Spelling suggestions: "subject:"gambling axation"" "subject:"gambling ataxation""
1 |
Nayōbāi khō̜ng ratthabān kīeokap phāsī ʻākō̜n kānphanan, Phō̜. Sō̜. 2367-2460Kānčhanā Čhintakānon. January 1987 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Sinlapakorn University, 1987. / In Thai; abstract also in English. Added t.p.: Government's policy towards gambling taxes, 1824-1917. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 218-254). Also issued in print.
|
2 |
Nayōbāi khō̜ng ratthabān kīeokap phāsī ʻākō̜n kānphanan, Phō̜. Sō̜. 2367-2460Kānčhanā Čhintakānon. January 1987 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Sinlapakorn University, 1987. / In Thai; abstract also in English. Added t.p.: Government's policy towards gambling taxes, 1824-1917. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 218-254).
|
3 |
The proposed new gambling tax in South AfricaRoberts, Justin Esrom January 2011 (has links)
In the 2011/2012 Budget Speech delivered by the Minister of Finance, Pravin Gordhan, it was announced that a 15% withholding tax on gambling winnings above R 25 000 was to be introduced with effect from 1 April 2012. This treatise was undertaken to critically analyse the different elements of the proposed new withholding tax. It was established that the fiscus already benefits significantly from the gambling industry and levies and taxes from the gambling industry dwarf the revenue SARS collect from other forms of taxes such as Donations tax and Estate Duty tax. The necessity, therefore, of taxing gambling winnings in the hands of the individual is debatable. A comparison with the three foreign countries used by the Minister as an example of countries who have successfully implemented a withholding tax on gambling winnings exposed operational or other characteristics which bear no significant relationship to the situation in which the industry operates in South Africa. Probably the most significant difference is the fact that in the three foreign countries, losses are deductible and only the net gains are taxed. Although it iv could add to an already seemingly administrative-intensive legislation, it is submitted that taxing gambling winnings and ignoring losses suffered by gamblers will be disproportionately unfair towards the taxpayer. The many questions raised in this treatise illustrate the level of uncertainty still surrounding the new proposed gambling tax. It is hoped that communication will be provided by SARS as soon as possible to address the issues at hand. This would go a long way in ensuring that the implementation of the proposed withholding tax on gambling winnings is as smooth and efficient as possible.
|
Page generated in 0.1111 seconds