Thesis--University of Madras. / Bibliography: p. 191-192.

Thesis (doctoral)--Uppsala universitet, 1993. / Errata slip inserted. Summary in English. Includes bibliographical references (p. 225-244).

Originally written as a Ph. D. thesis, Zürich, 1984. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [186]-194).

Rede--Utrecht. / Microform master no.: FSN 16,408. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (doctoral)--Rijksuniversiteit te Groningen. / Description based on print version record.

Thèse -- Université de Paris. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis--Münster. / Vita. Bibliography: p. 293-296.

The paper strives to highlight the common points between philosophy, theology and aesthetics, it is trying to demonstrate where and how these disciplines overlap, based on the view of Anglo-American authors. It consists of four main thematic sections. The first section is called The Relationship Between Philosophy, Theology and Aesthetics, the second one is The Debate in Anglo-American Aesthetics, the third section is titled The Debate in Anglo-American Philosophy, Religion and Art, and the fourth section is called The Debate in Anglo-American Theology. The author puts the greatest emphasis on the artistic, aesthetic area, as it is closest to us. Art is for the author the foundation and inspiration, the key to the link between the earthly and the divine nature, the cultural and religious areas, as Paul Tillich says.

Thesis (doctoral)--Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam. / Bibliography: p. 180-184.

Naturalizing the Unity of Consciousness: can neuroscience explain a fundamental feature of subjectivity? Martin Vraný Abstract The aim of the dissertation is to analyze the concept of the unity of conscious- ness as an explanandum for natural sciences and assess how good an explanation do leading neuroscientific theories of consciousness provide. The motivation be- hind this project is the idea that it is the unity which poses the greatest challenge for the scientific quest for consciousness. I argue in the Introduction that the reason why some theories of consciousness lead to what Dennett calls Cartesian materialism is precisely because they fail to address the problem of the unity of consciousness. If we had a good understanding of the unity of consciousness and its place in nature, we could more easily avoid the tendency to devise accounts of consciousness that are homuncular in disguise. In chapter 2 I analyze various aspects in which consciousness is thought be unified and conclude that two such aspects are particularly challenging for natu- ralizing the unity and that they cannot be treated separately. They are the unity of conscious contents at a time and the unity in the sense of a single subject having conscious contents and being able to reflect on them. Chapter 3 describes main conceptual and...