Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-20T19:09:36Z No. of bitstreams: 1 SarahRuthFerreiraFernandes_DISSERT.pdf: 1088849 bytes, checksum: fa05e7446abb322633c04bcce60eca08 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-21T19:57:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 SarahRuthFerreiraFernandes_DISSERT.pdf: 1088849 bytes, checksum: fa05e7446abb322633c04bcce60eca08 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-21T19:57:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SarahRuthFerreiraFernandes_DISSERT.pdf: 1088849 bytes, checksum: fa05e7446abb322633c04bcce60eca08 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-29 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / Desde a regulamenta??o como profiss?o no Brasil, a forma??o em Psicologia se constr?i em torno da ideia de um curso generalista. A mudan?a de Curr?culo M?nimo para Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DCN) abrangeu v?rios debates, a forma??o generalista permaneceu como um consenso, mas com novos sentidos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar as concep??es e estrat?gias atuais de forma??o generalista nos cursos de Psicologia da cidade de Natal-RN. Foram analisados os Projetos Pedag?gicos de Curso (PPC), matrizes curriculares e entrevistas com os coordenadores dos cursos e docentes que participaram da cria??o do curr?culo. A pesquisa contou com quatro cursos participantes, sendo que tr?s forneceram seus PPCs e os quatro participaram por meio de entrevistas. Os dados foram agrupados em categorias criadas a posteriori. Foi constatado um discurso uniforme em torno da defesa de uma forma??o generalista. Os curr?culos s?o conteudistas, mostram uma predomin?ncia da ?rea cl?nica e pouca ?nfase no estudo de fundamentos filos?ficos e hist?ricos, relacionam forma??o generalista a um curr?culo diversificado nas teorias e campos de atua??o profissional, buscando uma integra??o de disciplinas por meio de atividades e experi?ncias pr?ticas. Relacionam pesquisa e integra??o curricular, mas os incentivos na maioria dos cursos s?o parcos. O discurso de compet?ncias est? presente, ainda que se tenha pouca clareza sobre sua concretiza??o. Os cursos comparam ?nfases curriculares ? ?reas da Psicologia, o que torna o termo controverso, revelando uma compreens?o dicot?mica entre forma??o generalista e especialista. Assim, a predomin?ncia de um conteudismo voltado para a pr?tica profissional tem separado teoria e pr?tica e obscurecido uma concep??o cr?tica de forma??o como forma??o humana, filos?fica, hist?rica e cient?fica. / Since its regulation as a profession in Brazil, training in Psychology has been built over the idea of a generalist course. The change from Minimum Curriculum to National Curricular Guidelines (NCG) included a series of discussions and generalist training remained a consensus, but with new meanings. The objective of this study was to investigate the concepts and current strategies on generalist training in psychology courses in the city of Natal-RN. Therefore, we analyzed the Pedagogical Projects of the Courses (PPCs) and conducted interviews with coordinators and professors who participated in the creation of the curriculum. The research included four participating courses, of which three provided their PPCs and the four courses participated in interviews. Data was grouped into categories created a posteriori. We noticed a uniform discourse around the defense of a generalist training. The curricula are conteudists, show predominance of the clinical area and have little emphasis on the study of philosophical and historical foundations, generalist training is related to a diverse curriculum in theories and professional fields, seeking for integration of disciplines through activities and varied practical experience. The courses connect research and curriculum integration, but the incentives in most courses are meager. The competencies discourse is present, although it has not clarity about how to implement it. The courses compare curricular emphases with areas of psychology, which makes the term controversial, revealing a dichotomous understanding between generalist and specialist training. Thus, the predominance of a conteudism related to a professional training have generated a separation between theory and practice and obscures the critical conception of generalist training as a human, philosophical, historical and scientific formation.