• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Avaliação da eficácia e segurança do daclatasvir e sofosbuvir versus alfapeginterferona 2A no tratamento da hepatite C crônica

BARROS, Luciana Tavares de Carvalho 09 June 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Alice Araujo (alice.caraujo@ufpe.br) on 2018-06-05T18:24:22Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO Luciana Tavares de Carvalho Barros.pdf: 978217 bytes, checksum: 9bbd97bc0d108d6999496e25f30b47df (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-05T18:24:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO Luciana Tavares de Carvalho Barros.pdf: 978217 bytes, checksum: 9bbd97bc0d108d6999496e25f30b47df (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-09 / A Hepatite C representa um grande impacto na saúde pública em todo o mundo. Interfere na vida dos portadores de HCV, na sociedade, no sistema de saúde e na economia. No Brasil, os medicamentos são de alto custo, apresentam terapias prolongadas e com efeitos colaterais nos tratamentos convencionais. Com evolução das novas tecnologias incorporadas ao SUS em 2015, há expectativa do aumento da resposta virológica e cura. Objetivos: Avaliar a eficácia e segurança do Daclatasvir e Sofosbuvir versus Alfapeginterferona 2A na Hepatite C Crônica. Método: Busca em dados eletrônicos: MedLine via PubMed, LILACS e Biblioteca Cochrane, com critérios: ensaios clínicos Randomizados (ECR) e Revisões Sistemáticas (RS) em Hepatite C Crônica. Resultados: Incluídos 01 ECR com a Daclatasvir e sofosbuvir com a ribavirina e 01 RS com Metanálise, somente ECR, que avaliou a terapia com interferon peguilado alfa 2A e alfa 2B associado a ribavirina, com ou sem inibidores de protease. Quanto à eficácia, o ECR identificou aqueles que contemplavam o Daclatasvir com o sofobusvir possuíam altos índices de resposta virológica sustentada. A eficácia reportada pela RS favorece ao uso da peginterferona alfa 2A. Conclusões: A segurança das intervenções foi analisada apenas no ECR na qual foi medida através do surgimento de eventos adversos durante e depois do tratamento. Como nos estudos relatam a eficácia das drogas de acordo com parâmetros diferentes, dificultando assim comparações mesmo que de forma indireta. / Introduction: Hepatitis C represents a major impact in public health worldwide.It Interferes in the lives of patients with HCV, in society, in the health system and the economy. In Brazil, medicaments are expensive and have length and side effects of conventional treatments therapies. With the evolution of new technologies incorporated into the SUS in 2015, there’s a expectation of a higher virologic response and healing. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Daclatasvir and sofosbuvir versus peginterferon alfa-2a in Chronic Hepatitis C. Method: Searching electronic data: Medline via PubMed, LILACS and Cochrane Library, with criteria: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and Systematic Reviews (RS) in Chronic Hepatitis C. Results: Included with the ECR 01 and Daclatasvir sofosbuvir with ribavirin and RS 01 Metanalysis with only RCT, evaluating therapy with pegylated interferon alpha 2A and alpha-2B in combination with ribavirin, with or without protease inhibitors. As for effectiveness, the ECR identified those contemplated the Daclatasvir with sofobusvir had high rates of sustained virologic response. The efficacy reported by RS favors the use of peginterferon alfa 2a. Conclusions: The safety of interventions was only examined in the ECR in which was measured by the appearance of adverse events during and after treatment. As the studies report the effectiveness of drugs, according to different parameters, making comparisons difficult, even indirectly, about which interventions have better effectiveness.

Page generated in 0.1049 seconds