The aim of this thesis was to investigate different aspects of male breast cancer (MBC), and to compare these with findings in female breast cancer (FBC). In paper I, a population–based study was performed to investigate possible differences in treatment and outcome between MBC and FBC patients. MBC and FBC presented with a similar distribution of stage. Although no differences in primary treatment strategy were demonstrated, MBC patients had significantly poorer overall and relative survival, indicating a more aggressive disease. Paper II aimed to assess the value of clinicopathological factors and molecular subtypes in MBC. One hundred and ninety-seven MBC tumors were characterized using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the findings were correlated to outcome. Lymph node positivity, larger tumor size and ER-negativity were independent risk factors for breast cancer death. Tumor grade, HER2, Ki 67 or IHC classification into molecular subtypes did not demonstrate any prognostic information. In paper III, the same patient material as in paper II was used for evaluation of proliferation markers. High levels of cyclin A and cyclin B expression and an elevated mitotic count were predictive of breast cancer death. Ki-67 was re-evaluated using different cut-offs, but no prognostic value could be demonstrated. Contrarily, overexpression of cyclin D1 was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer death. In papers IV-V, the molecular background of MBC tumors was investigated.  Global GEX analyses were performed and two novel subgroups of MBC tumors were identified; luminal M1 and luminal M2. When comparing the degree of similarity with the “intrinsic” subtypes in FBC tumors, more than half of the MBC tumors remained unclassified.  Comparative genomic hybridization was used to investigate DNA aberrations. Two MBC subgroups were identified, of which one did not resemble any of the female subgroups. In both studies on the molecular level, a majority of patients were classified into the subgroup with a more aggressive tumor behavior. In conclusion, MBC seems to be a unique tumor entity. The established molecular subtypes in FBC are not applicable in MBC. Other prognostic profiles, specific for MBC, need to be identified.

Introduction. Alors qu’elle constitue le seul traitement curatif du cholangiocarcinome intrahépatique (CCIH), la résection reste associée à un taux de récidive supérieur à 60% et un taux de survie réelle à 5 ans inférieur à 20%. Une estimation fiable du pronostic ainsi qu’une meilleure compréhension de la biologie tumorale est essentielle pour améliorer le pronostic.Méthodes. A l’appui des données clinico-biologiques de deux larges cohortes de patients avec CCIH réséqué (MSKCC, n=189 et AFC, n=522), trois objectifs ont été explorés. Tout d’abord, définir quel modèle pronostique publié est le plus performant. Ensuite, définir la fiabilité de l’évaluation pronostique préopératoire à partir de, respectivement, l’imagerie, des microARN (miR) circulants diagnostiques et du profil génomique tumoral. Enfin, évaluer l’impact pronostique de la survenue d’événements périopératoires tels que transfusion et morbidité.Résultats. Premièrement, les nomogrammes apportaient une meilleure estimation pronostique en comparaison à la classification AJCC 7ème édition. Deuxièmement, la taille et la multifocalité tumorale sur l’imagerie préopératoire permettaient de différencier deux groupes de patients de pronostic clairement distincts (p<0,001). L’existence d’une mutation d’un gène de remodelage de la chromatine (BAP1, ARID1A, PBRM1) tendait à être associé à une survie sans récidive plus favorable qu’en l’absence de mutation (p=0,09). Alors qu’ayant un potentiel comme marqueur diagnostique circulant, miR21 et miR221 n’étaient pas associé à la survie. Troisièmement, la transfusion peropératoire n’impactait pas la survie à long terme alors que la survenue d’une complication sévère (grade Dindo-Clavien > 2) était indépendamment associée à une survie globale plus courte (p=0,002).Conclusion. Alors que les nomogrammes postopératoires apportent une meilleure estimation pronostique, le développement de modèles pronostiques préopératoires est faisable notamment à partir de l’imagerie et de marqueurs biologiques tumoraux complémentaires. / Introduction. Complete resection stands as the only curative option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC). Still, prognosis remains poor after resection due to a recurrence rate over 60% leading to actual 5-year survival rates below 20%. Reliable prognostic estimation and better understanding of tumor biology would be of interest for improving IHCC prognosis.Methods. Using clinical and biological data from two large cohort of resected IHCC (MSKCC, n=189 and AFC, n=522), three objectives have been explored. First, assessing the performances of different published prognostic models. Second, defining the reliability of preoperative prognostic estimation using imaging, tumoral genomic profiling and circulating tumoral microRNA (miR). Third, evaluating the prognostic impact of perioperative events such as blood transfusion and morbidity.Results. First, nomograms displayed better prognostic accuracy over the AJCC 7th edition staging system. Second, tumor size and multifocality on preoperative imaging allowed patient stratification in groups statistically different regarding prognosis (p<0.001). Further, the presence of chromatine remodeling gene mutations (BAP1, ARID1A, PBRM1) tended towards longer recurrence-free survical (p=0,09). Some diagnostic circulating miR such as miR21 and miR221 were not associated with survival. Third, in contrast with intraoperative transfusion, the occurrence of severe morbidity (Dindo-Clavien grade > 2) was independently associated with shorter overall survival (p=0.002).Conclusion. Nomograms outperform conventional staging sytem. Preoperative prognostic estimation is feasible and reliable using imaging. Identifying new prognostic biomarkers would help refining preoperative prognostic estimation.