In this thesis, we propose a general computational framework for generating mesh models of single-component (e.g., grayscale) and multi-component (e.g., RGB color) images. This framework builds on ideas from the previously-proposed GPRFSED method for single-component images to produce a framework that can handle images with any arbitrary number of components. The key ideas embodied in our framework are Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion and greedy-point removal. Our framework has several free parameters and the effect of the choices of these parameters is studied. Based on experimentation, we recommend two specific sets of parameter choices, yielding two highly effective single/multi-component mesh-generation methods, known as MED and MGPRFS. These two methods make different trade offs between mesh quality and computational cost. The MGPRFS method is able to produce high quality meshes at a reasonable computational cost, while the MED method trades off some mesh quality for a reduction in computational cost relative to the MGPRFS method. To evaluate the performance of our proposed methods, we compared them to three highly-effective previously-proposed single-component mesh generators for both grayscale and color images. In particular, our evaluation considered the following previously-proposed methods: the error diffusion (ED) method of Yang et al., the greedy-point-removal from-subset (GPRFSED) method of Adams, and the greedy-point removal (GPR) method of Demaret and Iske. Since these methods cannot directly handle color images, color images were handled through conversion to grayscale as a preprocessing step, and then as a postprocessing step after mesh generation, the grayscale sample values in the generated mesh were replaced by their corresponding color values. These color-capable versions of ED, GPRFSED, and GPR are henceforth referred to as CED, CGPRFSED, and CGPR, respectively. Experimental results show that our MGPRFS method yields meshes of higher quality than the CGPRFSED and GPRFSED methods by up to 7.05 dB and 2.88 dB respectively, with nearly the same computational cost. Moreover, the MGPRFS method outperforms the CGPR and GPR methods in mesh quality by up to 7.08 dB and 0.42 dB respectively, with about 5 to 40 times less computational cost. Lastly, our MED method yields meshes of higher quality than the CED and ED methods by up to 7.08 and 4.72 dB respectively, where all three of these methods have a similar computational cost. / Graduate