The major purposes of this study are twofold. The first purpose is to describe the setting and the context for the program and the methods by which a Government initiated change, a Participation and Equity Program,was introduced into a particular school. The second purpose is to consider the change process which occurred and to analyse the factors involved in the change and the procedures by which the change was managed. The study outlines ways in which change can become an issue on the political agenda and hence become a Government priority which is eventually handed down as policy to be followed by schools. Introduction of change in this manner is regarded as a top-down, or authoritarian, model of change. Such a model of change has the advantage of ensuring same change occurs within a specified time but at the same time there are disadvantages relating to a lack of skill, or expertise, amongst school staff and a possible lack of commitment to change. The study draws attention to problems encountered in the introductory procedures of the program which caused a sense of frustration amongst those attempting to manage the change at the school level. It is shown how the system failed to provide effective support at this level. It is suggested that there is a bureaucratic lack of understanding of the problems of implementing change in a school which is itself considered to be a loosely coupled organization with problems peculiar to itself. In summary the study suggests that progress was made, in this particular example, chiefly through efforts at the school level but the results could have been improved with effective system support. While there has been some success the change has not yet been institutionalized within the school.