Spelling suggestions: "subject:"humanitarian intervention."" "subject:"umanitarian intervention.""
1 |
Politics with a conscience? assessing the role of norm entrenchment in humanitarian (non-)intervention /Abdel-Aaty, Lamis. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.). / Written for the Dept. of Political Science. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2008/01/11). Includes bibliographical references.
|
2 |
Norms, interests and humanitarian interventionGlanville, Luke. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (MA)--Macquarie University, Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dept. of Modern History, 2005. / Submitted in fullfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) Macquarie University, Division of Humanities, Dept. of Modern History. 2005. Bibliography: p. 268-290.
|
3 |
Norm emergence and humanitarian interventionBartlett, Brendan C. January 2008 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.A. in Security Studies (Defense Decision-Making))--Naval Postgraduate School, December 2008. / Thesis Advisor(s): Clunan, Anne. "December 2008." Description based on title screen as viewed on January 29, 2009. Includes bibliographical references (p. 129-141). Also available in print.
|
4 |
The role of right intentions in humanitarian military interventions /Davidovic, Jovana, January 2004 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.A.) in Liberal Studies--University of Maine, 2004. / Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 92-95).
|
5 |
The Role of Right Intentions in Humanitarian Military InterventionsDavidovic, Jovana January 2004 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
6 |
The responsibility to protect and the notion of irresponsibility in international lawSamara, Angeliki January 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The responsibility to protect : legal rights and obligations to save humans from mass murder and ethnic cleansingKolb, Andreas Stephan 11 1900 (has links)
The context for this work is set by the proliferation of intrastate conflicts and the international
legal debate of humanitarian intervention. The thesis specifically addresses the concept of the
“Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) as formulated by the International Commission on Intervention
and State Sovereignty (ICISS). The objective is to assess the present quality of R2P as a concept
of international law.
Five components of the R2P framework are discussed: the primary responsibility of every state
to protect its population from large-scale killings and large-scale ethnic cleansing; the right of
other states to collective humanitarian intervention through the United Nations; a right of
unilateral humanitarian intervention without prior Security Council authorization; the
responsibility of the international community to take military action; and the criteria for external
military involvement.
Methodologically, the analysis is grounded in the dominant theory of legal positivism and its
doctrine of sources, which requires notably an analysis of treaties and customary international
law. An ethical theory is devised and applied, however, to remedy inadequacies of a strictly
positivist method that sets out to determine international law solely on the basis of hard facts.
These ethical considerations serve as a background theory to provide guidance in difficult cases
of treaty or customary law analysis, and they fill gaps in positive international law as legally
binding “principles of ethical law”.
In conclusion, the individual components of R2P differ in terms of their legal status and the
degree to which it can be explained by the traditional posivist approach to international law. The
primary responsibility of every state has become accepted as a hard norm of international
customary law; the right of collective humanitarian intervention is provided for in Chapter VII of
the UN Charter; a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention has become part of the
international legal system as a “principle of ethical law”; the residual responsibility of the
international community is a principle of “legal soft law”; finally, positive international law
defines no criteria delineating the permissible and required use of force for the protection of
foreign populations.
|
8 |
The responsibility to protect : legal rights and obligations to save humans from mass murder and ethnic cleansingKolb, Andreas Stephan 11 1900 (has links)
The context for this work is set by the proliferation of intrastate conflicts and the international
legal debate of humanitarian intervention. The thesis specifically addresses the concept of the
“Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) as formulated by the International Commission on Intervention
and State Sovereignty (ICISS). The objective is to assess the present quality of R2P as a concept
of international law.
Five components of the R2P framework are discussed: the primary responsibility of every state
to protect its population from large-scale killings and large-scale ethnic cleansing; the right of
other states to collective humanitarian intervention through the United Nations; a right of
unilateral humanitarian intervention without prior Security Council authorization; the
responsibility of the international community to take military action; and the criteria for external
military involvement.
Methodologically, the analysis is grounded in the dominant theory of legal positivism and its
doctrine of sources, which requires notably an analysis of treaties and customary international
law. An ethical theory is devised and applied, however, to remedy inadequacies of a strictly
positivist method that sets out to determine international law solely on the basis of hard facts.
These ethical considerations serve as a background theory to provide guidance in difficult cases
of treaty or customary law analysis, and they fill gaps in positive international law as legally
binding “principles of ethical law”.
In conclusion, the individual components of R2P differ in terms of their legal status and the
degree to which it can be explained by the traditional posivist approach to international law. The
primary responsibility of every state has become accepted as a hard norm of international
customary law; the right of collective humanitarian intervention is provided for in Chapter VII of
the UN Charter; a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention has become part of the
international legal system as a “principle of ethical law”; the residual responsibility of the
international community is a principle of “legal soft law”; finally, positive international law
defines no criteria delineating the permissible and required use of force for the protection of
foreign populations.
|
9 |
Rwanda and the moral obligation of humanitarian intervention /Kassner, Joshua James. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.) -- University of Maryland, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references. Includes bibliographical references (p. 210-219). Also available via the World Wide Web.
|
10 |
Stories and past lessons understanding U.S. decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention in the post-Cold War era /Peterson, Shannon, January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2003. / Title from first page of PDF file. Document formatted into pages; contains xii, 420 p.; also includes graphics Includes bibliographical references (p. 411-420). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center
|
Page generated in 0.1197 seconds