In this study, options for restoring fish populations in Hamilton City (37.47'S, 175.19'E) were explored. Habitat and fish populations in Hamilton urban streams were manipulated using a two-fold experimental design. Firstly, habitat was enhanced in ten urban streams with three continuous treatments in a 60-m reach at each site (20 m with 10 ponga logs, 20 m with 20 hollow clay pipes, and 20 m with no added structure). Secondly, juvenile farm-reared giant kokopu (Galaxias argenteus), were stocked into five of the enhanced stream sections. Giant kokopu are threatened and occur naturally in Hamilton urban streams in sparse populations. The abundance of wild fish was monitored before and after enhancement and fish release from November 2006 to November 2007. Stocked fish were monitored for eight months, from April to November 2007. Over this time electric fishing was conducted three times, trap nets (Gee minnow and fyke nets) were set monthly and spotlighting was conducted monthly at three release sites where water clarity allowed. Anticipated outcomes of this research were; to determine whether giant kokopu abundance in Hamilton urban streams is limited by recruitment or by habitat, and to assist with the development of methods to restore fish populations in Hamilton City urban streams. Logs used as enhancement structures in Hamilton urban streams provided more stable habitat for fish and created more suitable microhabitat than pipe structures. Pipes moved considerably during high flows, and their instability made them less effective at providing habitat. Within the study sites there appeared to be complex interactions with turbidity, stream width and depth, which complicated the effect of the habitat structures. The limited replication and variability among sites contributed to statistically insignificant results using analysis of variance. Retention and recapture rates of stocked juvenile giant kokopu were greatest at Site M11, where the stream was narrow, shallow, clear and had lower numbers and biomass of shortfin eels, compared to other survey sites. Marked and released giant kokopu were retained in the release reaches at four of the five sites, for a minimum of four months, and exhibited substantial growth. Daily growth of juvenile giant kokopu ranged from 0.19 to 0.33 mm day-1 and from 0.03 to 0.11 g day-1, exhibiting substantial growth over winter. Giant kokopu appeared to have a slight bias to the log section of enhanced habitat, but habitat selection appeared to be overwhelmingly controlled by initial habitat selection. The stocking of farm-reared fish into urban streams was largely successful, but the success of the habitat enhancement was variable and further work is required to determine better techniques for habitat enhancement in these urban environments. It is concluded that releasing farm-reared giant kokopu can be used to restore populations especially where recruitment limitations control fish abundance and diversity.

Individuals within a species often compete for resources in both space and time. In dominance hierarchies individuals with the greatest competitive ability will occupy prime locations during optimal periods to increase efficiency in gathering a resource. Subdominant individuals with low competitive abilities may be forced to reside in habitats of poor quality relative to dominant individuals. In this study I examined the long term patterns of giant kokopu distribution, movement, growth, habitat use, and social interaction between fish in relation to invertebrate drift (food supply). The habitat quality and abundance of food along a one km section of Alex�s Creek was monitored for a two year period. Though the physical structure of Alex�s Creek was relatively homogenous there were significant spatial differences in the density of drifting invertebrates sampled between riffles and pools over this long temporal period. In general, more drifting invertebrates were sampled in riffles of relatively long length and area. Within Alex�s Creek the distribution of giant kokopu, Galaxias argenteus, was determined by patchy distributions of food supply, specific physical factors of pools, and interactions between fish in dominance hierarchies. Over the 20 month study period, the most important biotic factor determining fish biomass was the total number of drifting invertebrates within pools while the most important abiotic factor determining fish abundances within pools was the pool size (surface area). The growth rate of individual fish correspondingly varied between fish residing within pools of different quality. Growth rates were higher for individual fish residing in pools with a relatively high density of drifting invertebrates. The differences in individual growth rates of giant kokopu may determine when fish leave a particular habitat patch (pool) and move to a new one. Fish that moved had lower growth rates (before moving) than fish that remained resident within home pools. Overall the movement of giant kokopu within Alex�s Creek was very restricted due to a relatively consistent distribution of food, however there were differences in the mobility of giant kokopu among different social ranks. The most dominant fish in pools were largely sedentary while fish ranked directly below fish 1 (i.e. fish 2 and 3 in social hierarchies) were relatively mobile. The ability of dominant fish to exclude subdominant fish from the most preferred feeding positions during optimal feeding times had consequences for overall giant kokopu activity. Under normal food supply conditions dominant fish were predominantly nocturnal and maintained large home ranges at night. Conversely subdominant fish occupied large home ranges by day, but were generally not observed at night. When the food supply was limited the utilization of pools was determined by social rank. Dominant fish from each pool increased daytime activity, home range size, aggressiveness, and the capture of food items offered by day while simultaneously reducing the spatial and temporal activity and habitat use of subdominant fish. These results indicate that behavioral changes in large dominant fish influence and reduce the amount of resources available to subdominant fish.

Individuals within a species often compete for resources in both space and time. In dominance hierarchies individuals with the greatest competitive ability will occupy prime locations during optimal periods to increase efficiency in gathering a resource. Subdominant individuals with low competitive abilities may be forced to reside in habitats of poor quality relative to dominant individuals. In this study I examined the long term patterns of giant kokopu distribution, movement, growth, habitat use, and social interaction between fish in relation to invertebrate drift (food supply). The habitat quality and abundance of food along a one km section of Alex�s Creek was monitored for a two year period. Though the physical structure of Alex�s Creek was relatively homogenous there were significant spatial differences in the density of drifting invertebrates sampled between riffles and pools over this long temporal period. In general, more drifting invertebrates were sampled in riffles of relatively long length and area. Within Alex�s Creek the distribution of giant kokopu, Galaxias argenteus, was determined by patchy distributions of food supply, specific physical factors of pools, and interactions between fish in dominance hierarchies. Over the 20 month study period, the most important biotic factor determining fish biomass was the total number of drifting invertebrates within pools while the most important abiotic factor determining fish abundances within pools was the pool size (surface area). The growth rate of individual fish correspondingly varied between fish residing within pools of different quality. Growth rates were higher for individual fish residing in pools with a relatively high density of drifting invertebrates. The differences in individual growth rates of giant kokopu may determine when fish leave a particular habitat patch (pool) and move to a new one. Fish that moved had lower growth rates (before moving) than fish that remained resident within home pools. Overall the movement of giant kokopu within Alex�s Creek was very restricted due to a relatively consistent distribution of food, however there were differences in the mobility of giant kokopu among different social ranks. The most dominant fish in pools were largely sedentary while fish ranked directly below fish 1 (i.e. fish 2 and 3 in social hierarchies) were relatively mobile. The ability of dominant fish to exclude subdominant fish from the most preferred feeding positions during optimal feeding times had consequences for overall giant kokopu activity. Under normal food supply conditions dominant fish were predominantly nocturnal and maintained large home ranges at night. Conversely subdominant fish occupied large home ranges by day, but were generally not observed at night. When the food supply was limited the utilization of pools was determined by social rank. Dominant fish from each pool increased daytime activity, home range size, aggressiveness, and the capture of food items offered by day while simultaneously reducing the spatial and temporal activity and habitat use of subdominant fish. These results indicate that behavioral changes in large dominant fish influence and reduce the amount of resources available to subdominant fish.