Submitted by Noeme Timbo (noeme.timbo@metodista.br) on 2016-08-11T18:49:33Z No. of bitstreams: 1 BRUNO CAVALCANTE.pdf: 1499849 bytes, checksum: 2ea03be3dbd4327d7ecd93a9c8695d41 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-11T18:49:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 BRUNO CAVALCANTE.pdf: 1499849 bytes, checksum: 2ea03be3dbd4327d7ecd93a9c8695d41 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-21 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq / The research aims to work the event of Jehu's revolt, together with the stele of Dan, taking as a starting point for such exegesis of the perícope of 2 Kings 10 to 28.36. The story Deuteronomist presents the act of Jehu's revolt as an important achievement too, the cult of the restoration to the Lord in Israel, from a context where the worship of other deities in Israel North, was in full swing. However, from the joint analysis of the stele of Dan, whose probable author King Hazael of Damascus, we are challenged to read this story between the lines not covered by the text, pointing to an active participation of Hazael on outcomes related to revolt of Jehu as being directly responsible that gave the rise of Jehu king in Israel, thus clarifying this important period in the Biblical story. For this analysis, it will be observed three distinct topics directly related to the proposed theme: (1) The Revolt of Jehu and the Deuteronomist Writing, from the exegetical study of the perícope of 2 Kings 10.28 to 36, which are described timely information about the period in which Jehu reigned in Israel; (2) Jehu and the Stele of Dan, from the presentation and analysis of the contents of the stele of Dan, comes directly from the war unfolding in Ramoth-Gilead, where takes place the starting point of the revolt of Jehu; and finally (3) The Empire of Syria, where from the ongoing analysis of the contents of the stele of Dan demonstrate the significance of this kingdom, and notes directly related to the reign of Hazael very important character in the Revolt of Jehu event / A pesquisa tem por objetivo trabalhar o evento da Revolta de Jeú, em conjunto com a Estela de Dã, tendo como ponto de partida para tal, a exegese da perícope de 2 Reis 10-28,36. A história Deuteronomista apresenta o ato da Revolta de Jeú como sendo um feito demasiadamente importante, na restauração do culto a Javé em Israel, a partir de um contexto onde o culto a outras divindades, em Israel Norte, estava em pleno curso. No entanto, a partir da análise conjunta da Estela de Dã, que tem como provável autor o rei Hazael de Damasco, somos desafiados a ler esta história pelas entrelinhas não contempladas pelo texto, que apontam para uma participação ativa de Hazael, nos desfechos referentes a Revolta de Jeú, como sendo o responsável direto que proporcionou a subida de Jeú ao trono em Israel, clarificando desta forma este importante período na história Bíblica. Para tal análise, observar-se-á três distintos tópicos, ligados diretamente ao tema proposto: (1) A Revolta de Jeú e a Redação Deuteronomista, a partir do estudo exegético da perícope de 2 Reis 10,28-36, onde estão descritas informações pontuais sobre período em que Jeú reinou em Israel; (2) Jeú e a Estela de Dã, a partir da apresentação e análise do conteúdo da Estela de Dã, tratando diretamente dos desdobramentos da guerra em Ramote de Gileade, de onde se dá o ponto de partida à Revolta de Jeú; e por fim (3) O Império da Síria, onde a partir da continuidade da análise do conteúdo da Estela de Dã, demonstraremos a significância deste reino, além de apontamentos diretamente ligados ao reinado de Hazael, personagem mui relevante no evento da Revolta de Jeú.

Les Araméens sont une population qui apparait dans le territoire de la Syrie et de la Mésopotamie actuelle au début du premier millénaire avant J.-C. A partir du Xe siècle, ils se transforment de population nomade à population sédentaire, en créant des États territoriaux qui prennent le nom de byt, suivi par le nom du fondateur de chaque dynastie locale. Le présent travail, en partant de l’épineuse question ethnique, cherche à déterminer les caractéristiques des Araméens en particulier en Syrie du Sud aux IXe-VIIIe siècles, pendant la montée du royaume de Damas, et ses relations avec les populations voisines, parmi lesquelles les Israëlites qui se sont confrontés avec eux plusieurs fois pendant des périodes alternées de guerres et de paix. Il s’agit d’une étude détaillée de la région méridionale de la Syrie qui s’appuie sur l’analyse des sources épigraphiques (inscriptions araméennes, annales assyriennes et passages bibliques) et sur les données archéologiques des sites de “possible” occupation araméenne au Sud de Damas, en Palestine et en Jordanie du Nord. A travers la comparaison des ces données, j’ai cherché à fournir une reconstruction vraisemblable du contexte historique du royaume de Damas aux IXe-VIIIe siècles av. J.-C., de la figure du souverain Hazael et de l’ expansion politique de son royaume jusqu’à la soumission par les Assyriens. / The Arameans are a population settled in the territory of modern Syria and Mesopotamia in the first millennium BC. Starting from the tenth century, they gradually leave their nomadic lifestyle to turn into a sedentary population by creating territorial states under the name of “Byt”, after the name of the founder of each local dynasty. In this work, starting from the controversial question about ethnics, we seek to determine the representative characteristics of Aramaeans, especially for those settled in southern Syria in the ninth-eighth centuries, during the rise of the Damascus kingdom. We investigate this latter relationships with neighboring populations, especially the Israelites who were confronted with them several times during alternate periods of war and peace. This is a detailed study of the southern part of Syria based on the analysis of epigraphic sources (Aramaic inscriptions, Assyrian annals and Bible) and archaeological data coming from some sites (south of Damascus, Palestine and North Jordan ) known to be occupated by Arameans. Through the comparison of these data, we try to provide a plausible reconstruction of the historical context of the kingdom of Damascus in the ninth-eighth centuries BC., the figure of the king Hazael, its political expansion till its falling due to the Assyrians domination.