Global ETD Search

1	The law of hostile military expeditions as applied by the United States Curtis, Roy Emerson. January 1914 (has links) Presented as Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1912. / Cover title. "Reprinted from the American journal of international law, January and April, 1914." Includes bibliographical references (p. 253-255). Filibusters. Neutrality.
2	Trains, Steamers, and Slavers: The Antebellum Southern Commercial Conventions and American Empire Hoefel, Brian Adam 08 May 2012 (has links) No description available. American History History Manifest Destiny slavery South southern empire imperialism filibusters internal improvements slave trade Gadsden purchase Pacific railroad
3	The Texas Press and the Filibusters of the 1850s: Lopez, Carvajal, and Walker Zemler, Jeffrey A. (Jeffrey Allen) 05 1900 (has links) The decade of the 1850s saw the Texas press separate into two opposing groups on the issue of filibustering. The basis for this division was the personal beliefs of the editors regarding the role filibustering should have in society. Although a lust for wealth drove most filibusters, the press justified territorial expansion along altruistic lines. By 1858, however, a few newspapers discarded this argument and condemned filibusters as lawless bands of ruffians plundering peaceful neighbors. Throughout the decade, the papers gradually drifted from a consensus in 1850 to discord by the date of William Walker's third attempt on Nicaragua in 1858. filibustering Narcisco López José María Jesús Carvajal William Walker López, Narcisco, 1797-1851. Walker, William, 1824-1860. Filibusters -- Public Opinion -- Texas.
4	¿Necesidad o virtud? Razones y alcances de los tratados continentales hispanoamericanos de 1856 / ¿Necesidad o virtud? Razones y alcances de los tratados continentales hispanoamericanos de 1856 Reza, Germán A. De la 12 April 2018 (has links) This article examines the origins and motivations of the Continental Treaties of 1856, and their differences from the confederative treaties concluded in Panama in 1826 and Lima in 1848. It also seeks to explain the transition from the Bolivarian cooperative approach to a vision based in the balance of powers. As a result of this process, unionism appears as a temporary move, skeptical about its own achievements. / El presente artículo estudia los orígenes y las motivaciones de los tratado scontinentales de 1856 y sus diferencias respecto de los tratados confederativos concluidos en Panamá en 1826 y en Lima en 1848. En particular, se analiza el tránsito del enfoque cooperativo antimonárquico al defensivo excluyente de Estados Unidos; de la visión unionista bolivariana a la concepción del balance de poderes. Como resultado de ese proceso, el unionismo se constituye en una maniobra influida por la coyuntura y el escepticismo sobre sus propios alcances. Congress Of Panama Continental Treaty Of Santiago Filibusters Balance Of Powers Relaciones Sudamericanas En El Siglo Xix Congreso De Panamá Tratado Continental De Santiago Filibusteros Balance De Poderes

1

Page generated in 0.0394 seconds