Thesis (Ph. D.)--Duke University, 1997. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 259-273).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Aberdeen University, 2008. / Title from web page (viewed on July 14, 2009). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.S. in Security Studies (Civil-Military Relations))--Naval Postgraduate School, March 2006. / AD-A445 551. "March 2006." Includes bibliographical references (p. 119-125). Also available online.

Thesis (D. Min.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 1996. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 290-309).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Logos Evangelical Seminary, 2007. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 214-238).

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Sydney, 2008. / Title from title screen (viewed January 14, 2009) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts to the Dept. of Hebrew, Biblical & Jewish Studies. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in print form.

This study examines how the South African Department of Home Affair’s asylum policies, laws, and implementation of those policies speak to South Africa’s commitment (both legally and socially) to protecting human rights. Specifically, this study analyzes the 2017 policy papers, 2017 Amendment to the Refugees Act, and the Director-General’s decision to close the Cape Town Refugee Reception Office.

In this thesis I argue against the proportionality test in human rights adjudication, and provide a framework for understanding the proportionality debate. I identify two accounts of proportionality. One sees proportionality as a doctrinal tool aimed at maximising rights and public interests. The other sees proportionality as allowing for open- ended moral reasoning. I analyse the two accounts and identify their main deficiencies. I argue against both conceptions, and conclude that defenders of proportionality are in the following dilemma: either proportionality is insensitive to important moral considerations related to human rights and their limitations, and thus it is an unsuitable tool for human rights adjudication; or proportionality can accommodate the relevant moral considerations, but at the price of leaving the judge undirected, unaided by the law. I will further argue that lack of guidance is a deficiency in legal adjudication, which has important negative effects.

This thesis is primarily concerned with the question of personality in international law. In order to assessp ersonality the vehicles of the Palestinian situation and representation of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip are used. Therefore at points in the study each dominates in order to further the overall thesis. The study looks beyond the jaded constitutive/declaratory debate regarding recognition and personality and examines recent state practice, which sheds further light on the issue. A flexible approach to personality is taken and it is asserted that the best description of the process of recognition and achievement of status for both emerging states and representative groups is that an entity's status can be variable: variable in an evolutionary sense, in relation to the range of responses which the international community may have and also in relation to status on the international stage. Thus an entity may operate with different degrees of status at any one point in time depending on with whom and what circumstances are in question. This theory is then examined in relation to the Palestinian situation. The progression of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation and the Palestinian Authority on the world stage is investigated through, inter alia, their relationships with other states and international organisations. The variability theory asserted above appears to be borne out in the Palestinian context which leads on to questions of what broader implications this may have for other areas of international law. Two subject areas are then discussed in relation to the implications of the theory of variable personality. First, the concept of responsibility which has traditionally been adopted in relation to states rather than other entities on the international stage. Second, the protection of the rights of those placed under the jurisdiction of an entity with variable levels of personality, noting that this is also an issue which is generally dealt with at a state level. In each examination the Palestinian situation is drawn upon to provide concrete examples of the possible problems which may arise for other areas of international law due to the theory of variable personality. Examples of ways in which those issues could be reconciled are also considered. Lastly, both subject areas provide further important conclusions in relation to the assertion that personality may be variable.

No abstract / Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / Centre for Human Rights / unrestricted