Instream structures are used to reinforce channel margins, redirect flows, and create habitat, but there is little consensus about their design or whether they function as intended. In this study, 536 instream structures in the state of Maryland were assessed to determine the effect of structure-, project-, and watershed-scale factors on performance. Structures were assessed using a 19 point scoring system based on structural stability, sediment transport, and overall function. Structure-scale variables related to the construction, geometry, and placement, and differed for six structure families: bank protection (BP), full and partial span vanes (FSV), constructed riffles (RF), regenerative stream conveyances, and step pools. Project- and watershed-scale variables related to flow, erosion resistance, and design approach. Relationships between structure scores and explanatory variables were evaluated using regression analysis. Structure performance was strongly influenced by the individual project, suggesting that design quality, construction, and maintenance are as important as specific design features. Structure durability decreased if there was additional urban development following construction. Results also indicated that restoration activities have a "protective effect" on nearby structures. For rock BP, imbricated rock walls performed better than stone toe, due to increased structure height and boulder size. Rock FSVs that were keyed into the bank at angles between 35° and 90° were more durable, while RFs performed best when constructed using downstream grade control and increased substrate depth. The results of this study provide insight into design and project features that contribute to structure success. / Master of Science / Stream restoration aims to rehabilitate streams that have been impacted by humans, and log or rock structures in the channel are utilized to protect the bed and banks, redirect water away from the banks, and create habitat for aquatic organisms. However, there are few design standards for these structures. In this study, 536 instream structures in the state of Maryland were assessed to determine the effect of design and site characteristics on performance. Structures were scored for performance based on structural stability, sedimentation, erosion, and function. Design characteristics related to structure construction and placement, while site conditions related to the project and watershed characteristics. Statistical analyses were used to determine the relationship between structure performance and design and site characteristics. Structure performance was strongly influenced by the restoration project, indicating that design quality, construction, and maintenance are as important as specific design features. Structure durability decreased if there was additional urban development in the watershed following construction. Results also indicated that when structures were used in series, there was a "protective effect" on other nearby structures. Rock walls performed better as height increased, while rock weirs that were constructed into the streambank between 35° and 90° were more durable. These results provide insight into design and project features that contribute to structure success.