Our study investigates how training with sparse simulated data versus sparse real data affects image reconstruction. We compared on several criteria such as number of events, speed and high dynamic range, HDR. The results indicate that the difference between simulated data and real data is not large. Training with real data performed often better, but only by 2%. The findings confirm what earlier studies have shown; training with simulated data generalises well, even when training on sparse datasets as this study shows. / Vår studie undersöker hur träning med gles simulerad data och gles verklig data från en eventkamera, påverkar bildrekonstruktion. Vi tränade två modeller, en med simulerad data och en med verklig för att sedan jämföra dessa på ett flertal kriterier som antal event, hastighet och high dynamic range, HDR. Resultaten visar att skillnaden mellan att träna med simulerad data och verklig data inte är stor. Modellen tränad med verklig data presterade bättre i de flesta fall, men den genomsnittliga skillnaden mellan resultaten är bara 2%. Resultaten bekräftar vad tidigare studier har visat; träning med simulerad data generaliserar bra, och som denna studie visar även vid träning på glesa datamängder.

No description available.

The purpose of this thesis work was to develop a Hardware-in-the-Loop imaging setup that enables experimenting with an event-based and frame-based camera under simulated space conditions. The generated data sets were used to compare visual navigation algorithms in terms of an event-based and frame-based feature detection and tracking algorithm. The comparative analyses of the feature detection and tracking algorithms were used to get insights into the feasibility of event-based vision near-space space objects. Event-based cameras differ from frame-based cameras by how they produce an asynchronous and independent stream of events caused by brightness changes at each pixel instead of capturing images at a fixed rate. The setup design is based on a theoretical framework incorporating optical calculations. These calculations indicating the asteroid model needed to be scaled down by a factor of 3192 to fit inside the camera depth-of-view. This resulted in a scaled Bennu asteroid with a size of 16.44 centimeters.The cameras under testing conducted three experiments to generate data sets. The utilization of a feature detection and tracking algorithm on both camera data sets revealed that the absolute number of tracked features, computation time, and robustness in various scenarios of the frame-based camera algorithm outperforms the event-based camera algorithm. However, when considering the percentages of tracked features relative to the total detected features, the event-based algorithm tracks a significantly higher percentage of features for at least one key frame than the frame-based algorithm.  The comparative analysis of the experiments performed in space-simulated conditions during this project showed that the feasibility of an event-based camera using solely events is low compared to the frame-based camera.