusocial polistine wasps provide excellent model systems to study the evolution of altruism as they show high degrees of plasticity in their behaviour. Different individuals in the same population pursue different social strategies such as nesting alpne or nesting in groups. When wasps nest in groups, usually only one individual becomes the egg layer, while die rest assume the role of sterile workers. Why do the workers not become solitary foundresses and rear their own offspring instead of working to rear the brood of another individual? Here I have used the tropical primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata to explore some factors that might potentially favour the worker strategy over the solitary founding strategy. Workers in multiple foundress nests may benefit by rearing brood more closely related to them than their own offspring would be. However, from previous work on this species it is known that relatedness between sisters is rather low and that workers therefore rear quite distantly related brood. Therefore, I have concentrated on factors other than genetic relatedness that might potentially favour the worker strategy. A total of 145 naturally initiated nests with different numbers of foundresses was monitored over a period of 16 months, and their productivities were compared. Although the total colony productivity increased, the per capita productivity did not increase with increasing foundress numbers. Colonies with larger foundress numbers did not produce significantly heavier progeny and did not produce them significantly faster than colonies with fewer individuals. The conspecific usurpers preferred to usurp single foundress colonies more often than multiple foundress colonies. Therefore, protection from conspecific usurpers might be an advantage of multiple foundress associations. About 10% of the multiple foundress nests experienced queen turnovers. This provides a finite chance to reproduce and gain some individual fitness for workers, at some future point of time. Wasps may not be similar in their reproductive abilities and those who are less fertile might be joining others who are more fertile. Testing such a hypothesis would require that individuals who have chosen to be subordinate cofoundresses in multiple foundress associations are forced to nest alone. During this study a total of 77 nests was monitored. Cofoundresses forced to nest alone had significantly lower productivity than natural solitary foundresses and also queens of multiple foundress nests who were forced to nest alone. This suggested that wasps are not similar either in their reproductive ability or brood rearing ability or both. To ascertain which of the factors was responsible for lower productivity in cofoundresses, productivity of wasps isolated into laboratory cages was compared. There was no significant difference in the productivity of isolated cofoundresses and isolated queens. This suggests that wasps are not subfertile per se but probably differ in their foraging and brood rearing abilities. The certainty with which resources are brought into the nest and therefore, the certainty with which the mean per capita productivity is attained, provides an automatic benefit of group living according to the central limit theorem. This prediction was also tested. The coefficient of variation of mean per capita productivity decreased significantly with increasing foundress numbers. Behavioural observations on another 36 colonies, with different number of adults, showed that the coefficient of variation of food brought to the nest and the rate at which larvae were fed, decreased significantly with increasing number of adults. A computer simulation was used to find out the effect of group size on the variance in feed larva. Assuming that larvae cannot be starved for too long and cannot utilize more than a certain amount of food at a time, the fitness of larvae was found to increase with an increase in the number of adults attending the nest. Previous work on R. marginata has been largely confined to postemergence colonies. An attempt was made to look at and compare social organization in preemergence colonies with that of postemergence colonies. It was found that the egg layer was not the most dominant animal in the well-established preemergence colonies. There were no detectable differences in the social organization of the preemergence colonies (of this study) with that of postemergence colonies of the earlier studies. Perhaps my conclusions drawn from studying preemergence colonies are therefore applicable more widely to the species. It can be concluded that the apparent increased fitness of the worker strategy over solitary foundress strategy does not come from any increase in per capita productivity, but comes instead from (i) the greater predictability with which the mean per capita productivity is attained in larger colonies, (ii) the lower probabilities of usurpation of larger colonies, (iii) queen turnovers that provide opportunities for workers in multiple foundress colonies to gain some direct individual fitness and (iv) the lower brood rearing abilities of workers in multiple foundress nests that make the worker strategy the best of a bad job.

Social insects are the most dominant terrestrial fauna for the last 50 million years. This tremendous ecological success is accompanied by the fact that sociality has evolved multiple times independently and achieved highest degree of complexity in insect lineages. The remarkable social organization found in insect societies is the result of finely balanced cooperation and conflict among the colony members. A typical hymenopteran colony is characterised by one or a few queens monopolizing reproduction and several sterile workers co-operatively raising brood and performing colony activities. The colonies are often conceptualized as superorganisms where groups of cooperative workers are compared with organs in the body, each of which accomplish a particular task like brood care, foraging and defence. The choice of tasks is often regulated by a systematic age polyethism. As the queens monopolize reproduction, they serve as the sole suppliers of eggs in the colony. Therefore, loss or death of the queen creates a crucial void which exposes the colony to potential reproductive conflict for the position of egg-layer. This crisis is expected to be extreme in monogynous colonies. The situation is rescued only after a new queen is established, and the whole process is known as queen succession. I am interested in this crisis management, and my thesis deals with potential and realized conflicts associated with queen succession and behavioural strategies involved in resolution of these conflicts. The queen can be replaced in two ways - either by a newly eclosed specialized reproductive individual, which happens in highly eusocial hymenopterans, or by an existing member of the colony (worker), as it happens in primitively eusocial hymenopterans. Unlike in highly eusocial species, the workers of primitively eusocial species retain their ancestral capability of mating and activating ovaries to produce both sons and daughters, which makes them suitable for taking up the role of queen in their lifetime. Hence, primitively eusocial species provide a unique situation where loss or death of the queen might result in severe reproductive conflict as the queen can be replaced by any one of the existing workers. Strictly monogynous colonies of the tropical primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata provide ideal opportunities to study the reproductive conflict and its resolution associated with queen succession because the queen is frequently replaced by one of her nestmates resulting in a serial polygyny. These queens have highly variable tenures of queenship ranging from seven to over 200 days, which, together with the fact that they are replaced by a variety of relatives such as daughters, niece and cousins, suggests a potential reproductive conflict with variable degrees of complexity. I have divided my thesis in three parts which are as follows -Natural queen turnover: Previous works from this lab have tried to characterize the queen succession in R. marginata colonies by experimentally removing the queen from the colony. As this design involves the experimenter intervening at a random point of the colony cycle, the colony might not respond in the similar way as it might have done to a natural succession necessitated by loss or death of the queen. But rarity and unpredictability of natural queen turnovers made them difficult to study. Therefore, in this section, we gathered a dataset of long-term and opportunistic quantitative behavioural observations on eleven natural queen turnovers and compared them with available data on queen removal experiments. All our queen removal experiments resulted in a hyper-aggressive potential queen who gradually reduced her aggression, activated her ovaries and went on to become the unanimously accepted new queen of the colony if the original queen was not returned. Here we found a similar phenomenon in natural colonies where a single un-challenged potential queen took over the colony as new queen after the old queen was lost, died or was driven out of the colony. In some of the natural colonies, the transition was preceded by aggression shown by the potential queens towards their nestmates including the queens, which indicates that they might have pre-empted the transition. The potential queens in natural colonies started laying eggs much faster than in experimental colonies suggesting their physiological readiness for the transition. How does a colony respond to a declining queen?: As we could show that some of the potential queens might perceive the upcoming queen turnover, a fair prediction would be that they sense it through the declining fertility status of the queens. Therefore, we tried to ex-perimentally induce situations where the queen appears to be declining, expecting that it might lead to a queen turnover. The growing evidence suggests that R. marginata queen maintains her status by applying a pheromone on the nest surface by rubbing the tip of her abdomen. We knocked down the nest to deny the queen the surface for applying her pheromone, and argued that the queen would be overthrown as the workers would sense her as infertile. To our surprise, the queen maintained her status in six out of seven colonies by applying her pheromone on the entire surface of the cage. However, the effectively insufficient concentration of pheromone elicited aggression from workers towards the queen, and the queen retaliated back with aggression. These results suggest that the pheromone, being an honest signal of fertility, is extremely important for the queen for maintaining her reproductive monopoly, and the workers are able to perceive the decline of the queen from her pheromone. Queen-successor conflict over access to reproduction: Here we more explicitly looked at the potential reproductive conflict between the queen and her successor over access to direct reproduction. We used the theory of parent-offspring conflict proposed by Robert Trivers (1974) as the conceptual framework and adapted it to unravel the pat-tern of queen-successor conflict in R. marginata colonies. According to this idea, we expected that there should be a pre-conflict zone where the queen and the successor both would agree that the queen should continue to reproduce, followed by a conflict zone where the successor would try to takeover but the queen would hang on, finally followed by post-conflict zone where they both would agree that the successor should reproduce. To test this expectation, we maintained the queen and the potential queen on either side of a wire-mesh partition, each with randomly chosen half of the workers. It allowed the potential queen (successor) to establish herself and then we reintroduced the queen to her side of the mesh daily till the queen gave up. We could behaviourally characterise all three zones which always appeared in the expected sequence. The pre and post-conflict zones had no aggressive interaction between the queen and the potential queen, whereas the conflict zone was characterized by aggressive falling fight between them. This is our first success in experimentally creating overt conflict between the queen and her successor. Overall we can say, that the queens and the potential queens of R. marginata show great behvioural plasticity which might have been shaped by natural selection as an adaptation for conflict resolution. We could show that the potential queens sometimes can predict the upcoming transition and pre-pare themselves accordingly, whereas they can also react to an experimentally created sudden loss of queen by hugely elevating their aggression. The docile queens, on the other hand, maintain their reproductive monopoly by a pheromone, which is essentially a feature of highly eusocial species. But these docile queens have not lost their capability to show aggression and can use that to complement the insufficient concentration of her pheromone. This and the behaviour of potential queens in their establishment phase are strongly reminiscent of typical primitively eusocial species. We conclude that Ropalidia marginata is, perhaps, a particularly advanced primitively eusocial hymenopteran situated on an evolutionary continuum from primitive to highly eusocial species.