Spelling suggestions: "subject:"3factor aanalysis."" "subject:"3factor 2analysis.""
41 |
Factor space versus common factor space and a technique for extracting all the factors /DeGaugh, Roy Allen January 1961 (has links)
No description available.
|
42 |
Examining the Autism Phenotype: The Structure of Autism Spectrum Disorders as Measured by the Autism Diagnostic Observation ScheduleNorris, Megan 22 October 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
43 |
A new approach to job classification using two-mode factor analysis /Harvey, Robert John January 1982 (has links)
No description available.
|
44 |
Quantitative analyses of factors involved in sensorimotor performances /Cho, Chungsoo Joseph January 1963 (has links)
No description available.
|
45 |
Investigation of moderator variables relative to the factor analytic model /Smith, Margaret Jane January 1963 (has links)
No description available.
|
46 |
An investigation into the functional relationships underlying the setting of two factor analysis termination criteria /Fritz, Kentner Von January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
47 |
A comparison of traditional and IRT factor analysis.Kay, Cheryl Ann 12 1900 (has links)
This study investigated the item parameter recovery of two methods of factor analysis. The methods researched were a traditional factor analysis of tetrachoric correlation coefficients and an IRT approach to factor analysis which utilizes marginal maximum likelihood estimation using an EM algorithm (MMLE-EM). Dichotomous item response data was generated under the 2-parameter normal ogive model (2PNOM) using PARDSIM software. Examinee abilities were sampled from both the standard normal and uniform distributions. True item discrimination, a, was normal with a mean of .75 and a standard deviation of .10. True b, item difficulty, was specified as uniform [-2, 2]. The two distributions of abilities were completely crossed with three test lengths (n= 30, 60, and 100) and three sample sizes (N = 50, 500, and 1000). Each of the 18 conditions was replicated 5 times, resulting in 90 datasets. PRELIS software was used to conduct a traditional factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlations. The IRT approach to factor analysis was conducted using BILOG 3 software. Parameter recovery was evaluated in terms of root mean square error, average signed bias, and Pearson correlations between estimated and true item parameters. ANOVAs were conducted to identify systematic differences in error indices. Based on many of the indices, it appears the IRT approach to factor analysis recovers item parameters better than the traditional approach studied. Future research should compare other methods of factor analysis to MMLE-EM under various non-normal distributions of abilities.
|
48 |
Measurement Invariance Relationships between Multilevel Factor Models and Multigroup Factor ModelsZhu, Jingdan January 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
49 |
A Comparison of Three Correlational Procedures for Factor-Analyzing Dichotomously-Scored Item Response DataFluke, Ricky 05 1900 (has links)
In this study, an improved correlational procedure for factor-analyzing dichotomously-scored item response data is described and tested. The procedure involves (a) replacing the dichotomous input values with continuous probability values obtained through Rasch analysis; (b) calculating interitem product-moment correlations among the probabilities; and (c) subjecting the correlations to unweighted least-squares factor analysis. Two simulated data sets and an empirical data set (Kentucky Comprehensive Listening Test responses) were used to compare the new procedure with two more traditional techniques, using (a) phi and (b) tetrachoric correlations calculated directly from the dichotomous item-response values. The three methods were compared on three criterion measures: (a) maximum internal correlation; (b) product of the two largest factor loadings; and (c) proportion of variance accounted for. The Rasch-based procedure is recommended for subjecting dichotomous item response data to latent-variable analysis.
|
50 |
Causal variables in quality of life measurementFayers, Peter Michael January 1997 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.2069 seconds