Traditional vineyard floor management in the eastern USA consists of mown resident vegetation in the aisle and herbicide bare driplines, promoting soil erosion and crusting, compaction, lowered water penetration, herbicide resistance, difficult weed management, increased plant parasitic nematode populations and decreased soil biodiversity for pest management. To investigate these issues, four novel vineyard floor management techniques and two N-fertilizer applications were investigated using nematode assemblages as a bioindicator of soil health. Main-plot groundcover treatments include: 1.) grower control, consisting of mown fescue (Festuca arundinacea) in the aisle with herbicide bare vine dripline, 2.) red fescue, creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) established in both the aisle and vine dripline, 3.) successional, annually planted cereal rye (Secale cereale L.), spring oats (Avena sativa L.), and sorghum-sudan grass (Sorgum x drummondii) by planting them in succession with a no-till drill throughout the year, 4.) compost treatment consisted of a 2 to 1 mix of hardwood mulch and composted winery pomace applied across both the vineyard aisle and vine dripline. Split-plot nitrogen treatments include: 1.) no nitrogen fertility applied to grapevines, 2). 20 lb. N/ac applied to grapevine dripline at budbreak, bloom and veraison. The randomized complete block design with four main-plot treatments, two split-plot treatments and five blocks was established in 2013 and 2014 in a commercial mature Norton vineyard, planted in 2003, at 2.44 x 3.66 m spacing, in southern Illinois on a Hosmer silt-loam. The canonical analysis of principle components clearly revealed that compost and successional treatments were particularly effective at shifting nematode assemblages to higher populations of cp-5 nematodes to correlate with increases in soil respiration and organic matter, thus indicating establishment of a stable soil health structure both physically and ecologically. The results of the soil health analysis panel (soil respiration, water extracted organic carbon and water extracted macro-and micro-soil elements), consistently supported the interpretation of nematode community structure analysis. In fall 2015 the compost, red fescue and successional groundcovers combined with P and K soil fertility amendments increased water extractable K (WEK) in the aisle by 85%, 59% and 71%, respectively, compared to control; they similarly increased WEK in the aisle by 46%, 59% and 71%, respectively, in summer 2016. In the dripline WEK was increased 140%, 238% and 249%, respectively, by compost, red fescue and successional treatments that received no-N-prescription, compared to the control. The application of prescription-N increased WEK by 25% and 21%, respectively, in the compost and successional treatments that had a generous mulch layer. Soil P response to groundcover treatment clearly distinguished among each treatment the impact of nutrient turnover levels with water extracted P levels: successional > red fescue > compost > control, unique to each treatment. The water extracted mineral element levels detected with the soil health analysis were one-half to one-ninth the concentration extracted with the Mehlich-III test. Red fescue tripled the population of Pratylenchus spp. (236/100cc soil) in the dripline with prescription-N fertilization compared to no-N. Red fescue and successional treatments increased Helicotylenchus spp. populations by ~657% and ~172%, respectively, compared to compost (92/100cc soil) which closely resembled control response average in the dripline across 2015 and 2016. Prescription-N reduced Longidorus spp. by 78% compared to no-N treatment (23/100cc soil) in the dripline of fall 2015. Additionally, prescription-N added to the red fescue and successional treatments reduced Xiphinema spp. populations by 57% and 92%, respectively, compared to the control (52/100cc soil). Compost and successional groundcover treatments dramatically increased grapevine yield and crop size by 38% and 30%; and 29% and 38%, respectively, compared to grower control. The prescription N-fertilizer increased yield and crop size by 13% and 17%, respectively, compared to no-N. Compost and successional also increased Ravaz index by 33% and 60%, respectively, over control without reducing vine size which indicated their future vineyard sustainability.

While there is growing evidence that shade/flood tolerance tradeoffs may be important in distributions of bottomland hardwood trees and indications that they should apply to herbs, no studies have definitively explored this possibility. Four years of field data following historic flooding were supplemented with a greenhouse experiment designed to identify interactions congruent with tradeoffs. Fifteen bottomland species were grown in two levels of water availability and three levels of shade over 10 weeks. Results indicate responses of Fimbristylis vahlii and Ammannia robusta are consistent with tradeoffs. Modification of classical allometric responses to shade by substrate saturation indicates a potential mechanism for the tradeoff in A. robusta. Responses indicating potential for increased susceptibility to physical flooding disturbance are also discussed.

Little is known about arthropod communities inhabiting longleaf pines in the southeastern United States. This information is of particular importance because arthropods serve as the food base for the federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW). In a recent study, this arthropod community has been suggested to be the mechanism by which RCW reproductive success is linked to the groundcover composition of the forest (which is a reflection of the forest's fire history). This is possible because it has been shown that much of the arthropod community found on longleaf pines originates from the forest floor. If the arthropod community is the link between the ground cover and the RCWs' reproductive success then higher amounts of arthropods should be found in areas with groundcover that is indicative of frequent burning. I conducted a one year study at three sites containing RCWs to determine whether the ground cover of the forest influences the abundance and mass of the arthropod communities on longleaf pines. I focused on impacts of groundcover on arthropods by controlling for tree species, tree age, soil type, hardwood midstory density, and overstory basal area. My results show that arthropod biomass was positively and significantly correlated to the percent coverage of herbaceous and graminoid vegetation and was negatively and significantly correlated to the percent coverage of woody vegetation. Arthropod biomass and abundance was also observed to vary seasonally with a peak occurring during spring and summer. Additionally, prescribed fire was not found to have a negative short-term impact on arthropod biomass. / Master of Science

The physical and biological characteristics of a stream are strongly influenced by its surrounding catchment. The riparian zone acts as a buffer between land and water ecosystems and can play an essential role to retain contaminants (e.g. sediment) from entering and affecting the receiving waterway. When the riparian zone is not managed, the consequence can be high amounts of sediment entering the waterway that negatively affects in-stream communities with a decline in native invertebrate and fish populations. I investigated three aspects of riparian management in the Canterbury region, South Island, New Zealand, by investigating the public perception using a questionnaire to determine what the public knows about riparian management and what practices are being done in the farming community. Results showed that riparian management varied across farm types, and there was some confusion about the roles of riparian management. Crop farmers were the least likely to do riparian management, in contrast to dairy farmers who were the most likely to do riparian management. A main concern is that the majority of respondents highlighted that filtering nutrients was the main goal for riparian management, and only 5% thought it was due to sediment, and 10% to decrease erosion. I then conducted a field survey to investigate riparian zone sediment retention in different land-uses (dairy farming, production forestry and urbanisation) compared to native forest. Surprisingly, dairy farms produced the least amount of sediment, and urban areas produced the most, and there was a marginal effect of season. However, generally there was no difference between the amounts of sediment passing through the riparian zone. Therefore, I was unable to distinguish if there were any vegetation effects occurring within the riparian zone. To complement the field survey, I tested sediment overflow by conducting multiple experiments using a rain simulator. The simulator controlled the intensity and amount of rainfall over differing percentages of riparian groundcover. My results were consistent with other studies showing that as groundcover increases, sediment runoff decreases. However, there was no relationship between rainfall intensity and the amount of sediment in runoff. My thesis indicated that riparian planting to reduce sediment flow into streams needs to focus on high amounts of groundcover (such as rank grass).