蔡澤霖. / 複印手稿本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Fu yin shou gao ben. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 238-248). / Cai Zelin. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / 緒言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一章 --- 海盜的成因 --- p.5 / Chapter 甲 --- 飢民入海為盜 --- p.25 / Chapter 乙 --- 陸賊入海為盜 --- p.31 / Chapter 丙 --- 官兵叛而為盜 --- p.35 / Chapter 丁 --- 海禁使民為盜 --- p.38 / Chapter 戊 --- 明亡後．義民入海為盜 --- p.49 / Chapter 己 --- 安南海盜到閩．粤滋擾 --- p.53 / 第一章註釋 --- p.65 / Chapter 第二章 --- 海盜的組織學裝備 --- p.74 / Chapter 甲 --- 海盜部眾之來源 --- p.74 / Chapter 乙 --- 海盜的組織 --- p.79 / Chapter 丙 --- 海盜的裝備 --- p.91 / Chapter 一 --- 海盜裝備的來源 --- p.91 / Chapter 二 --- 海盜裝備的種類 --- p.94 / 第二章註釋 --- p.104 / Chapter 第三章 --- 海盜的刦掠與作戰方法 --- p.109 / Chapter 甲 --- 海盜的刦掠方法 --- p.110 / Chapter 乙 --- 海盜作戰方法 --- p.120 / 第三章注釋 --- p.131 / Chapter 第四章 --- 閩粤地方對付海盜之法及海盜猖獗原因 --- p.135 / Chapter 甲 --- 海盜猖獗原因 --- p.136 / Chapter 乙 --- 海盜猖獗原因 --- p.155 / 第四章注釋 --- p.180 / Chapter 第五章 --- 明嘉靖至清嘉慶閩粤海盜一覽表 --- p.186 / 結語 --- p.232 / 徵引書目 --- p.238

論文(碩士)--香港中文大學,1977. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 154-162). / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue,1977. / 序言 --- p.i-ii / Chapter 第一章 --- 在北宋朝廷眼中的四川 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 北宋朝廷的國家觀念 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二節 --- 四川對北宋的特殊作用 --- p.7 / Chapter 第三節 --- 防變政策與四川的安全　 --- p.19 / Chapter 第四節 --- 北宋對蜀民的統治態度 --- p.33 / Chapter 第二章 --- 北宋對於四川所採的各項特殊措施 --- p.52 / Chapter 第一節 --- 民政上的措施 --- p.52 / Chapter 第二節 --- 軍政上的措施 --- p.65 / Chapter 第三節 --- 官制上的措施 --- p.72 / Chapter 第三章 --- 對四川的經濟剝削情形 --- p.123 / Chapter 第一節 --- 四川的經濟發達程度 --- p.124 / Chapter 第二節 --- 經濟剝削的手段 --- p.135 / 結論 --- p.153 / 参考書目 --- p.154

Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 955-974). / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / Chapter <一> --- 大豐□ --- p.1-119 / 叙論 --- p.1 / 滙釋 --- p.6 / 註釋 --- p.110 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.115 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.119 / Chapter <二> --- 小臣單觶 --- p.120-148 / 叙論 --- p.120 / 滙釋 --- p.120 / 註釋 --- p.143 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.145 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.148 / Chapter <三> --- 令□ --- p.149-263 / 叙論 --- p.149 / 滙釋 --- p.152 / 註釋 --- p.254 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.258 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.263 / Chapter <四> --- 令□ --- p.264-480 / 叙論 --- p.264 / 滙釋 --- p.267 / 註釋 --- p.469 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.476 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.480 / Chapter <五> --- 明公□ --- p.481-516 / 叙論 --- p.481 / 滙釋 --- p.483 / 註釋 --- p.512 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.514 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.516 / Chapter <六> --- □□ --- p.517-531 / 叙論 --- p.517 / 滙釋 --- p.518 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.530 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.531 / Chapter <七> --- 禽□ --- p.532-572 / 叙論 --- p.532 / 滙釋 --- p.536 / 註釋 --- p.569 / 本器參考書目錄 --- p.570 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.572 / Chapter <八> --- □□ --- p.573-609 / 叙論 --- p.573 / 滙釋 --- p.575 / 註釋 --- p.606 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.607 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.609 / Chapter <九> --- □尊 --- p.610-628 / 叙論 --- p.610 / 滙釋 --- p.613 / 註釋 --- p.626 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.627 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.628 / Chapter <十> --- 疐鼎 --- p.629-655 / 叙論 --- p.629 / 滙釋 --- p.633 / 註釋 --- p.652 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.653 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.655 / Chapter <十一> --- 班□ --- p.656-739 / 叙論 --- p.656 / 滙釋 --- p.659 / 註釋 --- p.733 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.736 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.739 / Chapter <十二> --- 小臣謎□ --- p.740-786 / 叙論 --- p.740 / 滙釋 --- p.743 / 註釋 --- p.780 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.782 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.785 / Chapter <十三> --- 小臣宅□ --- p.787-805 / 叙論 --- p.787 / 滙釋 --- p.789 / 註釋 --- p.802 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.803 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.805 / Chapter <十四> --- 師旂鼎 --- p.806-844 / 叙論 --- p.806 / 滙釋 --- p.809 / 註釋 --- p.841 / 本器參考書目錄 --- p.842 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.844 / Chapter <十五> --- 大保□ --- p.845-872 / 叙論 --- p.845 / 滙釋 --- p.848 / 註釋 --- p.869 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.870 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.872 / Chapter <十六> --- □鼎 --- p.873-887 / 叙論 --- p.873 / 滙釋 --- p.874 / 註釋 --- p.884 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.885 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.887 / Chapter <十七> --- 員鼎 --- p.888-901 / 叙論 --- p.888 / 滙釋 --- p.889 / 註釋 --- p.899 / 本器參考書目錄 --- p.900 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.901 / Chapter <十八> --- 原趠□ --- p.902-912 / 叙論 --- p.902 / 滙釋 --- p.904 / 本器參考書目錄 --- p.911 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.912 / Chapter <十九> --- 令鼎 --- p.913-935 / 叙論 --- p.913 / 滙釋 --- p.914 / 註釋 --- p.932 / 本器參考書目錄 --- p.933 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.935 / Chapter <二十> --- 臣辰盉 --- p.936-954 / 叙論 --- p.936 / 滙釋 --- p.938 / 註釋 --- p.951 / 本器參考書及論文目錄 --- p.952 / 與本器有關參考資料 --- p.954 / 本文參考書及論文總目 --- p.955-969

No description available.

No description available.

陸文雪. / 論文(哲學博士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (p. 228-236). / 中英文摘要. / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest Information and Learning Company, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / Lu Wenxue. / Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Lun wen (zhe xue bo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (p. 228-236).

This thesis explores the perception of the emperor in the mentalités of his subjects, exploring the different ways he was understood. Drawing upon written material from Augustus to Alexander Severus, this thesis explores the roles he was cast in, alluding to a discourse concerning who the emperor was and what he should be, exploring similarities across the period. It is argued the participants in this conversation are not restricted to an elite, but also involved scrutiny from a wider population. Accordingly, this thesis is an alternative history about how the Emperor seemed. It is split into three parts according to episodes of an emperor's life: Part 1 and Chapter 1 explore the nature of the succession, including a discussion of the scholarship concerning the nature of the emperor's power and its transmission. It explores the nature of the succession, the imperial family, and perception of this issue from the perspective of his subjects. Part 2 explores the discourse about the emperor's conduct during his reign. Chapter 2 discusses the issues with the evidence, and how to glean a wider perspective. Chapter 3 is a thematic treatment of the 'topics of conversation' within the discourse, and each help to describe the 'thought-world' concerning the emperor, involving the fears and expectations of his roles in government, culture, and society; from the banal to the fantastic. Part 3 and Chapter 4 concern the emperor's legacy. It discusses the impression of the emperor's timelessness, and the comparability of the emperorship. This is reflected in the afterlife of an emperor, showing the relevancy of dead emperors to subsequent generations, and is manifested in diverse ways, from historical discourse to the appearance of false emperors. Finally, comparability is stressed, opening possibilities for further study on the nature of the emperorship as an example of autocracy.

No description available.

No description available.

The Galatians were a group of Celts who arrived in Anatolia from the west in 278 B.C. According to the historical sources, they earned their livelihood by plundering and by serving as mercenaries in the eastern Mediterranean. Ancient authors state that the Galatians constituted a definite threat to the cities of western Asia Minor before they were settled in central Anatolia. Galatia became a Roman province in 25 B.C.; by that time, the Galatians had been thoroughly absorbed by the local population. The purpose of this paper is to see what archaeological evidence exists for the presence of the Galatians in Anatolia during the pre-provincial period, and how that evidence can be obtained. Three types of evidence are examined: pottery, burials and grave goods, and forts and settlements. Galatian pottery is still a controversial subject requiring more study and excavation. Only one burial site, Karalar, can definitely be identified by an inscription in Greek. The evidence from this site suggests that the Galatians adopted various types of Hellenistic tomb architecture and that they placed a fundamentally Hellenistic selection of grave goods within their tombs and graves. Galatian burials are therefore hard to distinguish from ordinary Hellenistic burials in Anatolia. Three tores and three fibulae from burials at Karalar, Bolu, and Bogazk5y are probably Celtic; that there are so few of them suggests that they had been imported from Europe, and that the Galatians were not themselves metalworkers in the Celtic tradition. Such objects cannot be used as the sole means of identifying Galatian burials. The situation is little better for forts and settlements. Some have been identified because they were inhabited by literate people before or after the arrival of the Galatians; others have been suggested because of the likelihood of their location. Settlement seems to be more dense west of the Halys but more surveys and excavation are necessary to test this emerging pattern. So far, the pre-provincial period has yielded little in the way of archaeological evidence for the presence of the Galatians in Anatolia, despite the solid background provided by the historical sources. The Galatians had little connection with the European Celts and adapted easily to local customs. This capacity for adaptation makes it difficult to say what is Galatian and what is Anatolian Hellenistic. Only further work in the field can remedy this state of affairs. / Arts, Faculty of / Classical, Near Eastern and Religious Studies, Department of / Graduate