Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of St Andrews, May 2010.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Virginia Commonwealth University, 2010. / Prepared for: Dept. of Adult Health. Title from resource description page. Includes bibliographical references. Unavailable until may 27, 2015.

Thesis (M. Div.)--Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, 1997. / Abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [83]-93).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1988. / Includes prospectus. This is an electronic reproduction of TREN, #049- 0010. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 112-128; 175-190).

Thesis (M.T.S.)--Trinity Western Seminary, Langley, B.C., 1994. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 182-197).

Thesis (D.Phil.(Systematic Theology)--University of Pretoria, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 243-260)

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2007. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 93-103).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2007. / Title from PDF title page screen. Advisor: Hephzibah Roskelly; submitted to the Dept. of English. Includes bibliographical references (p. 149-156).

MARQUES, José da Cruz Lopes. O escândalo da razão diante do paradoxo da fé em Soren Kierkegaard. 2016. 134f. – Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia, Fortaleza (CE), 2016. / Submitted by Márcia Araújo (marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-03-28T14:46:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_dis_jclmarques.pdf: 506864 bytes, checksum: 16a0cc9fd1c8473e2ae9118f6b41a5ec (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Márcia Araújo(marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-03-28T17:28:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_dis_jclmarques.pdf: 506864 bytes, checksum: 16a0cc9fd1c8473e2ae9118f6b41a5ec (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-28T17:28:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2016_dis_jclmarques.pdf: 506864 bytes, checksum: 16a0cc9fd1c8473e2ae9118f6b41a5ec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 / This study aims to analyze the tension between faith and reason in the thought of Søren Kierkegaard, whose interpretive core the concept of paradox. The study discusses the most fundamental questions of this problem. At first, which is to introduce the paradox of faith, it will be considered the criticism by Kierkegaard to the Hegelian synthesis between faith and reason. Referring to the first section of the Concluding Unscientific Postscript, you will notice, in this point, the refusal of Kierkegaard to a faith founded historically and rationally as well as the rejection of a system that, in the context of existence intend the full truth. Thus the philosopher of Copenhagen outlines quite clearly the limits of rational knowledge. In the second route, the research will focus on the analysis of the nature of faith, based, above all, the flagship category of the knight of faith presented by Kierkegaard in Fear and Trembling. The analysis of the notion of faith become essential to discuss more directly related concepts, namely, the notion of Leap, the relationship between faith and the va rious existential categories - Resignation, Suffering, Anguish and Loneliness – as well as the notion of absolute paradox and the relationship between faith and scandal. Finally, stressing once again the gap between the author of Edifying speeches and Hegelian thought, it will be discussed-the permanence of the paradox. In Kierkegaard, as we shall see, the paradox is not seized by and revealed by reason. It persists and is expressed in various existential categories. See It will, therefore, that the faith Knight is always in tension, is between anguish and the building, whether between risk and conviction, or even between the teleological suspension of ethics and duty to love the neighbor. In relation to the infinite, the Paradox is the companion that packs the Knight in his finite existence. / O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar a tensão entre fé e razão no pensamento de Søren Kierkegaard, tendo como núcleo interpretativo o conceito de Paradoxo. O estudo discute as questões mais fundamentais dessa problemática. Em um primeiro momento, o qual consiste na instauração do Paradoxo da fé, será considerada a crítica feita por Kierkegaard à síntese hegeliana entre fé e razão. Tendo como referência a primeira seção do Pós-Escrito conclusivo e não-científico, notar-se-á, neste ponto, a recusa kierkegaardiana a uma fé fundada histórica e racionalmente, bem como a rejeição de um sistema que, no âmbito da existência, tenha a pretensão da plena verdade. Com isso, o filósofo de Copenhague traceja com bastante nitidez os limites do conhecimento racional. Em um segundo percurso, a pesquisa concentrar-se-á na análise da natureza da fé, partindo, sobretudo, da emblemática categoria do Cavaleiro da fé apresentada por Kierkegaard em Temor e tremor. A análise da noção de fé tornará imprescindível a discussão de conceitos mais diretamente relacionados, a saber: a noção de Salto, a relação entre a fé e as várias categorias existenciais – Resignação, Sofrimento, Angústia e Solidão –, bem como a noção de Paradoxo absoluto e a relação entre fé e Escândalo. Por fim, acentuando mais uma vez o distanciamento entre o autor dos Discursos edificantes e o pensamento hegeliano, discutir-se-á a permanência do paradoxo. Em Kierkegaard, como veremos, o Paradoxo não é apreendido e descortinado pela razão. Ele persiste e se expressa nas mais variadas categorias existenciais. Ver-se-á, portanto, que o Cavaleiro da fé encontra-se sempre em tensão, seja entre a angústia e a edificação, seja entre o risco e a convicção, ou mesmo entre a Suspensão teleológica da ética e o dever de amar o próximo. Na relação com o infinito, o Paradoxo é o companheiro que embala o Cavaleiro em sua existência finita.

L’Ancien Testament ne contient pas de terme équivalent à celui de foi. Sa conception de la foi est la réaction de l’homme devant Dieu. L’exégèse actuelle se demande si l’origine de foi chez Paul revêt une signification hébraïque ou grecque, ou si foi n’est pas un vocable chrétien. Cette thèse étudie ce chapitre central pour la conception de la foi. Paul écrit Romains pour résoudre la désunion entre croyants Juifs et croyants non juifs à Rome. Le premier chapitre valorise la compréhension de la foi paulinienne dans le débat actuel. Le deuxième chapitre examine la conception de la foi dans Rm 1-3 où la justice de Dieu ne peut être obtenue par la Loi mais seulement par la foi dans l’Evangile. La conséquence radicale du monothéisme juif, Dieu est un, est que Dieu est le Dieu de tous ; ce qui permet de résoudre le conflit entre Juifs et non juifs croyants en réinterprétant l’identité chrétienne. Le troisième chapitre est l’étude exégétique de ce chapitre exclusivement théologique. Qu’a trouvé Abraham selon la chair ? Il a trouvé la justice avant d’être circoncis, justice associée à une promesse de descendance. En conclusion : la conception paulinienne de la foi et celle de l’Ancien Testament sont équivalentes : seul le Dieu unique justifie mais la conception paulinienne fait référence au Christ ; Paul revisite le récit sur Abraham à la lumière de sa foi au seul Dieu, et non plus par sa justification par les oeuvres. Paul, à la lumière de l’événement Christ, considère Abraham comme l’ancêtre de tous les croyants. Il donne une identité à la communauté naissante et l’appelle à l’union (Rm 15, 5) dans la foi ; le Dieu unique est maintenant identifié par son action en Jésus Christ. / There is no equivalent word that covers the meaning of faith in the Old Testament. It is the reaction of man to the action of God. Current exegesis has analyzed the background of faith in Paul to see if it has a Hebraic or Greek meaning or is a new word of Christianity. The dissertation studies this decisive chapter. Paul wrote Romans to end the conflict between two rival communities in Rome: Jewish believers and non-Jewish believers. The first chapter studies the Pauline interpretation of faith in the current debate. The second chapter deals with the faith concept in Rom 1-3. Paul states that God’s justice cannot be obtained by the Law but only by faith in God’s salvific power in Christ. According to Jewish monotheism, the radical consequence is that God is the God of Jews and non-Jews. To say that God is one enables Paul to solve the conflict between Jews and non-Jews by a new interpretation of Christian identity. The third chapter is the exegetical study of the most theological chapter. What has Abraham found according to the flesh? He has found justice before circumcision, a justice linked to the promise of an offspring. To conclude: the Pauline conception of faith and the Old Testament conception are similar: God alone justifies but for Paul, faith refers to Christ. Paul revisits the story of Abraham in the light of his faith in the one God and no longer through his justification by the works of Mosaic Law. Thus Abraham is considered as the ancestor of all believers, Jewish and non-Jewish. The new community is granted an identity and is called to agree with one another (Rom 15, 5) in faith. The one God is now identified by his action in Jesus Christ.