Spelling suggestions: "subject:"infant industry protection"" "subject:"enfant industry protection""
1 |
The protection of infant industries in SACU : the Namibian poultry industries case / Stacey Mwewa SusaSusa, Stacey Mwewa January 2014 (has links)
The Southern Africa Customs Union was first established in 1889 between the Cape
of Good Hope and the Orange Free State. It has since undergone extensive change
resulting in the current 2002 Agreement which includes an institutional framework.
SACU’s member states comprise of Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa and
Swaziland. The Agreement thrives on the principle of free trade within the customs
union and common external tariffs on goods entering the customs area. However, as
an exception to free trade, article 25(1) of the 2002 Agreement recognises the right
of a member state to prohibit the importation or exportation of any goods from its
area. This may be done for economic, social, cultural or other reasons as may be
agreed upon by the Council. However, article 25(3) prohibits the use of article 25(1)
as a means to protect infant industries. As a further exception to free trade, article 26
of the 2002 Agreement recognises the right of all other member states, except South
Africa, to protect their infant industries. The protection offered in this article is limited,
because the definition of infant industry is not clear as to when the inception of such
an industry must be. This causes problems with the application of article 26,
especially where an industry was established, but only became operational after the
expiry of eight years, or has been established for over eight years on a small scale
and needs protection in order to enlarge and intensify its operations.
Due to this shortfall, Namibia used its Import and Export Control Act 30 of 1994 to
protect a key industry in Namibia, the poultry industry. However, according to article
25(3), this may be considered a violation, because Namibia has used its national
legislation to protect an infant industry. The key finding of this study is that the
protection of infant industries in SACU is not sufficient to cater for the economic
needs of the member states. To this end, SACU must consider allowing national
legislation to supplement and monitor infant industry protection in the member states’
areas. In addition, SACUs institutional framework, which is not fully operational at
present, must be established to function fully, as this may help address some of the
issues in SACU. / LLM (Import and Export Law), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
2 |
The protection of infant industries in SACU : the Namibian poultry industries case / Stacey Mwewa SusaSusa, Stacey Mwewa January 2014 (has links)
The Southern Africa Customs Union was first established in 1889 between the Cape
of Good Hope and the Orange Free State. It has since undergone extensive change
resulting in the current 2002 Agreement which includes an institutional framework.
SACU’s member states comprise of Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa and
Swaziland. The Agreement thrives on the principle of free trade within the customs
union and common external tariffs on goods entering the customs area. However, as
an exception to free trade, article 25(1) of the 2002 Agreement recognises the right
of a member state to prohibit the importation or exportation of any goods from its
area. This may be done for economic, social, cultural or other reasons as may be
agreed upon by the Council. However, article 25(3) prohibits the use of article 25(1)
as a means to protect infant industries. As a further exception to free trade, article 26
of the 2002 Agreement recognises the right of all other member states, except South
Africa, to protect their infant industries. The protection offered in this article is limited,
because the definition of infant industry is not clear as to when the inception of such
an industry must be. This causes problems with the application of article 26,
especially where an industry was established, but only became operational after the
expiry of eight years, or has been established for over eight years on a small scale
and needs protection in order to enlarge and intensify its operations.
Due to this shortfall, Namibia used its Import and Export Control Act 30 of 1994 to
protect a key industry in Namibia, the poultry industry. However, according to article
25(3), this may be considered a violation, because Namibia has used its national
legislation to protect an infant industry. The key finding of this study is that the
protection of infant industries in SACU is not sufficient to cater for the economic
needs of the member states. To this end, SACU must consider allowing national
legislation to supplement and monitor infant industry protection in the member states’
areas. In addition, SACUs institutional framework, which is not fully operational at
present, must be established to function fully, as this may help address some of the
issues in SACU. / LLM (Import and Export Law), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
Page generated in 0.1282 seconds