Note:

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

An empirical study of the effects of differential information and the expectations of investors is undertaken to test the differential information theory of Barry and Brown (1983). The theory is tested using the small firm effect. The excess returns found using ex post data are regressed against proxies for differential information and expectations. The residuals from these regressions are then tested to determine if the small firm effect is still observed. The results of this study are: 1. The tests provided empirical evidence that is consistent with the theory of Barry and Brown (1983) when a suitable proxy for differential information is used. 2. For the sample studied, the differential information effect on perceived risk by investors largely explained the small firm effect, when a suitable proxy was used. 3. Evidence was found that the small firm effect is composed of two parts supporting the findings of Keim (1983). One is a January effect, and the other during the remainder of the year, with the January effect still observed. 4. The proxy chosen to represent heterogeneous expectations must be selected with care. In this study the one selected did not prove suitable. Reasons are provided which indicate that the proxy chosen was the principal cause of the failure of these tests to support the theory. / Ph. D.

Bayesian approaches are increasingly being used to embed mechanistic process models used into statistical state space frameworks for environmental prediction and forecasting applications. In this study, I focus on Bayesian State Space Models (SSMs) for modeling the temporal dynamics of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems. In Chapter 1, I provide an introduction to Ecological Forecasting, State Space Models, and the challenges of using State Space Models for Ecosystems. In Chapter 2, we provide a brief background on State Space Models and common methods of parameter estimation. In Chapter 3, we simulate data from an example model (DALECev) using driver data from the Talladega National Ecosystem Observatory Network (NEON) site and perform a simulation study to investigate its performance under varying frequencies of observation data. We show that as observation frequency decreases, the effective sample size of our precision estimates becomes too small to reliably make inference. We introduce a method of tuning the time resolution of the latent process, so that we can still use high-frequency flux data, and show that this helps to increase sampling efficiency of the precision parameters. Finally, we show that data cloning is a suitable method for assessing the identifiability of parameters in ecosystem models. In Chapter 4, we introduce a method for embedding positive process models into lognormal SSMs. Our approach, based off of moment matching, allows practitioners to embed process models with arbitrary variance structures into lognormally distributed stochastic process and observation components of a state space model. We compare and contrast the interpretations of our lognormal models to two existing approaches, the Gompertz and Moran-Ricker SSMs. We use our method to create four state space models based off the Gompertz and Moran-Ricker process models, two with a density dependent variance structure for the process and observations and two with a constant variance structure for the process and observations. We design and conduct a simulation study to compare the forecast performance of our four models to their counterparts under model mis-specification. We find that when the observation precision is estimated, the Gompertz model and its density dependent moment matching counterpart have the best forecasting performance under model mis-specification when measured by the average Ignorance score (IGN) and Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS), even performing better than the true generating model across thirty different synthetic datasets. When observation precisions were fixed, all models except for the Gompertz displayed a significant improvement in forecasting performance for IGN, CRPS, or both. Our method was then tested on data from the NOAA Dengue Forecasting Challenge, where we found that our novel constant variance lognormal models had the best performance measured by CRPS, and also had the best performance for both CRPS and IGN for one and two week forecast horizons. This shows the importance of having a flexible method to embed sensible dynamics, as constant variance lognormal SSMs are not frequently used but perform better than the density dependent models here. In Chapter 5, we apply our lognormal moment matching method to embed the DALEC2 ecosystem model into the process component of a state space model using NEON data from University of Notre Dame Environmental Research Center (UNDE). Two different fitting methods are considered for our difficult problem: the updated Iterated Filtering algorithm (IF2) and the Particle Marginal Metropolis Hastings (PMMH) algorithm. We find that the IF2 algorithm is a more efficient algorithm than PMMH for our problem. Our IF2 global search finds candidate parameter values in thirty hours, while PMMH takes 82 hours and accepts only .12% of proposed samples. The parameter values obtained from our IF2 global search show good potential for out of sample prediction for Leaf Area Index and Net Ecosystem Exchange, although both have room for improvement in future work. Overall, the work done here helps to inform the application of state space models to ecological forecasting applications where data are not available for all stocks and transfers at the operational timestep for the ecosystem model, where large numbers of process parameters and long time series provide computational challenges, and where process uncertainty estimation is desired. / Doctor of Philosophy / With ecosystem carbon uptake expected to play a large role in climate change projections, it is important that we make our forecasts as informed as possible and account for as many sources of variation as we can. In this dissertation, we examine a statistical modeling framework called the State Space Model (SSM), and apply it to models of terrestrial ecosystem carbon. The SSM helps to capture numerous sources of variability that can contribute to the overall predictability of a physical process. We discuss challenges of using this framework for ecosystem models, and provide solutions to a number of problems that may arise when using SSMs. We develop methodology for ensuring that these models mimic the well defined upper and lower bounds of the physical processes that we are interested in. We use both real and synthetic data to test that our methods perform as desired, and provide key insights about their performance.