• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Lists of potential diagnoses that final-year medical students need to consider: a modified Delphi study / 卒業時の医学生が想起すべき鑑別疾患候補リスト

Miyachi, Yuka 24 January 2022 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(医学) / 乙第13461号 / 論医博第2248号 / 新制||医||1055(附属図書館) / (主査)教授 古川 壽亮, 教授 松村 由美, 教授 永井 洋士 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM
2

International consensus on quality indicators for comprehensive assessment of dementia in young adults using a modified e-Delphi approach

O'Malley, M., Parkes, J., Stamou, Vasileios, La Fontaine Papadopoulos, Jenny H., Oyebode, Jan, Carter, J. 19 October 2020 (has links)
Yes / Objective: To develop guidance for clinicians about essential elements that can support clinical decision-making in the diagnostic workup of young onset dementia. Methods/design: Three iterations of a modified e-Delphi consensus survey comprising 23 international expert clinicians specialising in diagnosis of young onset dementia. Outcome measures: A priori consensus was pre-defined as 80% of experts ranking statements in the upper threshold on a seven-point Likert scale that ranged from “not important at all” to “absolutely essential” to diagnosis. Results: 80% consensus was reached on 48 statements that were rated as “absolutely essential” or “very important” to a comprehensive assessment of dementia in a younger adult. In order to inform a subsequent audit of clinical records in which compliance with these statements was assessed, the statements were divided into a Minimum Standard, (consisting of the 15 statements voted by all experts as being “absolutely essential” or “very important”) and a Gold Standard where 48 statements were voted by 80% of the experts as being “absolutely essential” or “very important”. The experts’ response rate across the three rounds was 91.3%. Conclusion: A Minimum Standard and Gold Standard have been created for the diagnostic workup of young onset dementia. The standards provide a clinically useful tool for decision-making, particularly for generalists and those with less experience in the field. The standards will be used to inform a UK case note audit of recently diagnosed patients with young onset dementia. / This work was supported by the Alzheimer's Society grant number 278 AS-PG-15b-034.
3

Early Psychosis and Trauma-Related Disorders: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Future Directions

Cragin, Casey A. 12 April 2017 (has links)
No description available.

Page generated in 0.066 seconds