M.Tech. / Purpose: To determine what effects flexion distraction will have on males with chronic lumbar facet syndrome, in reference to intersegmental range of motion and pain. Method: Thirty male participants with chronic lumbar facet syndrome received flexion distraction technique. The trail consisted of seven visits over two to three weeks. Treatment was performed on the first to sixth visit, readings and questionnaires were completed on the first, fourth and seventh visits. Data collection was concluded before treatment on the mentioned visits. Subjective data consisted of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2). Objective data included global lumbar range of motion measurements using the Baseline Digital Inclinometer, and segmental lumbar range of motion by means of the Radiographical Midplane Angle method. Results: Objectively, clinical significance of the intersegmental lumbar range of motion increased from the L1/L2 to the L4/L5 level (2.2% - 17.7%), but showed no statistical significance. In relation to the maximal motion possible at these levels, the increase in motion escalated from 0.8% at the L1/L2 segment to 9.2% at the L4/L5 segment. The global lumbar range of motion showed clinical significant increase in all of the ranges except for extension, however statistical significance was found in right lateral flexion only (p = 0.045). The greatest increase in motion was observed in left lateral flexion (15.72%) and a decrease in extension (3.72%) was illustrated. Subjectively, the group showed statistical significant improvement in both the SF-MPQ-2 (p = 0.000) and ODI (p = 0.000). Clinical meaningful change was noted throughout the subjective data, which resultantly showed a 66% and a 67% change in pain respectively. Conclusion: Flexion distraction has shown to have clinical significant effects on segmental and thus global range of motion, and great clinical meaningful change in pain levels and pain perception. Thus specific segmental mobilisation does affect the segmental motion.

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2014. / Flexion distraction chiropractic technique (FDCT) is a commonly used manual therapy technique which is purported to address various clinical pain syndromes. However, it lacks the credibility of appropriate evidence-based guidelines. An analysis of the literature would be able to inform the development of guidelines. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the evidence to support the use of FDCT in clinical practice. Data sources: A systematic review of PubMed and Summons was conducted, using the following search terms: chiropractic, flexion distraction, protocol and / or technique. Study selection: All electronic or paper, English articles, which possessed the required key indexing terms and represented randomised and non-randomised controlled study designs were included. Data extraction: Blinded review of the articles was conducted by three independent reviewers utilising the PEDro (for randomised controlled trials) and NOS for (non-randomised controlled trials). This allowed the methodological rigour of the article to be ranked. This ranking was compared to a critical appraisal of the article in order to achieve an overall decision with regards to the contribution of the article to the level of evidence for FDCT. Data synthesis: 18 review outcomes were aggregated around four clinical categories; two articles each on neck pain, chronic pelvic pain, and physiological outcomes and the remaining twelve on low back pain. There was agreement that the evidence for pelvic pain and physiological function was limited to no evidence and limited respectively. Conflicting evidence existed for neck and low back pain (single and multimodal treatment) with limited and moderate evidence respectively. Conclusion: FDCT is clinically advocated for many conditions. The evidence provided in this review indicates that practitioners should be guarded in their use of FDCT, as the evidence to its widespread use is limited to only those conditions noted in this review. Therefore, further high quality and rigorous studies are required to develop appropriate treatment guidelines for use by practitioners to adequately provide evidence based care in clinical practice.

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2014. / Flexion distraction chiropractic technique (FDCT) is a commonly used manual therapy technique which is purported to address various clinical pain syndromes. However, it lacks the credibility of appropriate evidence-based guidelines. An analysis of the literature would be able to inform the development of guidelines. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the evidence to support the use of FDCT in clinical practice. Data sources: A systematic review of PubMed and Summons was conducted, using the following search terms: chiropractic, flexion distraction, protocol and / or technique. Study selection: All electronic or paper, English articles, which possessed the required key indexing terms and represented randomised and non-randomised controlled study designs were included. Data extraction: Blinded review of the articles was conducted by three independent reviewers utilising the PEDro (for randomised controlled trials) and NOS for (non-randomised controlled trials). This allowed the methodological rigour of the article to be ranked. This ranking was compared to a critical appraisal of the article in order to achieve an overall decision with regards to the contribution of the article to the level of evidence for FDCT. Data synthesis: 18 review outcomes were aggregated around four clinical categories; two articles each on neck pain, chronic pelvic pain, and physiological outcomes and the remaining twelve on low back pain. There was agreement that the evidence for pelvic pain and physiological function was limited to no evidence and limited respectively. Conflicting evidence existed for neck and low back pain (single and multimodal treatment) with limited and moderate evidence respectively. Conclusion: FDCT is clinically advocated for many conditions. The evidence provided in this review indicates that practitioners should be guarded in their use of FDCT, as the evidence to its widespread use is limited to only those conditions noted in this review. Therefore, further high quality and rigorous studies are required to develop appropriate treatment guidelines for use by practitioners to adequately provide evidence based care in clinical practice.