For many years research in artificial intelligence followed a symbolic paradigm which required a level of knowledge described in terms of rules. More recently subsymbolic approaches have been adopted as a suitable means for studying many problems. There are many search mechanisms which can be used to manipulate subsymbolic components, and in recent years general search methods based on models of natural evolution have become increasingly popular. This thesis examines a hybrid symbolic/subsymbolic approach and the application of evolutionary algorithms to a problem from each of the fields of shape representation (finding an iterated function system for an arbitrary shape), natural language dialogue (tuning parameters so that a particular behaviour can be achieved) and speech recognition (selecting the penalties used by a dynamic programming algorithm in creating a word lattice). These problems were selected on the basis that each should have a fundamentally different interactions at the subsymbolic level. Results demonstrate that for the experiments conducted the evolutionary algorithms performed well in most cases. However, the type of subsymbolic interaction that may occur influences the relative performance of evolutionary algorithms which emphasise either top-down (evolutionary programming - EP) or bottom-up (genetic algorithm - GA) means of solution discovery. For the shape representation problem EP is seen to perform significantly better than a GA, and reasons for this disparity are discussed. Furthermore, EP appears to offer a powerful means of finding solutions to this problem, and so the background and details of the problem are discussed at length. Some novel constraints on the problem's search space are also presented which could be used in related work. For the dialogue and speech recognition problems a GA and EP produce good results with EP performing slightly better. Results achieved with EP have been used to improve the performance of a speech recognition system.