Since the development of knockout and transgenic mouse models, mice have become the most widely used mammalian animal model to study bone. Despite the advances in knowledge of bone biology and function that have occurred from use of mouse models, many studies use primarily qualitative techniques, which may result in overlooking important subtle pathophysiologic changes. The hypothesis of this dissertation is that quantitative techniques to measure bone structure and function could identify the physiologic role of carbonic anhydrase II and calbindin-D28k in mouse bone, despite earlier qualitative studies indicating mice without these proteins have normal bone structure and function. Furthermore, a method to quantify bone function in vivo will be tested in a mouse model.Although carbonic anhydrase II deficient mice are less severely affected than patients, the mice demonstrate features of osteopetrosis including metaphyseal widening and a 50% increase in trabecular bone volume. The mice partially compensate for inhibited osteoclast function by increasing osteoclast number.Calbindin-D28k knockout mice demonstrated an increase in bone volume that results from additional bone at the endosteal surfaces. The higher bone volume results in increased stiffness and failure loads, highlighting the potential use of drugs that inhibit calbindin-D28k to treat diseases such as osteoporosis.Finally, calcium phosphate ceramic and hydroxyapatite particles used as strain gauge coatings demonstrated bone bonding to mouse femora after two months in vivo. The use of hydroxyapatite particles to coat strain gauges is the first time this method has been used with all commercially available materials, and will allow other research groups to use this technique. The major limitation to in vivo bone strain measurement in mice is the relatively large size of the sensors, which resulted in increased second moments of inertia in the implanted bones.Overall, this dissertation demonstrates that the use of quantitative techniques, including histology, histomorphometry, µCT imaging, and mechanical testing can measure subtle changes in bone properties that have been previously overlooked. Development of additional quantitative methods to study bone biomechanics in mouse models may encourage other research groups to quantify bone properties if no changes are noted using primarily qualitative methods.