Age, sex, race, heredity, environment and nutrition have been found to influence ametropia. In this study, the distribution of refractive errors has been investigated in relation to age, sex, race, education and near work, and lighting conditions. Visual awareness and vision screening in pre-school and schoolchildren were also investigated. Data were collected using the Nikon auto-refractor, retinoscope, Snellen V.A chart, and subjective techniques. 777 people were refracted, whose ages ranged between four and eighty years. Measurements were made in different sections of Umlazi township, therefore people of different socio-economic sectors were refracted. Four year-old children were found to be hyperopic. Hyperopia decreased and refraction shifted towards emmetropia. Myopia started to appear at the age of ten. Myopia increased until the age of twenty, and thereafter decreased slowly until the age of thirty three, where the average refraction was emmetropia. From age forty onwards, hyperopia was predominant. The incidence of high astigmatism, high hyperopia and high myopia is low in this community. Most people fall in the spherical refractive error region of between -1.000 and +1.000. The curve is leptokurtotic with highest peak around +0.250. The cylindrical error is between -0.500 and -1.000. No significant difference between sexes was found except at the fourth age group (40-51), where females are more hyperopic than males. The other sex difference is at ages ten to twelve, where females develop myopia earlier than males. Illumination plays no important role in the development of refractive errors in this community. Education and near work seem to account very little to the development of myopia. The influence of heredity on the development of ametropia was not investigated in depth. However, there is no evidence of heredity influencing the development of ametropia. There is a lack of vision screening and visual awareness. / Thesis (M.Optom.)-University of Durban-Westville, 1988.

Purpose: WHO reports 46% of world vision impairment from refractive error (RE) among children occurs in China. We estimated RE prevalence and associated vision impairment (VI) among Chinese children and adults. Methods: Data from population-based studies were stratified by gender in age intervals of 3 years (ages 3-17 y) or 10 years (ages >= 30 y): counts of persons with myopia (worse eye spherical equivalent <= -1.0D, <= -2.0D, <= -6.0D) and prevalence of low vision (< 6/12 in the better-seeing eye for children and < 6/18 for adults) and blindness (<=6/60) attributable to RE. Figures for VI included persons with habitual vision below the cutoff improving to above the cutoff with refraction, and those with myopic retinopathy. Estimates for ages 18-29 y were obtained from regression models derived from the pooled estimates. Prevalence of myopia and VI attributable to RE in each age/gender category was calculated by applying modeled rates to 2000 China census figures and projections for 2020. Association with VI attributable to RE was tested for: gender, urban versus rural residence, and residence in provinces with per capita GDP in the upper versus lower 50% for China. Results: Data were obtained from 5 cohorts for children and 14 for adults. There were 291 million and 21.4 million persons with myopia <= -1.0D and <= -6.0D respectively in 2000, expected to rise to 306 million and 36.9 million by 2020. Of these, 18.4 million were blind and 116 million had low vision in 2000, with figures of 25.3 million and 123 million in 2020. Children accounted for the following proportion of RE disease burden in China in 2000: myopia <= -1.0D: 19.0%; RE-associated low vision: 56.1%; blindness: 14.1%. Refractive error was responsible for 82.3% of blindness and 90.5% of low vision among children, and 11.6% and 64.4% of blindness and low vision among adults. Urban residence (OR 1.85, P = 0.004) and higher GDP (OR 10.6, P < 0.001) were associated with refractive blindness among children. For adults, lower GDP was associated with refractive blindness (OR 1.47, P = 0.01). Gender was un-associated with refractive blindness among children or adults. Conclusions: Both children and adults suffer a heavy burden of VI associated with RE in China. Income may affect risk for such VI differently among children and adults. / published_or_final_version / Public Health / Master / Master of Public Health

M.Phil. (Optometry) / Please refer to full text to view abstract

M.Phil. / Cataracts have been identified as one of the leading causes of blindness, especially in the developing world. The only presently known effective treatment for this growing problem is surgical removal of the opaque lens followed by replacement with an artificial intra ocular lens. Newer methods have brought greater success, and greater costs. For people in the developing world, these newer methods are not always an option. Together with the increased cost, there is a growing demand because of this worldwide problem. This increased need for surgery has lead to the development of waiting lists in the state funded hospitals. To qualify for a cataract extraction in most state funded hospitals, a best visual acuity of 6/60 is required, compared to the 6/12 to 6/24 levels required in the industrial countries and private practices. With these levels of visual impairment in the developing world, many patients are left functionally blind for long periods of time until cataract extraction can be performed. Older methods such as extra-capsular cataract extraction are still being used in the developing world. This is mostly due to the increased density of the cataracts at the time when the extraction can be performed because of the long waiting time leading to further maturation of the cataract. This method requires a large corneal incision, which is normally closed with nylon sutures. With this method of surgery meticulous wound closure is very important, and in many cases surgically induced astigmatism is one of the unwanted consequences. It was therefore decided, for the purpose of this study, to use autokeratometric data to explore the refractive effects of two different methods of corneal wound closure following planned extra-capsular cataract extraction (ECCE). Astigmatism is a major problem associated with extra capsular cataract extraction, especially when the wound is closed by means of sutures. Studies by Minassian et al. (2001), Jacobi (2003) and Dowler et al. (2000) all show that newer methods of cataract extraction making use of smaller incisions and therefore fewer sutures show faster recovery and less astigmatism. These methods are however mostly restricted to private practice, and therefore potentially unsuited for use in developing countries. The type of material used for wound closure is another very important factor. Depending on the method of suturing wound gape and wound compression can cause increased amounts of astigmatism. Using a method of wound closure that would cause less traction on the cornea could therefore cause less of a problem postoperatively. Tissue adhesives such as Tisseel® fibrin glue could be such an alternative. Studies by Henrick et al. (1987), Kim and Kharod (2007) and Bhatia (2006) show that fibrin glue forms a watertight, non irritating wound while promoting the healing process by the cross linking of collagen fibres.

Orientador: Silvana Artioli Schellini / Banca: Milton Ruiz Alves / Banca: Carlos Eduardo Leite Arieta / Banca: Maria Rosa Bet de Moraes Silva / Banca: Flávio Eduardo Hirai / Resumo: Determinar o perfil de distribuição dos erros refracionais em uma amostra populacional do centro-oeste do Estado de São Paulo, suas possíveis associações com características individuais e a influência sobre a acuidade visual. foi desenvolvido estudo de secção transversal com amostragem residencial probabilística e sistemática em nove municípios no sul do centro-oeste paulista, como parte do Projeto de Prevenção à Cegueira na Comunidade. Os indivíduos acima de um ano de idade foram submetidos a entrevista e exame oftalmológico completo. A acuidade visual em sistema Snellen e posterior conversão para logMAR foi obtida antes e após exame de refração e categorizada em quatro segmentos. Os erros refracionais foram classificados em miopia (EE ≤ - 0,50D), hipermetropia (EE ≥ 0,50D), astigmatismo (DC ≤ -0,50D) e anisometropia (diferença de EE ≥ 1,00D entre os olhos). Foi realizada a análise descritiva dos dados de prevalência na amostra, análise univariada e multivariada com modelos de regressão logística múltipla para determinar possíveis associações de prevalências. 3012 residências foram entrevistadas e 7654 indivíduos foram incluídos no estudo, sendo 62,7% mulheres, 92,1% considerados com pele branca e média para a idade de 36,89 anos (extremos de 1 a 96 anos). A miopia foi mais prevalente na terceira e quarta décadas de vida, atingindo 43,31% sem diferenças significativas entre sexos, enquanto a hipermetropia foi mais prevalente entre mulheres acima de 60 anos de idade, com uma frequência de 65,6% nesta faixa etária. O astigmatismo apresentou uma frequência progressivamente maior com a idade e semelhante entre os sexos. O eixo do astigmatismo também apresentou variação conforme a idade, com o eixo horizontal mais frequente em jovens e o vertical nos idosos. A prevalência da anisometropia apresentou variação com a idade sendo mais frequente nos extremos de idade, ... / Abstract: Establish the refractive errors distribution in a population sample of the Central São Paulo State, correlations with personal features and its influence in visual acuity. A cross sectional survey was developed with randomized and systematic residential sampling in nine cities of middle region of São Paulo St/Brazil as part of Blindness Prevention Project at Community. Inhabitants above one year old were submitted to an interview and full ophthalmic exam. Visual acuity in logMAR system was determined before and after refraction exam and classified in four categories. Refractive errors were classified in myopia (SE ≤ -0,50D), hyperopia (SE ≥ 0,50D), astigmatism (CD ≤ -0,50D) and anisometrophy (SE difference between eyes ≥ 1,00D). Prevalence data sample were submitted to descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to find eventual prevalence associations. 7654 participants were included in this survey, in which 62,7% were women, 92,1% with white skin and middle age of 36,89 years old (1 to 96 years). Myopia was more prevalent at 3rd and 4th decades, achieving 43,31% without significant differences between genders, while hyperopia was more prevalent in women above 60 years old, with 65,5%. Astigmatism prevalence increased by age with no differences between genders. Astigmatism axis changed by age too, when horizontal axis were more frequently observed in youngers and vertical in olders. Anisometrophy prevalence changed by age, more frequent at extremes, achieving 32,66% after 70 years old. No significant differences were found in ethnic categories. Visual acuity increasing prevalence by visual impairment corrected with spectacles (UREN) was 6,53% in the total sample, mainly after 60 years old and high refrective errors. Prevalence associations were found between age and all ametrophic categories, sex and hyperopia and between UREN with myopia, hyperopia and ... / Doutor

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:35:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013-05-17Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:05:13Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000741373.pdf: 4583650 bytes, checksum: 87f6f61f6501ebdd745502a6340efa62 (MD5) / Determinar o perfil de distribuição dos erros refracionais em uma amostra populacional do centro-oeste do Estado de São Paulo, suas possíveis associações com características individuais e a influência sobre a acuidade visual. foi desenvolvido estudo de secção transversal com amostragem residencial probabilística e sistemática em nove municípios no sul do centro-oeste paulista, como parte do Projeto de Prevenção à Cegueira na Comunidade. Os indivíduos acima de um ano de idade foram submetidos a entrevista e exame oftalmológico completo. A acuidade visual em sistema Snellen e posterior conversão para logMAR foi obtida antes e após exame de refração e categorizada em quatro segmentos. Os erros refracionais foram classificados em miopia (EE ≤ - 0,50D), hipermetropia (EE ≥ 0,50D), astigmatismo (DC ≤ -0,50D) e anisometropia (diferença de EE ≥ 1,00D entre os olhos). Foi realizada a análise descritiva dos dados de prevalência na amostra, análise univariada e multivariada com modelos de regressão logística múltipla para determinar possíveis associações de prevalências. 3012 residências foram entrevistadas e 7654 indivíduos foram incluídos no estudo, sendo 62,7% mulheres, 92,1% considerados com pele branca e média para a idade de 36,89 anos (extremos de 1 a 96 anos). A miopia foi mais prevalente na terceira e quarta décadas de vida, atingindo 43,31% sem diferenças significativas entre sexos, enquanto a hipermetropia foi mais prevalente entre mulheres acima de 60 anos de idade, com uma frequência de 65,6% nesta faixa etária. O astigmatismo apresentou uma frequência progressivamente maior com a idade e semelhante entre os sexos. O eixo do astigmatismo também apresentou variação conforme a idade, com o eixo horizontal mais frequente em jovens e o vertical nos idosos. A prevalência da anisometropia apresentou variação com a idade sendo mais frequente nos extremos de idade,... / Establish the refractive errors distribution in a population sample of the Central São Paulo State, correlations with personal features and its influence in visual acuity. A cross sectional survey was developed with randomized and systematic residential sampling in nine cities of middle region of São Paulo St/Brazil as part of Blindness Prevention Project at Community. Inhabitants above one year old were submitted to an interview and full ophthalmic exam. Visual acuity in logMAR system was determined before and after refraction exam and classified in four categories. Refractive errors were classified in myopia (SE ≤ -0,50D), hyperopia (SE ≥ 0,50D), astigmatism (CD ≤ -0,50D) and anisometrophy (SE difference between eyes ≥ 1,00D). Prevalence data sample were submitted to descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to find eventual prevalence associations. 7654 participants were included in this survey, in which 62,7% were women, 92,1% with white skin and middle age of 36,89 years old (1 to 96 years). Myopia was more prevalent at 3rd and 4th decades, achieving 43,31% without significant differences between genders, while hyperopia was more prevalent in women above 60 years old, with 65,5%. Astigmatism prevalence increased by age with no differences between genders. Astigmatism axis changed by age too, when horizontal axis were more frequently observed in youngers and vertical in olders. Anisometrophy prevalence changed by age, more frequent at extremes, achieving 32,66% after 70 years old. No significant differences were found in ethnic categories. Visual acuity increasing prevalence by visual impairment corrected with spectacles (UREN) was 6,53% in the total sample, mainly after 60 years old and high refrective errors. Prevalence associations were found between age and all ametrophic categories, sex and hyperopia and between UREN with myopia, hyperopia and ...

MPH / Department of Public Health / See the attached abstract below

This is a study on the prevalence of refractive errors and patients requiring refractive services at 15 eye clinics in the Amathole, Chris Hani, Joe Gqabi and OR Tambo District Municipalities of the Eastern Cape. This is an area characterised by extreme poverty where the cost of an eye examination and prescription spectacles remains financially unobtainable for most. Optometry services are provided mainly by private optometrists who service the small proportion of the population that can afford them. Adults and children remain house bound or are labelled as dull and unproductive simply because they don’t have access to an eye examination and a pair of spectacles. Purpose The purpose of the study is to identify patients with refractive errors and those requiring refractive services at the 15 eye clinics in the Eastern Cape. Another purpose is to describe the refractive services that are available to patients attending health facilities, where the eye clinics are conducted. Lastly, the purpose is to explore the possibility of nurses providing refractive services independently or under the supervision of optometrists to supplement the lack to refracting and dispensing services. Study Method A quantitative and qualitative non-experimental descriptive design was used. Research involved the analysis of Vision Care’s eye clinic records collected from 15 eye clinics from January 2010-June 2010. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 nurses working at the 15 health facilities where the eye clinics were conducted using purposive sampling. The quantitative data was analysed using excel spreadsheets and graphs and qualitative data was analysed using coding and categorizing methods. Conclusion According to Vision Care’s data of the patients assessed, 19.2 percent had a refractive error and 54 percent of the patients required refractive services. It is estimated that 71.41 percent of the patients had a refractive error according to the optometrist. Although there were some organisations active in the eradication of cataracts, there was little healthcare available in the form of refraction services. xiv Patients needed to travel an average of 63.8kms to access refraction services against the backdrop of poor roads, poverty and unemployment. 28 out of 30 nurses either ‘strongly agreed’ or ‘agreed’ that nurses could be trained to perform refractions and dispense spectacles. 29 out of 30 nurses thought that this would have a positive impact on eye care. Further research is necessary to assess the feasibility of implementing a nurse operated refractive program and whether it should be within their scope of practice to refract and dispense spectacles.

MPH / Department of Public Health / See the attached abstract below