Spelling suggestions: "subject:"grasses -- needs."" "subject:"grasses -- seeds.""
1 |
RELATIONSHIP OF SEED WEIGHT TO PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES INBLUE PANICGRASS, PANICUM ANTIDOTALE (RETZ.)Abernethy, Rollin H. (Rollin Howard), 1947- January 1974 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Factors influencing germination and establishment of Arizona cottontop, bush muhly, and plains lovegrass in southern Arizona.Livingston, Margaret. January 1992 (has links)
Germination and establishment was evaluated in Arizona cottontop (Digitaria californica (Benth.) Chase), bush muhly (Muhlenbergia porteri Scribn.) and plains lovegrass (Eragrostis intermedia Hitchc.) from southern Arizona. Germination was determined in different aged seed harvested from native and irrigated plots of various populations. Results indicated variability in germination characteristics of study species that appeared unrelated to afterripening or dormancy. Germination ranged from 62 to 96% for Arizona cottontop, 34 to 99% for plains lovegrass, and 75 to 99% for bush muhly. Bush muhly had highest average velocity of germination (58.0 ± 4.1), followed by plains lovegrass (35.9 ± 1.91), and Arizona cottontop (31.4 ± 1.13). Effects of 3 surface treatments (furrows, gravel, litter) and 2 cultivation treatments on establishment of study species and yellow bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng var. ischaemum) was investigated in the field. Bush muhly did not emerge and plains lovegrass had minimal emergence. Arizona cottontop had similar emergence in cultivated and uncultivated plots whereas yellow bluestem had greater emergence in cultivated plots. Litter promoted greater survival of Arizona cottontop. Lower survival in furrows may have resulted from fewer days with available soil moisture and interference from greater density of non-seeded species. Soil covers appear to positively influence survival rather than emergence. Effect of rainfall distribution on germination was investigated using 2 seed retrieval methods. Arizona cottontop and bush muhly germinated after at least 3 days of available soil moisture. Plains lovegrass seeds did not germinate in the field but retrieved seeds had 83% germination, possibly due to light exposure under laboratory conditions. Another study determined whether species have different density and cover under overstory species compared to open areas. Arizona cottontop had either greater, less, or no differences in density under canopied versus open areas. Cover of Arizona cottontop was greater or similar among canopied and open areas. Plains lovegrass had lower or similar density and cover under canopies than in open areas. Bush muhly had greater density and cover under canopies. Overall, studies suggested that species are easily germinated, but accept relatively narrow ranges of environmental conditions for establishment. Establishment may be enhanced by sowing species when rainfall is consistent, extending available moisture through use of soil covers, or mimicking microsites where a species occurs naturally.
|
3 |
Effects of seedbed modification, sowing depth and soil water on emergence of warm-season grassesWinkel, Von Kenneth. January 1990 (has links)
The ability of different seedbed preparation treatments to enhance seedling establishment of 'Vaughn' sideoats graina (Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.), 'A-130' blue panic (Panicum antidotale Retz.), 'A-68' Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees) and 'Cochise' Atherstone lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees X E. tricophera Coss and Dur.) was determined in field and greenhouse experiments. Field experiments compared seed burial and seedling emergence on undisturbed plots with that of plots lightly or heavily trampled by cattle, furrowed with a land imprinter or plowed. Seed burial was nearly always greatest in plots disturbed by these 3 latter treatments compared to undisturbed or light-trampled plots. Summer thunderstorms increased burial on treated and undisturbed plots. These seedbed treatments likewise increased seedling emergence of all species during a moderately-wet summer but not during a dry summer when emergence was limited. Sideoats graina emergence was low all 3 years. Seed burial and emergence of the small-seeded lovegrasses was high in a wet year even on undisturbed plots. Greenhouse experiments were designed to determine effects of seedbed microsites, sowing depth and soil water on emergence, survival and morphology of sideoats graina, blue panic and Cochise lovegrass. Emergence of all species was highest from seeds under gravel, followed by seeds under litter, seeds in cracks and finally seeds on the bare soil surface. Cochise lovegrass had high emergence under gravel for both continuously-wet and drying seedbeds. Cochise lovegrass had greater survival, followed by blue panic and then sideoats graina. All 3 species initiated permanent roots from nodes near the soil surface regardless of sowing depth. Seedlings from deeper-sown seeds had shallower primary roots and less survival than seedlings from shallow-sown seeds. Although seedbed treatments may increase the number of seeds buried and thereby increase seedling emergence when summer storms are frequent, treatments which bury seeds too deep may decrease seedling emergence. Seedbed treatments do not ensure successful emergence in a dry year.
|
4 |
Breaking seed dormancy in three western Oregon grassesTrask, M. Melinda 12 July 1996 (has links)
Graduation date: 1997
|
5 |
Grass Seed ProductionHamilton, Louis P., Wooton, W. M. 07 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Rattail fescue (Vulpia myuros) control in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) grown for seedReyes, Carlos C. 23 January 1991 (has links)
Italian ryegrass growth and production from
positionally selective applications and sublethal rates of a
nonselective herbicide were compared to growth and
production when treated with diuron applied preemergence as
a broadcast treatment and safened by activated carbon
applied over the crop row. In the positionally selective
treatments, herbicide spray was directed to leave an
untreated zone over the crop row at planting. Growth
analysis indicated no detectable differences when Italian
ryegrass safened by directed spray was compared to Italian
ryegrass safened by activated carbon. The major difference
between systems was greater weed control in the crop row for
carbon-safened treatments.
The non-safened application superimposed sublethal
diuron rates over Italian ryegrass and rattail fescue grown
in varying densities and proportiors. Growth analysis of
monoculture stands indicated differences due to planted
density, species, and herbicide, whereas growth analysis of
plants grown as space-planted individuals indicated
difference due to species only. Diuron at the rates applied
did not affect seed yield or above ground dry weight.
Soil samples were taken in crop rows where diuron was
applied as directed spray or broadcast spray safened by
carbon. Samples were assayed and soil profile
concentrations mapped. To assist future investigators'
understanding of the role rainfall plays in herbicide
movement from directed applications, elementary rainfall
depth and occurrence models were examined. The Markov and
mixed-exponential models adequately described rainfall
occurrence and depth patterns for Corvallis, Oregon. / Graduation date: 1992
|
7 |
Residue management and yield characteristics of fine fescue seed cropsSchumacher, Derek David 29 April 2005 (has links)
Chewings fescue [Festuca rubra L. subsp. fallax (Thuill.) Nyman] is a desired
turfgrass with dense sod forming capabilities and superior shade tolerance. Thermal
residue management (open-field burning) has traditionally been used to remove post-harvest
residue and maintain seed yield over the life of the stand. However, alternative
non-thermal residue management practices have been observed to produce adequate
seed yields dependent upon cultivar.
Strong creeping red fescue (F. rubra L. subsp. rubra) is desired for
its prolific tillering capacity and creeping rhizomatous growth habit. In contrast to
Chewings fescue, maintenance of seed yield in strong creeping red fescue has only
been profitably produced under thermal residue management. Slender creeping red
fescue [F. rubra L. var. littoralis (Vasey)] is a desired turfgrass with a compact, less
rhizomatous growth habit, similar to Chewings fescue in desirable turf attributes.
However, little is known about the effects of post-harvest residue management in
slender creeping red fescue.
The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate seed yield and yield
components among different cultivars to thermal (open-burning), and non-thermal
(flail low and flail high) post-harvest residue management; 2) to evaluate harvest
index and percent cleanout to thermal and non-thermal residue management in
different cultivars; and 3) and to provide an economic analysis of thermal and non-thermal
residue management in all cultivars based on partial budgeting.
Three post-harvest residue management treatments (burn, flail low and flail
high) were applied over the course of two years. Seed yield components measured
included: total dry weight, fertile tiller number, spikelets per panicle, florets per
spikelet, and panicle length. Final seed yield in each cultivar and residue management
treatment method was determined after seed harvest and conditioning. Seed yield
component analysis was conducted over three production seasons.
Chewings fescue, strong creeping red fescue, and slender creeping red fescue
cultivars responded differently to residue management as indicated by a residue
management by cultivar interaction. In 2003 and 2004, residue management by
cultivar interactions were evident in seed number, seed weight, fertile tiller number,
percent cleanout, harvest index, and seed yield. Residue management by cultivar
interactions occurred in spikelets per panicle in 2003, whereas in 2004 a residue
management by cultivar interaction occurred in panicle length and florets per spikelet.
In 2004, non-thermal flail low, and thermal residue management resulted in
significantly greater spikelets per panicle in all cultivars. Thermal residue management
resulted in the greatest number of spikelets per panicle.
Results indicate that thermal residue management best maintained seed yield in
most subspecies and cultivars across both years. However, in 2003, non-thermal flail
low residue management produced profitable seed yield in only Marker slender
creeping red fescue. In contrast, thermal residue management resulted in poor seed
yields in Marker slender creeping red fescue and enhanced yields in Seabreeze slender
creeping red fescue in 2003. However, following the second year of thermal treatment
in 2004, Marker and Seabreeze both had lower seed yields, thus exhibiting the only
negative impact of thermal management among the cultivars tested in this study.
Moreover, upon review of an economic analysis, Marker slender red fescue was the
only cultivar that produced a positive net return of $78 and $4 ha⁻¹ under non-thermal
residue management in 2003 and 2004, respectively. Furthermore, in 2003, thermal
residue management net return increases ranged from $104 ha⁻¹ to -$996 ha⁻¹ in
Barnica and Shademark, respectively. In 2004, thermal residue management net return
increases ranged from $115 ha⁻¹ and $1,332 ha⁻¹ in Seabreeze and Shademark,
respectively.
Poor seed yields were observed in all strong creeping red fescue cultivars
under non-thermal residue management across both years of the study. This may be
attributed to an observed reduction in fertile tiller number and seed yield. In addition,
percent seed cleanout was increased with non-thermal residue management. In 2004,
as stand age increased, thermal residue management resulted in greater seed yields in
all cultivars and species, except both cultivars of slender creeping red fescue. Thus,
this study provided substantial evidence that thermal residue management has the
potential to maintain or increase fine fescue seed yield as stands age as well as to
maintain stand profitability. / Graduation date: 2005
|
8 |
Trinexapac-ethyl and open-field burning in creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) seed production in the Willamette ValleyZapiola, Maria Luz 22 October 2004 (has links)
Open-field burning has been an effective, economical, and widespread
method of post-harvest residue management in creeping red fescue seed
production in the Willamette Valley since the late 1940s. However, the use of field
burning has been legislatively restricted due to air quality and safety issues. The
foliar-applied plant growth regulator trinexapac-ethyl (TE), commercialized in the
USA as Palisade, has been accepted by producers as a yield enhancing agent
and is considered here as an alternative to open-field burning over a four-year
period.
The effects of open-field burning versus mechanical removal (flailing) of
post-harvest residue, and spring versus fall applications of TE on seed yield, dry
matter partitioning, and seed yield components were evaluated in a split-plot
design. The response to the different treatment combinations differed across
years. The young stand responded with a seed yield increase to spring TE
applications, regardless of residue management treatment. However, as the stand
aged, field burning became critical for maintaining high yields and, in 2003 and
2004, only spring TE applications resulted in seed yield increases in burned plots.
The higher potential seed yield achieved in burned plots over flailed plots,
as a result of a higher number of panicles per unit area and spikelets per panicle,
was critical for maintaining high seed yields as the stand aged. Spring
applications of TE, further increased seed yield over the untreated check by
increasing the number of florets per spikelet, reducing fertile tiller height and
lodging and consequently, favoring pollination and fertilization of the florets. Late
spring TE applications also increased 1000-seed weight in 2003 and 2004.
Although spring applications of TE were a promising alternative to open-field
burning early during the life of the stand, as the stand aged they did not
increase seed yield on flailed plots. Fall TE applications did not have a consistent
effect on seed yield, dry matter partitioning or seed yield components, and were
found not to be a viable management practice. / Graduation date: 2005
|
9 |
Methods to assess factors that influence grass seed yieldLouhaichi, Mounir 06 August 2002 (has links)
A greater than 10-fold increase in Canada goose (Branta canadensis)
populations over the past several years has resulted in concerns over grazing
impacts on grass seed production in the mid-Willamette Valley, Oregon. This
study was designed to develop methods to quantify and statistically analyze goose-grazing
impacts on seed yields of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and
perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Yield-mapping-system equipped
combines, incorporating global positioning system (GPS) technology, were used to
measure and map yields. Image processing of ground-level photography to
estimate crop cover and other relevant observations were spatially located via GPS
to establish spatial-temporal goose grazing patterns. We sampled each field semi-monthly
from mid-winter through spring. Spatially located yield data, soils
information, exclosure locations, and grazing patterns were integrated via
geographical information system (GIS) technology. To avoid concerns about
autocorrelation, a bootstrapping procedure for subsampling spatially contiguous
seed yield data was used to organize the data for appropriate use of analysis of
variance. The procedure was used to evaluate grazing impacts on seed yield for
areas of fields with different soils and with differential timing and intensity of
goose grazing activity. We also used a standard paired-plot procedure, involving
exclosures and associated plots available for grazing. The combination of spatially
explicit photography and yield mapping, integrated with GIS, proved effective in
establishing cause-and-effect relationships between goose grazing and seed yield
differences. Exclosures were essential for providing nongrazed controls. Both
statistical approaches were effective in documenting goose-grazing impacts.
Paired-plots were restricted by small size and few numbers and did not capture
grazing impacts as effectively as comparison of larger areas to exclosures.
Bootstrapping to subsample larger areas of yield for comparison was an effective
method of avoiding autocorrelation of data while better representing impacts within
a field. Occasional yield increases, ranging from 1 to 5 percent, were recorded
following goose grazing. Goose grazing generally resulted in seed yield
reductions, ranging up to 20 percent. Later and more intensive grazing tended to
increase yield reductions. Newly seeded tall fescue tended to be the most sensitive
to grazing. Established perennial ryegrass tended to be more resilient. / Graduation date: 2003
|
Page generated in 0.0511 seconds