Cell signaling pathways are frequently used in multiple tissue and stage-specific contexts during multicellular development. The integration of these signaling pathways by transcriptional enhancers controls the tissue specific gene expression necessary for proper development. Enhancers are segments of DNA that interpret developmental signals to produce patterns of gene expression. A set of operational rules defines how different enhancers targeted by the same signals interpret and act on these signals. Using the Drosophila model system, my thesis work focuses on determining the operational rules used by developmental enhancers that integrate the Notch signaling pathway with other pathways. During development, the Notch signaling pathway in used to pattern cell territories involved in cell fate determination, and plays a role in differentiation. I first used a computational approach to identify a set of candidate Notch-target enhancers. From this set I carefully studied one specific enhancer from the nab gene that integrates the Notch and Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling pathways in the developing wing. This nab enhancer is a part of a cluster of enhancers that work together to drive the global nab expression pattern during development. Each of these enhancers drives the expected expression patterns as well as atypical expression patterns, which are silenced by adjacent enhancers. These results suggest that Notch targeted enhancers are involved in both tissue specific gene activation and gene silencing.

Bacteria have the ability to sense different environmental signals. When an environmental stress is detected, bacteria rapidly adjust their gene expression profile to be able to survive and thrive. The transduction of such environmental signals often requires the coordinated involvement of several factors that constitute complex regulatory networks. Hence, depending on the combination of signals, a unique gene expression profile required to adapt to the specific stress conditions is generated. Proteins are the best-known regulatory factors. However, non-proteinaceous molecules are also important in signal-responsive control of bacterial gene expression. Alarmones are low molecular weight non-proteinaceous regulatory factors which can characteristically be rapidly turned-over to mediate instant changes in gene expression. One such alarmone is the modified nucleotide ppGpp, which directly binds to RNA polymerase to alter its activity. The levels of this alarmone are expected to rapidly increase in response to any environmental stress that result in slow proliferation. DksA, a putative ppGpp co-regulator that likewise directly targets RNA polymerase, has been suggested to be required for both the positive and negative regulation mediated by ppGpp in Escherichia coli. This thesis describes dissection of the role of ppGpp and DksA on transcriptional regulation, primarily using the fim genetic determinant that encodes for the type 1 fimbriae. Type 1 fimbriae are involved in adhesion to abiotic surface and initial adhesion/invasion of bladder cells, as well as in biofilm formation. We found that ppGpp regulates phase variation by increasing the sub-population of cells that express the fimbriae. The effect of ppGpp was ultimately traced to its role in transcription of the fimB gene that encodes a recombinase involved in the phase variation process (paper 1). In contrast, we unexpectedly found that lack of DksA causes an increase, rather than a decrease, in transcription from the fimB P2 promoter in vivo. However, in vitro transcription studies demonstrated that ppGpp and DksA, both independently and co-dependently, stimulate transcription from the fimB P2 promoter. These seemingly contradictory results from the in vivo and in vitro transcriptional studies were shown to be, at least in part, a consequence of the increased association of Gre-factors with RNA polymerase that can occur in the absence of DksA in vivo (paper 2). The results outlined above have implications for the role of ppGpp and/or DksA in global gene expression. Using gene expression profile (microarray analysis) during the transition from logarithmic to stationary phase of E. coli, we found that while most of the genes regulated by ppGpp and DksA are regulated in the same direction by the two factors, many were not. In addition to the fim genes, genes involved in flagella functioning, taxis responses, and a few genes encoding different transport systems are also differentially regulated in ppGpp- and DksA-deficient strains in vivo. Our results clearly indicate that the effect of deficiencies in ppGpp and DksA is far more complex than phenotypic similarity of the corresponding mutants anticipated by the proposed concerted action of ppGpp and DksA on gene expression (paper 2 & 3).