Spelling suggestions: "subject:"exxon valdez lil spill, alaska, 1989"" "subject:"exxon valdez lil spill, flaska, 1989""
1 |
Effects of diet and crude oil ingestion on growth and biochemistry of captive-reared pigeon guillemots (Cepphus columba)Hovey, Andrew K. 01 October 2002 (has links)
The pigeon guillemot (Cepphus columba) population in Prince William
Sound has failed to recover from declines that occurred both before and after the
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (EVOS). Post-spill studies of pigeon guillemot breeding
biology have identified three potential factors limiting recovery: (1) predation on
eggs and nestlings; (2) declines in the proportion of high-lipid, schooling forage
fish (sand lance [Ammodytes hexapterus], herring [Clupea pallasi], and capelin
[Mallotus villosus]) in the diet; and (3) continued exposure to residual oil from the
spill. This laboratory study with captive-reared pigeon guillemots at the Alaska
SeaLife Center investigated two aspects of the species' biology that are relevant to
restoration in the aftermath of EVOS. First, we investigated the role of dietary
factors (prey type, quantity of food consumed, dietary fat content, and energy
intake rate) in limiting the growth, development, survival, and fledging condition of
nestling pigeon guillemots. The objective was to understand how changes in prey
availability and prey quality might affect pigeon guillemot productivity. Second,
we fed nestlings sublethal doses of weathered Prudhoe Bay crude oil (PBCO) and
then measured several potential biomarkers of effects from this pollutant. These
dose-response experiments were designed to (1) better understand the impact on
nestling guillemots of petroleum hydrocarbons in food, (2) calibrate existing and
potential biomarkers of exposure to PBCO in pigeon guillemots in a controlled,
laboratory setting, and (3) develop better nondestructive biomarkers of exposure to
PBCO in pigeon guillemots in particular, and seabirds in general.
Results of feeding experiments indicated that most variation in nestling
growth rates could be explained by variation in daily energy intake. The type of
forage fish consumed, the lipid or protein content of the forage fish, and even the
quantity of food consumed daily did not have as strong an effect on nestling
guillemot growth as did daily energy intake. The metabolic efficiency and growth
performance of nestling guillemots was not enhanced on high-lipid diets, contrary
to results with nestlings of some other seabird species. Instead, structural growth
(wing length) in nestling guillemots was somewhat stunted on high-lipid diets.
These attributes of guillemot nutritional requirements are associated with the
guillemots' nearshore foraging niche and high food provisioning rates to nestlings.
The average lipid content of sand lance, juvenile herring, and capelin may represent
the optimal dietary lipid content for nestling pigeon guillemots. This study supports
the hypothesis that guillemot productivity is limited by the availability of these forage fishes through effects on energy provisioning rates to nestling guillemots.
Consequently, recovery of pigeon guillemot populations injured by EVOS is likely
linked to recovery of these key forage fish stocks.
Results of the oil-dosing experiments indicated that nestling guillemots are
resistant to small doses of weathered PBCO in their food. No nestlings died or
suffered noticeable health effects following dosing. The high dose in this study (0.5
ml kg����� day�����) was sufficient to induce hepatic cytochrome P450A1 (a liver enzyme
indicative of contaminant exposure), but growth rate, fledging mass, and blood
chemistry were largely unaffected. None of the 12 plasma or hematological
markers examined responded in a dose-dependent manner to ingestion of weathered
PBCO, except lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Although baseline stress hormone
(corticosterone) levels were not different between oil-dosed and control nestlings, a
standardized acute stress protocol revealed that corticosterone was more elevated
during stress for oiled nestlings compared to controls. Although we were not
successful in identifying a noninvasive biomarker (e.g., growth) or a blood
biomarker (e.g., haptoglobin) of crude oil exposure in nestlings, we were able to
confirm that levels of hepatic cytochrome P4SO1AI and corticosterone during
stress were elevated by the sublethal doses administered during our experiments.
Based on this and other studies, it is unlikely that the failure of pigeon guillemots to
recover from EVOS is due to effects on nestling health of residual oil in food. / Graduation date: 2003
|
2 |
Behavioral constraints on harlequin duck population recovery from the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, AlaskaRizzolo, Daniel J. 05 February 2004 (has links)
I investigated the relationship between harlequin duck (Histrionicus
histrionicus) behavior and lack of recovery from the Exxon Valdez oil spill in
Prince William Sound, Alaska. First, I evaluated the hypothesis that harlequin
ducks in winter have little flexibility to increase foraging time in response to
disturbance because they are constrained to forage during daylight. Eight radio-tagged
harlequin ducks wintering in Resurrection Bay, Alaska were monitored for
evidence of dive-feeding at night. Each radio-tagged individual was detected
during an average of 19.5 of 22 nocturnal monitoring sessions and signal loss
indicative of diving behavior was not detected during a total of 780 minutes of
signal monitoring. In contrast, the same 8 radio-tagged birds were detected during
an average of 9.1 of 12 daytime signal monitoring sessions and signal loss
indicated diving behavior during an average of 62 �� 7% of 5-minute daytime
monitoring periods (total of 364 minutes of signal monitoring). Thus the harlequin
ducks monitored in this study rarely, if ever, fed by diving at night, possibly due to
reduced foraging efficiency and (or) increased predation risk at night. This result
suggests that harlequin ducks in mid-winter may be severely time-limited in their
foraging, especially in northern parts of their winter range. Therefore, subtle
changes in energy requirements and (or) time-activity budgets as a result of
continued exposure to residual oil from the Exxon Valdez oil spill may affect the
ability of harlequin ducks to meet their daily energy requirements.
Second, I tested the hypothesis that exposure to crude oil affects time-activity
budgets of harlequin ducks. Controlled oil-dosing and plumage-oiling
experiments were conducted using adult female harlequin ducks in captivity. I
found no evidence that ingestion of weathered Prudhoe Bay crude oil affected the
occurrence of feeding activity during 30-minute observation periods, nor was there
evidence of effects on time spent feeding. Effects of crude oil ingestion on
maintenance activity were detected, but were neither consistent between the 2 years
of the study, nor dose-dependent for the 2 doses administered (2 and 20 mL kg�����
wk�����), and therefore did not strongly support an oil-dosing effect on maintenance
activity. Consequently, these results provided little support for the hypothesis that
oil ingestion affects time-activity budgets of captive harlequin ducks, at least for
the doses and conditions of captivity used in this study. Plumage-oiling reduced
feeding activity in captive harlequin ducks. The estimated probability of feeding
during 30-minute observation periods for birds in the high-exposure oiling group (5
mL of crude oil) was 53% less than that of non-oiled controls. Oiled birds
exhibited a trend of reduced time feeding with increasing level of external-oiling;
this effect was greatest among birds in the high-exposure oiling group, which spent
43% less time feeding than non-oiled birds. Reduced feeding was associated with
less time in the water dive-feeding and presumably lower heat loss. Trends in the
occurrence of maintenance activity and time spent in maintenance activity for birds
in the high-exposure treatment suggested plumage-oiling increased maintenance
activity, but results were not conclusive. The behavioral changes associated with
plumage-oiling in captivity would likely reduce fitness in the wild, where a high
proportion of time must be spent in the water feeding. If residual Exxon Valdez oil
sequestered in beach sediments enters the water column where it may be
encountered by harlequin ducks, external exposure may lead to reduced feeding
activity. This, in turn, may compromise survival, particularly during mid-winter
when the time available for diurnal foraging is low and maintenance energy
requirements are high. / Graduation date: 2004
|
Page generated in 0.2398 seconds