Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-07-04T12:24:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 SuzanaCeciliaCortesDeAraujoESilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1415802 bytes, checksum: 8bb6cdf5f977070bc021d4b3ddb3a793 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-07-12T12:18:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 SuzanaCeciliaCortesDeAraujoESilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1415802 bytes, checksum: 8bb6cdf5f977070bc021d4b3ddb3a793 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-12T12:18:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SuzanaCeciliaCortesDeAraujoESilva_DISSERT.pdf: 1415802 bytes, checksum: 8bb6cdf5f977070bc021d4b3ddb3a793 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-05 / A formula??o e implementa??o de pol?ticas p?blicas para o enfrentamento de quest?es relacionadas ao consumo de subst?ncias psicoativas fundamentam, estruturam e moldam a rela??o do Estado com os consumidores de subst?ncias psicoativas. Dentre as pr?ticas estatais a eles direcionadas, no contexto do modelo proibicionista atualmente eleito como par?metro para o desenvolvimento pol?ticas nesta seara, a interna??o destes indiv?duos contra a sua vontade para tratamento for?ado tem sido utilizada tanto em condutas adotadas pelo Poder Executivo, quanto como op??o recorrente na atua??o do Judici?rio. Neste cen?rio, o presente trabalho objetiva analisar a compatibilidade constitucional da interna??o de consumidores de subst?ncias psicoativas para tratamento for?ado. A an?lise a ser empreendida parte da contextualiza??o pol?tica, legislativa e judicial da atua??o estatal na interna??o contra a vontade de consumidores de psicoativos. Procurar-se-?, ent?o, adotando-se uma perspectiva jur?dico-dogm?tica, fixar o par?metro jusfundamental para o controle de constitucionalidade a ser empreendido, esclarecendo o alcance de sua ?rea de prote??o e seus correspondentes limites constitucionais. Em seguida, ? luz do direito fundamental ? autodetermina??o, fixado como par?metro e como consect?rio do direito fundamental ? liberdade previsto no art. 5?, caput, da Constitui??o Federal, os prop?sitos apresentados como justifica??o ? interven??o estatal ora analisada, bem como os meios utilizados pelo Poder P?blico para a implementa??o da interven??o, ter?o sua licitude verificada. Por fim, a interna??o contra a vontade de consumidores de subst?ncias psicoativas ser? submetida aos crit?rios empiricamente orientados da adequa??o e da necessidade, decorrentes do princ?pio da proporcionalidade, para que, assim, seja poss?vel aferir ou n?o a constitucionalidade da atua??o estatal investigada. / The formulation and implementation of public politics addressed to issues related to the consumption of psychoactive substances base, structure and shape the State's relationship with the user. Among the state practices directed to drug users, considering the context of the prohibitionist model currently elected as a parameter for the development politics in this endeavor, the hospitalization of these individuals against their volition for forced treatment has been instrument and reality both approaches adopted by the Executive, and as a recurring option in the Brazilian judicial performance. In this scenario, the present study aims to analyze the constitutional compatibility of hospitalization consumers of psychoactive substances for forced treatment. The analysis to be undertaken starts with the political, legislative and judicial context of state action in hospitalization against the volition of consumers of psychoactive drugs. The research will then, adopting un dogmatic perspective, set the parameter jusfundamental for the constitutional review to be undertaken, clarifying his protection area and corresponding constitutional limits. Afterward, according to the fundamental right of self-determination, set as a parameter and as logical outcome of the fundamental right to freedom foreseen in the art. 5, caput, of the Federal Constitution, the purposes presented as justification for the state intervention now analyzed, and the means used by the Government for the implementation of the intervention, will have its lawfulness verified. And finally, the hospitalization against the volition of psychoactive substances consumers will be subjected to empirical criteria of appropriateness and necessity, stemmed from the principle of proportionality, to thus be possible to conclude about the constitutionality of the state action now investigated.