Thesis (M.S.)--University of Missouri--Rolla, 2007. / Vita. The entire thesis text is included in file. Title from title screen of thesis/dissertation PDF file (viewed April 22, 2008) Includes bibliographical references (p. 33-35).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of California, San Diego, 1997. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 239-255).

Thesis (M.S.)--Rutgers University, 2009. / "Graduate Program in Psychology." Includes bibliographical references (p. 26-27).

Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University, 1992. / Also available in electronic format on the Internet.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Carleton University, 1992. / Also available in electronic format on the Internet.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 1995. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 85-89).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1973. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 102-108).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1968. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

We address the challenging task of computational natural language inference, by which we mean bridging two or more natural language texts while also providing an explanation of how they are connected. In the context of question answering (i.e., finding short answers to natural language questions), this inference connects the question with its answer and we learn to approximate this inference with machine learning. In particular, here we present four approaches to question answering, each of which shows a significant improvement in performance over baseline methods. In our first approach, we make use of the underlying discourse structure inherent in free text (i.e. whether the text contains an explanation, elaboration, contrast, etc.) in order to increase the amount of training data for (and subsequently the performance of) a monolingual alignment model. In our second work, we propose a framework for training customized lexical semantics models such that each one represents a single semantic relation. We use causality as a use case, and demonstrate that our customized model is able to both identify causal relations as well as significantly improve our ability to answer causal questions. We then propose two approaches that seek to answer questions by learning to rank human-readable justifications for the answers, such that the model selects the answer with the best justification. The first uses a graph-structured representation of the background knowledge and performs information aggregation to construct multi-sentence justifications. The second reduces pre-processing costs by limiting itself to a single sentence and using a neural network to learn a latent representation of the background knowledge. For each of these, we show that in addition to significant improvement in correctly answering questions, we also outperform a strong baseline in terms of the quality of the answer justification given.

Most empirical work focuses on the estimation of average treatment effects (ATE). In this dissertation, I argue for a different way of thinking about causal inference by estimating individual causal effects (ICEs). I argue that focusing on estimating ICEs allows for a more precise and clear understanding of causal inference, reconciles the difference between what the researcher is interested in and what the researcher estimates, allows the researcher to explore and discover treatment effect heterogeneity, bridges the quantitative-qualitative divide, and allows for easy estimation of any other causal estimand. / Government