Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-03-20T15:48:39Z No. of bitstreams: 1 KatiaCileneFerreiraFranca_TESE.pdf: 868631 bytes, checksum: dc87a9baf5abb0ecec9a734f2691f701 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-03-21T13:54:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 KatiaCileneFerreiraFranca_TESE.pdf: 868631 bytes, checksum: dc87a9baf5abb0ecec9a734f2691f701 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-21T13:54:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 KatiaCileneFerreiraFranca_TESE.pdf: 868631 bytes, checksum: dc87a9baf5abb0ecec9a734f2691f701 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-02 / Esta pesquisa tem como objeto de estudo a rela??o dial?gica entre o sujeito e o discurso outro que constr?i a filia??o te?rica na escrita do pesquisador em forma??o, especificamente em teses de doutorado. Partindo da perspectiva de que o dialogismo ? o fundamento da linguagem (BAKHTIN/VOLOCHINOV, 2006), de que todo enunciado se faz em meio a j?-ditos e como tal carrega uma genealogia (BAKHTIN,2003), observ?vel na materialidade da l?ngua, elaboramos nossas quest?es de pesquisa: Como o dialogismo engendra a filia??o te?rica na escrita acad?mica? O que as formas lingu?sticas mostram sobre a genealogia que estabelece essa escrita? Nossa hip?tese ? de que a filia??o te?rica ? um processo produtor de sentidos, poss?vel de ser observado e compreendido a partir de uma s?rie de opera??es lingu?sticodiscursivas realizadas pelo sujeito, que elabora sua escrita em di?logo com diferentes vozes. Definimos como objetivo geral compreender como o dialogismo engendra a filia??o a partir do levantamento e da an?lise de opera??es lingu?stico-discursivas observ?veis na materialidade de teses de doutorado. A constru??o da d?vida, da hip?tese, do objetivo e a busca de respostas baseia-se ainda nos estudos enunciativos de Benveniste (2005,2006) e Authier-Revuz (1998, 2004) sobre a rela??o entre o sujeito e o discurso outro, impressa nas formas da l?ngua, e nos estudos antropol?gicos de L?vi-Strauss (1982) sobre o peso da cultura para a forma??o de fam?lias e para funcionamento de sistemas de parentesco no qual os membros assumem lugares e fun??es distintas. Esse di?logo interdisciplinar fez emergir perguntas espec?ficas sobre: Que tipo de vozes o sujeito convoca para mostrar-se como filiado? Como dialoga com elas? Que lugar e fun??o s?o atribu?dos ?s vozes convocadas? Tomamos como corpus um conjunto de teses de doutorado, coletadas na biblioteca virtual Dom?nio P?blico. Tratamos, metodologicamente, essas opera??es lingu?stico-discursivas como ind?cios (GINZBURG, 1989) que deixam ver e categorizar as vozes que constituem a filia??o te?rica. Os resultados obtidos confirmam a hip?tese levantada e mostram que, pela materialidade da escrita, ? poss?vel observar distintos arranjos familiares, definidos a partir do di?logo que o pesquisador estabelece com a voz do outro em diferentes n?veis de alteridade. / This research has as object of study the dialogical relationship between the subject and the other discourse that builds a theoretical affiliation in the writing of the researcher in formation, specifically in doctoral thesis. From the perspective that dialogism is the language foundation (BAKHTIN / VOLOCHINOV, 2006), that every statement is made in the midst of the alreadysaid and as such carries a genealogy (BAKHTIN, 2003), observable in the materiality of language, we elaborate our research questions: How does dialogism engender the theoretical affiliation in academic writing? What do linguistic forms show about a genealogy that establishes this writing? Our hypothesis is that theoretical affiliation is a process that produces meanings, which can be observed and understood from a series of linguistic-discursive operations carried out by the subject, who elaborates his writing in dialogue with different voices. We define as general objective to understand how the dialogism engenders the affiliation from the survey and the analysis of linguistic-discursive operations observable in the materiality of doctoral theses. The construction of doubt, hypothesis, objective and the search for answers is still based on the enunciative studies of Benveniste (2005, 2006) and Authier- Revuz (1998, 2004) on a relation between the subject and the other discourse printed in the language forms and in the anthropological studies of L?vi-Strauss (1982) on the weight of culture for the formation of families and for the functioning of kinship systems, in which members assume different places and functions. This interdisciplinary dialogue has raised specific questions about: What kind of voices does the subject call to show himself as an affiliate? How does he dialogue with them? What place and function are assigned to the called voices? We took as corpus a set of doctoral theses, collected in the virtual library Dom?nio P?blico. We deal, methodologically, with these linguistic-discursive operations as indications (GINZBURG, 1989) that let us see and categorize the voices that constitute the theoretical affiliation. The results confirm the hypothesis raised, show that through the materiality of writing it is possible to observe different familiar arrangements, defined from the dialogue that the researcher establishes with the voice of the other in different levels of otherness.