Les gènes Hox sont responsables de l’identité des segments le long de l’axe antéro-postérieur. Ils sont évolutivement conservés et codent des facteurs de transcription. In vitro, toutes les protéines Hox se lient à des séquences nucléotidiques très similaires via un domaine de liaison à l’ADN très conservé, l’homéodomaine (HD). Cette faible spécificité de liaison à l’ADN in vitro contraste avec leur spécificité d’action in vivo. Une manière d’expliquer ce paradoxe est que les protéines Hox agissent en interaction avec des protéines cofacteurs, dont le mieux caractérisé est Extradenticle (Exd) chez la drosophile, Pbx chez les mammifères (collectivement appelés PBC). L’interaction Hox-PBC s’appui sur un motif conservé chez la presque totalité des protéines Hox, situé en amont de l’HD, le motif Hexapeptide (HX). Des travaux récents au sein de notre équipe ont montré l’existence d’un nouveau mode d’interaction Hox-PBC, non-générique, médié par un motif spécifique à certains groupes de paralogies seulement, et situé en en C-terminal de l’HD. Ceci souligne que les interactions Hox-PBC, qui spécifient la fonction des protéines Hox, reposent sur de modes multiples d’interaction.Mes travaux de thèse ont porté sur le mode d’action des protéines Hox, en étudiant la fonction de trois motifs ayant un rôle démontré ou potentiel dans le recrutement du cofacteur Exd par la protéine Hox de drosophile AbdominalA (AbdA). L’approche empruntée visait à analyser de manière globale la manière dont chacun de ces motifs pris isolément, ou en interaction, définit la fonction d’AbdA. Les conclusions de ce travail soulignent l’absence de pléiotropie fonctionnelle et un haut degré d’interactivité entre ces motifs. Le second volet de ma thèse a été d’initier la découverte de nouveaux motifs fonctionnels au sein des protéines Hox. J’ai abordé cette question en sélectionnant des modules phylogénétiquement conservés. Afin d’évaluer leur fonction, ces motifs ont été mutés et l’impact de leur mutation a été analysé in vitro et in vivo. Les résultats obtenus ont permis l’identification d’au moins un domaine protéique qui contribue de manière prédominante à la fonction de la protéine Dfd. / Hox genes are responsible for the identity of segments along the antero-posterior axis. They are evolutionarily conserved and encode transcription factors. In vitro, all Hox proteins bind to a similar nucleotide sequence via a highly conserved DNA binding domain, the homeodomain (HD). This low specificity of DNA binding in vitro contrasts with their specificity in vivo. One way to explain this paradaox is that Hox protein function with protein cofactors, best represented by Extradenticle (Exd) in Drosophila, Pbx in mammals (collectivaly refered as PBC). Hox-PBC interaction relies on a motif located upstream of the HD, conserved in most Hox proteins, the Hexapeptide (HX). Recent work in our group identified a novel mode of Hox-PBC interaction, non-generic, specific to a subset only of Hox paralog groups, and relying on a motif located C-terminal to the HD. This highlight plasticity in Hox-PBC interaction.My PhD work aimed at investigating the mode of action of Hox protein, by studying the function of three protein motifs, with known or putative role in Exd recruitment by the Drosophila Hox protein AbdominalA (AbdA). The approach taken aimed at analyzing, using a large functional window, how these motifs, taken in isolation or collectively, define AbdA protein activity. Conclusions highlight the absence of pleitropy and a high degree of functional interaction for these protein motifs. The second part of my PhD work has been to initiate the search for novel functionally important protein motifs within Hox proteins. This was approached by selecting phylogenetically conserved motifs, and addressing their function in vitro and in vivo following motif mutations. At least one functional domain was isolated, that contributes predominantly to Dfd protein function.

Hox genes are regulatory genes encoding small proteins containing a highly conserved 61-amino acid motif, the homeodomain, that enables Hox proteins to bind to DNA at specifically recognised binding sites and transcriptionally activate their target genes. In mammalian species there are 39 Hox genes and they are structural and functional homologs of the Drosophila homeotic complex (Horn-C). During embryogenesis and early development the Hox genes are expressed in a spatiotemporal fashion, where they operate as master transcriptional regulators. Hox genes are further expressed in fully differentiated adult cells, potentially in a tissue-specific manner involving maintenance of the normal phenotype. In selected oncogenic transformations, dysregulated Hox gene expression has been observed, indicating an involvement of these transcriptional regulators in carcinogenesis and metastasis. Utilising quantitative real-time PCR assays, these studies investigated the expression patterns of 20 Hox genes and two wellcharacterised Hox cofactors (Pbx and Meis) in malignant and non-malignant human breast and skin cancer cells. Dysregulated Hox expression was observed for all malignancies tested, of which some misexpressed Hox genes seemed random, whereas other Hox transcripts showed altered levels potentially corresponding with the invasive capacity of the cells. Also, the Hox cofactors Pbx and Meis showed no marked changes in expression levels from the non-malignant to the malignant phenotypes, indicating that it is dysregulated Hox gene expression rather than dysregulated gene expression of Hox cofactors that potentially commit the cell to redifferentiate and undergo oncogenic transformation. Although the Hox proteins are known to be key transcriptional regulators of development, the mechanisms by which they gain their in vivo functional specificity is still largely unknown. They all show strikingly similar transcriptional specificity in vitro, yet show unique specificity in their in vivo environment. This paradox has been the subject of intense scrutiny, however very few direct Hox target genes have been identified, making it a difficult task to decipher the exact manner in which Hox proteins exert their functional potential. Therefore, the studies presented herein were aimed at identifying further Hox target genes in the human system. Utilising differential display approaches, several potential downstream target genes were isolated. Substantiated with real-time PCR assays, one of these potential targets was selected as a likely direct Hox gene target, and as such subjected to further studies. By the combination of bioinformatic analyses, transfection protocols and luciferase assays, a gene encoding the SR-related protein SRrpl3O was shown to be trans-activated in vitro by HOXD4 via a putative Hox binding element within its promoter region. This is the first reported link between Hox transcription factors and the SR and SR-related family of pre-mRNA splicing proteins, offering a new and exciting insight into the complex nature of Hox functional specificity. Finally, this thesis also puts forward new ideas regarding how the Hox proteins gain their transcriptional and functional specificity. Utilising bioinformatic tools in conjunction with performing an extensive review of the disparate catalogue of Hox-related research reports, work herein offers the first comprehensive analysis of the mammalian Hox gene targets in relation to their promoter structures, as well as with respect to the expanded Hox DNA-binding elements. This work reports that identified Hox targets generally contain TATA-less core promoters, many of which have several GC-box elements. The Hox binding elements show no apparent preference regarding their location relative to the transcription start site (TSS), as they are found both upstream and downstream of the TSS, as well as being located close to proximal core promoter elements for some genes and at more distant positions in other gene promoters. Finally, the core Hox binding element TAAT/ATTA contains only part of the necessary recognition sequence involved in Hox-DNA binding, and the notion that flanking base pairs dictate trans-regulatory potential is further explored with the hypothesis that the immediate 3' base pair dictates an activator/repressor-switch of the Hox trans-regulatory effect.

No description available.

Les gènes Hox codent des facteurs de transcription à homéodomain (HD). Bien que ce dernier reconnaisse des séquences similaires in vitro, les protéines Hox achèvent des fonctions hautement spécifiques in vivo. Des séquences protéiques en dehors de l’HD influencent la spécificité d’action des protéines Hox par le recrutement de cofacteurs, dont le mieux caractérisé est Extradenticle (Exd) chez la drosophile. Des travaux récents au sein de notre équipe ont démontré la contribution fonctionnelle de trois motifs de AbdA, aussi bien dans des fonctions Exd-dépendantes qu’à des fonctions Exd-indépendantes. Mon travail de thèse a porté sur la caractérisation de la contribution des motifs protéiques de AbdA dans la sélection puis dans la régulation des gènes cibles en utilisant une approche combinée ChIPseq/RNAseq, dans un contexte Exd-indépendant. Le code ADN identifié nous a renseigné sur la présence d’inputs transcriptionnels additionnels. Ces derniers correspondant à des facteurs de transcription déjà connus, leur présence dans un complexe protéique avec AbdA a été démontrée par des analyses de spectrométrie de masse. Un second volet de mon travail de thèse a été l’identification de modifications post-traductionnelles pouvant rendre compte d’un mécanisme de régulation de l’activité des protéines Hox. Des analyses prédictives in silico, confirmées par des approches biochimiques et des analyses in vivo ont démontré la SUMOylation de AbdA. Ces résultats préliminaires posent les bases pour des travaux futures qui auront pour objectif d’identifier les résidus d’AbdA SUMOylés et d’élucider le rôle de cette modification dans la régulation de l’activité de la protéine AbdA. / Hox genes encode homeodomain-containing transcription factors (HD). Although the HD binds to similar DNA sequences in vitro, Hox proteins display a high functional specificity in vivo. Protein motifs outside of the HD influence Hox specificity through recruiting additional cofactors, with the best characterized being Extradenticle (Exd in Drosophila). Recent evidence from our group has uncovered the functional contribution of AbdA intrinsic motifs to AbdA Exd-dependent functions as well as AbdA Exd-independent functions. My PhD work has aimed to characterize the contribution of AbdA motifs to target gene selection and regulation using a combined approach of ChIPseq/RNAseq in an Exd-independent context. The DNA code identified provides us with new insights about additional transcriptional inputs from additional DNA-binding proteins lying in the vicinity of AbdA recognition sites. Mass spectrometry analysis establishes the occurrence of these additional DNA binding proteins in a multi-protein complex with AbdA. Deciphering the involvement of post-translational modifications in the regulation of Hox protein activity was another aspect of my PhD work. In silico predictive analysis, followed by biochemical approaches and in vivo assays reveal the potential for SUMOylation of AbdA as a potentially important regulatory component of AbdA activity. These preliminary results set the bases for further work aimed at identifying SUMOylated residues on AbdA and the functional relevance of such post-translational modification on AbdA activity regulation.