Submitted as the dissertation component in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of a Masters in Technology in Chiropractic in the department of Chiropractic and Somatology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2017. / Background: Hip pain is a common problem. Motion palpation is a manual technique applied by the hands in various degrees of joint motion that specifically evaluates range of motion in relation to specific anatomical landmarks, joint play and end feel. Motion palpation remains one of the most used diagnostic techniques and yet it remains unclear whether or not it is a reliable, sensitive and specific tool; especially in the hip joint. Objectives: This study assessed intra- and inter-examiner reliability and clinical responsiveness of motion palpation when it is used as a diagnostic tool in patients with non-specific unilateral anterior hip pain and unilateral asymptomatic hip joints. Methods: Ten participants, between the ages of 18 and 60, were included in this study (three ballet dancers, three golfers and four participants from the general population). The participants were assessed randomly by three blinded examiners. All of the participants then received one adjustment delivered by the researcher (half on the symptomatic side and half on the asymptomatic). The participants were then re-assessed. Data was recorded on a data collection sheet and analysed using SPSS version 23. Intra-examiner reliability and clinical responsiveness were analysed using McNemar’s test and the Chi-Square Test of Independence. Inter-examiner reliability was analysed using Fleiss’ Kappa. Results: Intra-examiner reliability showed to be markedly better on the left-hand side for all three examiners. Kappa scores for inter-examiner reliability varied from none to perfect. The average pairwise agreement scores ranged from 33.3% to 100% at the first assessment, and from 46.6% to 100% in the second assessment. A mean and standard deviation were calculated for the pairwise agreements which represented the sensitivity and specificity respectively. Both showed improvement between the first and second assessments which is positive for inter-examiner reliability. Clinical responsiveness was shown to be absent for examiners A and B but was present for examiner C on the left. Conclusion: This study found that, contrary to the expectations of many clinicians, motion palpation has limited to poor levels of intra-examiner reliability, inter-examiner reliability and clinical responsiveness. This is however limited by the small sample size and methodological limitations in this study. Therefore, the role of palpation as a diagnostic tool used in the diagnosis hip dysfunction may be limited. / M

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2018. / Background: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a common ailment treated by chiropractors. Most chiropractors focus on the localised lumbar area of pain. Other chiropractors focus on restoring function to compensating articulations in the ‗full kinematic chain‘ by assessing and treating the lower extremity in conjunction to the low back. Patients with LBP often exhibit decreased hip-related ranges of motion that may result in future LBP, relapse and a prolonged recovery time. Studies investigating the effect of treating the kinematic chain in relation to LBP are limited and the literature, although widely taught and practiced, is largely anecdotal. Chiropractic manipulation has shown to be effective in the treatment of LBP and many lower extremity conditions. Objectives: This study set out to determine if a combination of low back and hip manipulation would result in a more beneficial outcome for the participant, suffering with CNSLBP, than low back manipulation alone in terms of objective and subjective outcomes. Method: The study was a randomised controlled clinical trial which, through purposive sampling, consisted of 50 participants with CNSLBP and hip joint dysfunction. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each [A and B]. Group A received low back manipulation alone and Group B received combined low back and hip manipulation. Subjective data was obtained through the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI) and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Objective data was obtained through the use of a Force Dial Algometer and an Inclinometer. Data collection occurred at the first, third and fifth consultations and was coded and analysed using IBM SPSS version 24.0. A p-value value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically relevant. Results: Intra-group testing showed that there was a significant difference over time, within both groups, with regards to internal rotation and external rotation of the hip, flexion of the lumbar spine, increased pain tolerance in Algometer tests, decreased NPRS values and decreased ODI scores. Within Group A, the mean scores for hip flexion reflected a more significant increase over time than those of Group B. Within Group B, the mean scores for left and right rotation of the lumbar spine reflected a more significant change over time than those of Group A. Inter-group testing showed no significantly differential treatment effect for any of the subjective and objective outcomes. This means that both treatments were equally effective and the hypothesis, that suggested that Group B would improve more than Group A, was incorrect. Conclusion: Both treatment groups improved subjectively and objectively with regards to CNSLBP. Inter-group testing showed that statistically, and for all outcome measurements, there were no significant differences between the two treatment group‘s results. This suggested that there was no additional benefit in combining hip joint manipulation with low back manipulation in the treatment of CNSLBP. / M