Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of North Texas, May, 2008. / Title from title page display. Includes bibliographical references.

Proefschrift Universiteit Maastricht. / Auteursnaam op omslag: Ron Schellings. Met lit. opg. - Met een samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Maastricht. / Met lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Purpose To assess patient satisfaction with the use of Portable Video Media (PVM) for the purpose of taking informed consent for common urological outpatient procedures performed under local anaesthesia. Methods Patients undergoing the following procedures were approached for recruitment: flexible cystoscopy with or without biopsy, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy or flexible cystoscopy with insertion or removal of a ureteric stent. Audio-visual media were developed for each procedure, with each script translated from English into isiXhosa and Afrikaans. The study involved a cross-over for each patient between Standard Verbal Consent (SVC) and PVM consent, with each patient randomised to start with SVC or PVM consent. Each of these consent-arms were assessed via a questionnaire. Results 60 patients completed participation, with PVM as the first exposure for 28 patients and 32 patients receiving SVC as their first arm of the study. When comparing the overall satisfaction between SVC and PVM consent (the total scores out of 18 for the questionnaire), patients scored significantly higher for PVM consent (M = 16.3 ± 2.4) compared to SVC (M = 15.4 ± 2.9) (p = 0.002). 92% of the total patient sample preferred PVM consent. Conclusion PVM proved superior to SVC in improving satisfaction in the consent process for common outpatient urological procedures performed under local anaesthesia.

Although many people choose to sign consent forms and participate in research, how many thoroughly read a consent form before signing it? Across 3 experiments using 348 undergraduate student participants, we examined whether personality characteristics as well as consent form content, format, and delivery method were related to thorough reading. Students repeatedly failed to read the consent forms, although small effects were found favoring electronic delivery methods and traditional format forms. Potential explanations are discussed and include participant apathy, participants trying to save time by not reading the consent form, and participant assumptions about consent forms.

No description available.

No description available.

Ziele: Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist eine standardisierte Analyse der Patientenzufriedenheit mit dem Aufklärungsgespräch und die mögliche Einflussfaktoren, die hier eine Rolle spielen können, zu bieten. Methodik: Es wurden 189 Fragebögen bzw. Aufklärungsgespräche in den Kliniken für Anästhesie und Innere Medizin im St. Josef Krankenhaus und Chirurgie und Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie im Leopoldina Krankenhaus in Schweinfurt untersucht. Ergebnisse: Der Fragebogen, der verwendet wurde, war reliabel. Es zeigte sich eine schlechte Item-Selektivität. Die Kriteriumsvalidität konnte bestätigt werden jedoch nicht die diskriminante Validität. Die Patienten waren zufriedener mit Ärzten, die Deutsch als Muttersprache angaben, mit längeren Aufklärungsgesprächen und mit Fachärzten im Vergleich zu Assistenzärzten. Eine höhere allgemeine Lebenszufriedenheit war mit höherer Patientenzufriedenheit mit dem Aufklärungsgespräch assoziiert. Der moralistische Bias kann einen Störfaktor der Validität der Messungen darstellen. Zusammenfassung: Eine angemessene Gesprächdauer, die deutsche Muttersprache und der Facharztstatus des aufklärenden Arztes haben einen positiven Einfluss auf die Patientenzufriedenheit mit dem Aufklärungsgespräch. Um sicher zu stellen, welche von diesen drei Faktoren besondere Wichtigkeit besitzt, werden weitere Untersuchungen benötigt. / Objective: The aim of the present study is to provide a standardized analysis of patient satisfaction with informed consent process and the possible influencing factors that can play a role here. Methoden: 189 questionnaires/informed consent were examined in the clinics for anesthesia and internal medicine in St. Josef Hospital and surgery and child and adolescent psychiatry in Leopoldina Hospital in Schweinfurt. Results: The questionnaire used was reliable. There was poor item selectivity. The criterion validity was confirmed but not the discriminant validity. Patients were more satisfied with doctors who spoke German as their native language, with longer duration oft the informed consent process and with specialists compared to assistant doctors. Higher general life satisfaction was associated with higher patient satisfaction. The moralistic bias can represent a confounding factor in the validity of the measurements. Conclusion: An appropriate duration of the conversation, the German native language and the doctor's specialist status have a positive influence on patient satisfaction with informed consent process. Further research is needed to determine which of these three factors is particularly important.

No description available.

No description available.