Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1957. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 281-284).

M. Comm. / The purpose of the study is to identify some guidelines to determine if any legal expenses — as defined in section 11(c) of the Income Tax Act, No 58 of 1962 ("the Act") actually incurred in respect of any claim, dispute or action at law arising in the course of or by any reason of the ordinary operations of a taxpayer in the carrying on of his trade —, are deductible. The admissibility of legal fees as a deduction depends primarily upon whether, in applying the provisions of section 11(a), the taxpayer is able to establish that such expenditure had been incurred in the production of income and was not of a capital nature. Furthermore, in terms of paragraph (c) of section 11, a taxpayer is entitled to deduct from his income any legal expenses, other than those of a capital nature, which he incurs and which arise in the course or by reason of the ordinary operations undertaken by him in the carrying on of his trade.The deduction is, however, limited to so much thereof as it: Is not of capital nature; Is not incurred in respect of any claim made against the taxpayer for the payment of damages or compensation if by reason of the nature of the claim or the circumstances, any payment which is or might be made in satisfaction or settlement of the claim does not or would not rank for deduction under section 11(a) or (b) of the Act; Is not incurred in respect of any claim made by the taxpayer for the payment to him of any amount which does not or would not constitute income of the taxpayer; and is not incurred in respect of any dispute or action at law relating to any such claim as in referred to in (ii) and (iii) above. The admissibility of legal expenses as a deduction depends primarily upon whether, in applying the provisions of section 11(a), the taxpayer is able to establish that such expenditure had been incurred in the production of income and was not of a capital nature. Furthermore, to establish, in terms of paragraph (c) of section 11, whether a taxpayer is entitled to deduct from income any legal expenses, other than those of a capital nature, which he incurs and which arise in the course or by reason of the ordinary operations undertaken by him in the carrying on of his trade.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 1976. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 143-145). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center.

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce specialising in Taxation / Taxpayers are broadly financed in two ways, namely through the use of debt and equity. The returns on capital and debt are treated differently from an income tax perspective (SARS 2013). The interest expense incurred by taxpayers in the production of income by a person carrying on a trade, are deductible in determining taxable income, subject to certain conditions and limitations. The number of provisions contained in the Income Tax Act of 1962 (the Act) which deal with the tax treatment of interest income and interest expenditure have gradually increased over time. There are numerous aspects to be borne in mind by resident and foreign companies when considering the income tax and withholding tax implications which may arise in respect of transactions giving rise to interest income and interest expenditure (SAICA 2015). This is affirmed by the number of provisions in the income tax act dealing with the deductibility of interest primarily dealt with in section 24J of the Act as well as indicated by the 2014 amendments to section 8F, the introduction of section 8FA, sections 23M and 23N into the legislation. The purpose of this report is to assess whether the Department of National Treasury (National Treasury) have taken the number of provisions of the deductibility of interest too far. / NG (2020)

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2008. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1953. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [144]-149).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2007. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

No description available.

Assignment (MRek)--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.

The Income Tax Bill (2012) proposes certain changes to the existing Income Tax Act that will impact on the method used to determine the taxable income of a taxpayer in Zimbabwe. Therefore, it is important to understand the tax consequences the Income Tax Bill creates for the taxpayer. The research aimed to elaborate on and explain the tax consequences that will arise as a result of applying the Income Tax Bill in Zimbabwe. The research was based on a qualitative method which involved the analysis and the interpretation of extracts from legislation and articles written on the proposed changes. The current “gross income” of a taxpayer consists of amounts earned from a source within or deemed to be from within Zimbabwe The proposed changes to the Act will change the tax system to a residence-based system, where resident taxpayers are taxed on amounts earned from all sources. Therefore, the driving factor which determines the taxability of an amount will become the taxpayer’s residency. Clause 2 of the proposed Act provides that income earned by a taxpayer should be separated into employment income, business income, property income and other specified income. This will make it unnecessary to determine the nature of an amount because capital amounts will be subject to income tax. The current Act provides for the deduction of expenditure incurred for the purpose of trade or in the production of income. Section 31(1)(a) of the proposed Act will restrict permissible deductions to expenditure incurred in the production of income. Consequently, expenditure not incurred for the purpose of earning income will no longer be deductible when the Income Tax Bill is implemented. The proposed Income Tax Act will increase the taxable income of a taxpayer as it makes amounts that are not currently subject to tax taxable, whilst restricting the deductions claimable.