Spelling suggestions: "subject:"eneral aptitude test battery."" "subject:"feneral aptitude test battery.""
1 |
An investigation of the general aptitude test battery as a predictor of academic success for college studentsBrown, Georgia M. January 1999 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis, PlanB (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
2 |
The Isolation of GATB Aptitude Patterns for Six Major Fields of StudyCullum, Felder Wilson 08 1900 (has links)
The problem of this study was to isolate General Aptitude Test Battery patterns for persons who have succeeded in certain major fields of study at North Texas State University, Denton, Texas. In addition to the basic problem stated above, an effort was made to (1) determine the significance of the relationships between GATB scores and grade-point averages for all undergraduate courses taken; (2) determine the relationships between GATB scores and grade-point averages for all undergraduate courses in the major field of study, and (3) conduct a survey of all subjects selected for this study to determine their past, present and expected future fields of occupational endeavor since graduation from college and the relationship between such employment and the individual's major field of study in college.
|
3 |
Relationship between Aptitudes and Major Fields of StudyNicksick, Theodore 01 1900 (has links)
As new measures of aptitude are devised, their implications to education are a fertile source for research. All facets of aptitudes as they relate to education are explored. This study is concerned with such exploration in that it investigates the relationships between aptitudes, as measured by the General Aptitude Test Battery and selected major fields of study at North Texas State College, Denton, Texas. The major fields of study selected for this research are Accounting, Business Education, Elementary Education, Industrial Arts and Marketing.
|
4 |
The utility of the Revised Nonreading Aptitude Test Battery vs. the General Aptitude Test Battery /Barber, Robert M. January 1990 (has links)
Thesis (Ed. D.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1990. / Vita. Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 117-123). Also available via the Internet.
|
5 |
The utility of the Revised Nonreading Aptitude Test Battery vs. the General Aptitude Test BatteryBarber, Robert M. 16 September 2005 (has links)
The study focused on the aptitude test performances of intellectually sub-normal subjects on the Nonreading Aptitude Test Battery (R-NATB) vs. the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). There were two research questions investigated: (1) Are there performance differences on the RNATB vs. GATB of borderline and/or mildly retarded individuals?, and (2) Is the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised (WRAT-R) a better predictor than the Wide Range Scale (WRS) of R-NATB and/or GATB aptitude performances in borderline and/or mildly retarded individuals?
Two groups were selected for the study - 80 borderline and 80 mildly retarded subjects, ages 15-25 years. Each group contained 40 subjects with high reading skills and 40 with low reading skills as determined by the WRS. The order of aptitude test administration was also controlled. The research data collection began in November 1984 and was completed in October 1987.
The following were the major findings for borderline and mildly retarded subjects. ages 15-25: (1) individuals with higher reading skills performed significantly higher on the General Intelligence (G), Verbal (V), and Numerical (N) aptitudes on the GATB and R-NATB than those with lower reading skills; (2) generally, the GATB and R-NATB did not meet the established criteria for tests known to have acceptable levels of convergent and discriminant validity; (3) subjects performed higher on the General Intelligence (G), Verbal (V), and Numerical (N) aptitudes when taking the GATB in comparison to the R-NATB; (4) subjects performed higher on the Spatial (S), Form Perception (P), and Clerical Perception (Q) when taking the R-NATB in comparison to the GATB; and (5) neither the Wide Range Scale nor the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised proved to be effective predictors of higher GATB vs. R-NATB aptitude performances in intellectually subnormal individuals.
If the GATB or R-NATB must be taken, borderline and mildly retarded individuals would optimize their aptitude test performances if they would take the B-1001 form of the GATB so they could mark their answers in the test booklet instead of on an answer sheet. Furthermore, the WRS and WRAT-R are not adequate screeners for predicting optimal aptitude performances / Ed. D.
|
6 |
A Study to Determine the Relationship between the Scores Made on Aptitudes "V" and "N" of the General Aptitude Test Battery and Parts "Q" and "L" of the American Council on Education Psychological Examination and the Academic Grades of Students Enrolled in Beginning English and Industrial Arts 122, 131, 245, 311, and 331Bruns, Lawrence B. 01 1900 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the Q-scores and the L-scores made on the American Council on Education Psychological Examination and the scores made on Aptitudes "N" and "V" of the General Aptitude Test Battery by the same students, and to compare the academic grades of these same students with the aforementioned test scores in order to determine what relationship exists, if any, between academic grades made in certain selected courses and scores made on each of the aforementioned tests.
|
Page generated in 0.1204 seconds