To date, mental fatigue has been shown to lead to a general decline in cognitive processing and motor performance. The goal of the current research was to establish the impact of mental fatigue on the contributions of explicit (i.e., conscious strategy) and implicit (unconscious) processes to visuomotor adaptation. Participants were divided into Mental Fatigue (MF) and Control groups. Mental fatigue was induced through a time load dual back task (TLDB), in which participants were required to respond as quickly and accurately as possible to letters based on recall of previously presented letters, as well as digits displayed on the screen in a choice reaction time task. The TLDB task lasted for 32 minutes, and the Control group watched a documentary for a similar length of time. Subjective feelings of mental fatigue, as indicated on a self-report scale, demonstrated that mental fatigue was significantly higher for the MF group after completion of the TLDB task. There was no similar increase in mental fatigue for the Control group. The increased mental fatigue was associated with decreased visuomotor adaptation to a 40° cursor rotation and retention of visuomotor adaptation. In particular, participants in the MF group adapted their reaches to a lesser extent early in training compared to the Control group and demonstrated less retention of visuomotor adaptation following a 20-minute rest. Furthermore, correlational analyses established that greater mental fatigue reported by participants in the MF group was associated with less explicit adaptation and greater implicit adaptation. Taken together, these results suggest that mental fatigue decreases the ability to engage in explicit processing, limiting the overall extent of visuomotor adaptation achieved.

Healthy individuals can adjust their movements when changes arise to the body or the environment. Advanced age is associated with central and peripheral changes that may negatively impact one’s ability to adapt motor performance, such us upper-limb (UL) reaching movements. In this thesis, we conducted four studies to address the impact of aging on coordination and adaptation of goal-directed reaches. In the first experiment, we examined compensatory arm–trunk coordination in older adults during trunk-assisted reaching, using two motor tasks : 1) the Stationary Hand Task (SHT) in which older and young participants were asked to maintain a fixed hand position while flexing forward at the trunk, and 2) the Reaching Hand Task (RHT) in which participants were instructed to reach to a within-arm’s reach target while simultaneously flexing forward at the trunk (Raptis et al., 2007; Sibindi et al., 2013). We found that in SHT, young and older participants were able to maintain a stable hand position and compensate for trunk movement by appropriate angular rotations at the elbow and shoulder joints. As well, in the RHT, both groups made similar small overshoot errors. However, older participants performance was significantly more variable compared to young adults. These results suggest that older adult preserve their ability to coordinate arm and trunk movements efficiently during reaching but are not as consistent as young adults. In the second experiment, we sought to determine the ability of older adults to adjust shoulder and elbow coordination in response to changing task demands. Thus, we asked young and older adults to perform the RHT of Raptis et al. (2007) from the first experiment. A detailed comparison of UL kinematics during reaches in the presence and absence of trunk motion (i.e., free- vs. blocked-trunk trials) was performed and compared between young and older adults. We found that participants in both age group were able to coordinate motion at the elbow and shoulder joints in accordance with motion at the trunk. However, the extent of changes at the UL joints was smaller and more variable in older adults compared to young ones, especially when trunk motion was involved. These results imply that older adults can coordinate their UL movements based on task requirements, but with less consistent performance compared to young adults. In the third experiment, we investigated the preservation of intermanual transfer and retention of implicit visuomotor adaptation in older adults. We had young and older participants train to reach with visual feedback rotated 30° counter-clockwise relative to their actual hand motion. Furthermore, we examined whether providing augmented somatosensory feedback regarding movement endpoint would enhance visuomotor adaptation. We found that older adults demonstrated a comparable magnitude of implicit adaptation, transfer, and retention of visuomotor adaptation as observed in young adults, regardless of the presence of augmented somatosensory feedback. These results indicate that intermanual transfer and retention do not differ significantly between young and older adults when adaptation is driven implicitly, regardless the availability of augmented somatosensory feedback. In the fourth experiment, we looked to determine age-related differences in the engagement of offline and online control processes during implicit visuomotor adaptation. A detailed analysis of reaching performance was conducted and between young and older adults, during and after visuomotor adaptation. We found that when rotation was introduced, participants in both age took longer time to complete their movements, reached with a lower peak velocity and spent more time homing in on the target compared to reaches with aligned cursor feedback. Additionally, older adults had more curved paths with rotated cursor feedback compared to their reaches with aligned cursor feedback. Moreover, these changes in reaching performance continued following adaptation for both groups. These results suggest that young and older adults engage more in online control processes during implicit visuomotor adaptation. Together, these studies show that older adults: 1) maintain the ability to use compensatory arm-trunk coordination to maintain reaching accuracy, 2) preserve the ability to adjust the coordination between UL joints to meet task demands, 3) maintain the ability to adjust reaches to meet changes in the reaching environment, as well as transfer and retain the newly acquired movement, and 4) preserve the ability to modify the control processes underlying these adapted movements to meet the demands of the reaching environment. In conclusion, the flexibility to coordinate and adapt upper limb reaching performance to meet changes in task demands is maintained across lifespan.